The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

Killer forfeit option

Ellis1
Ellis1 Member Posts: 3
edited May 2023 in Feedback and Suggestions

Something the killer can initiate, if at least three survivors agree, the match will end with escapes and bonuses awarded to the survivors, while no progression will be awarded to the killer.

It can't be just me, sometimes a game is just a loss and continuing is a chore. It would be so nice if there was an option to forfeit, an option that would benefit the survivors just as much as had they escaped, but also allow me to continue to another game where I get to start again, without having to wait a cool down, considering a majority of survivors agreed.

Post edited by Ellis1 on

Comments

  • YOURFRIEND
    YOURFRIEND Member Posts: 3,389

    I just want to be able to leave during the egc. Ushering survivors out is so tedious every single game I lose.

  • Ellis1
    Ellis1 Member Posts: 3
    edited May 2023

    Disconnecting results in a penalty, assuming the majority of survivors agree, a forfeit option would not result in a penalty.

    The only other option that does not result in a penalty is simply idling, and that is not fun for either side.

    Post edited by JocelynAwakens on
  • TheTom20
    TheTom20 Member Posts: 484

    Friend of mine doesn't play killer often felt so stressed in a game he went afk but the survivors would not leave or finish the gens they spend nearly 30 minutes clicking an tea bagging him from behind. They could leave the gates at any moment but continued to taunt him.

  • Kirarozu
    Kirarozu Member Posts: 240
    edited May 2023

    As long as survivors get the same. I want to be able to forfeit too when I know my team is terrible. Instead I get slugged while they chase my bad teammates one of which suddenly becomes the best looper in the game when everyone else is slugged or dead. Couldn’t go more than 2 seconds when we were all alive but by god theyre gonna loop their ass off dragging the game out for everyone waiting on them to die.

  • NoHookDC
    NoHookDC Member Posts: 234

    Rofl. No Survivor would agree to let their punching bag...I mean, the Killer, go.

    They would deny it just so they can feel big and mean and have yet more power with which to rip the wings off the fly...I mean, the Killer.

  • DavidHypnos
    DavidHypnos Member Posts: 730

    the endgame collapse already takes care of idling survivors. As for survivors that aren’t doing anything but being toxic I think it’s fair to just d/c and take the penalty. Chances are if they’re only playing to torment you then they aren’t going to agree to end the game. Also, like was mentioned above me if they do this for killer they need to do it for survivors too. I saw a video today where an Oni literally body blocked a Quentin in a corner rather than hook him or go after the other survivors and when everyone else left just left him until the EGC ran out.

  • Technature
    Technature Member Posts: 619

    I can guarantee you that Oni got a ban. There's four different people that could have taken video evidence of them holding the game hostage from that and sent it in.

  • Spectralfx
    Spectralfx Member Posts: 605
    edited May 2023

    Honestly,

    I will always elect to DC from a match were survivors don't do gens because it is always a win timewise, the penalty rarely go up to a point where you lose to it since its not that common (the real issue being gen rushes imo)

    But don't EVER make it a "vote" that gives agency to the other party, its a self-defeating thing.

    Just do away with DC penalties on all accounts, it's silly.