http://dbd.game/killswitch
Why did you """""""""""FIX""""""""" the twins bug when EVERYONE wanted it to stay?
There's still game breaking bugs with the twins from what i've seen yet those remain but 1 that benifits the twins and makes them feel better to play fixed ASAP.
Why Behavior? why are you so out of touch with what the community has to say?
Comments
-
They fixed this but completely left Twins broken and unplayable. They are literally going to make the whole 2 Twins mains that exist quit the game at this rate.
12 -
It's probably best that they don't leave bugs in the game but hopefully implement it officially in future after seeing all the feedback
3 -
they also added a new bug.. you cant see victors aura when he's attached to someone
7 -
The truth is they regret making twins and are trying to make them irrelevant that Noone plays them.
10 -
Because they straight up just don't like them.
8 -
Probably because if nobody plays Twins then they don't have to fix them.
9 -
I have to wonder why they don’t just killswitch ‘em at this point.
2 -
You can't really leave bugs in the game, even if you wanted to implement that feature it should be an intentional change.
Knowing this game, that same bug probably caused a survivor to gain bloodlust 1 permanently if the basement chest was opened while they were on hook or something.
3 -
No that's intentional. If the surv is trying to crush victor you can see his aura.
0 -
4 -
a bug is a bug and should be removed, simple as that
1 -
I couldn't care less about them removing a bug that technically made the Twins stronger. It's a bug, and unintentional.
However, this killer has had detrimental and game-breaking bugs for many months now, and we have heard next to no word of a possible fix on the horizon. Meanwhile, this switching bug didn't even make it to live from the PTB.
I understand that this might have been a lot more easy bug to fix, while the older ones are still needing more time. But the message that is currently being sent to players is not a very pleasant one.
2 -
ok so what about the game breaking ones instead of 1 making them slightly better?
1 -
That would put pressure on them yo fix the cause. Best to take the out of sight out of mind approach.
0 -
to everyone saying "a bug is a bug and should be removed"i agree-but why would they prioritize a bug thats just a qol change instead of one of the many, many, many bugs that make them unplayable?
2 -
fact
0
