Why I refuse to play as or against Sadako on principle

Full disclosure: I've really tried to keep an open mind about her before reaching my conclusions. I've been following the community discourse surrounding her and I've tried to implement the counterplays that many people have kindly suggested. I've also given it time and played many matches against her and as her (using multiple add-ons). But I have come to the conclusion that her design is problematic and flawed and I genuinely believe she is an issue that extends beyond survivors simply adjusting to the new Onryo. The only time that I have ever felt this strongly about something in the game was the 25s incapacitated Eruption.

Before I explain why I think Sadako is problematic, let me try to illustrate what I understand to be the optimal play style for Sadako, which is very different from what the devs probably intended. My impression is that she was intended to be a stealth killer where the condemn mechanic is a passive slowdown similar to Pig's and the TVs offer map mobility and some help in chase. However, if she is played as intended, you’ll find her to be incredibly weak. The optimal Sadako prioritizes smacking tapes off of survivors’ hands to build condemn (ideally by ambushing them while they are in a bad spot) and keeping TVs off by spamming teleport to deny survivors the chance to grab a tape. If a survivor is downed and she suspects that they have a threatening level of condemn, hooking would be a waste of time. She should continue teleporting to active TVs to deny them a chance to relieve the condemn pressure. Once they recover, teleport back to build condemn. If they take a tape, they’ll be vulnerable again and probably require 1 more down to be mori-able. The game has turned into a 3v1 at 4-5 gens and the game plays itself from that point onward.

I will now try to explain the best I can as to why I feel so strongly about Sadako.

1. Managing Condemnation feels like a primary objective instead of a secondary objective. In most of my Onryo games, doing gens becomes an afterthought. I'm sure a lot of you experience this too. Survivors do gens for a bit, get their tape knocked off of their hands because they get ambushed while being in a bad spot, and now they have to go on a journey around the map to find an active TV otherwise they'll get behind on condemnation. Even if they get to an active TV, she might just teleport there and now your time is wasted.
2. Versing an Onryo feels like a stampede. Against an Onryo that is playing optimally, active TVs are a rare commodity. The really dumb part is that if you take a tape from the active TV, it switches off and now you might have screwed over a teammate who is more vulnerable than you and needs the tape more than you do. Even worse, when you try to get rid of your stacks and in that desperate situation, the only TV you can find is an active one, you put the tape in and the TV turns off and you might have screwed your teammate over again. Survivors scramble like headless chickens trying to find an active TV and in the process of managing their own condemn, they very likely will screw over a teammate. It really doesn't make sense that the design is such that you will have to compete with your teammates for active TVs in order to survive.
3. There is such a small margin of error against Sadakos. Especially with some add-ons, reaching 3-4 stacks feels like you have gone past the point of no return, even more so if you are injured or slugged. If you don't have a tape, she can teleport to TVs around you to build condemn and make sure you don't grab a tape. If you somehow manage to get a tape, she will knock it right out of your hand and you may very well be close to death. Furthermore, you only need one person to mess up against Sadako for the entire team to crumble.
4. But "just take a tape at the start of the match", you say. To oversimplify and reduce the counterplay to Sadako to this simple act is akin to teaching chess to a novice by telling them to start off with e4 every chess match and leave them to their own devices afterward. It ignores the complexity of the midgame, where people have been ambushed, active TVs become a rare commodity, and resources are depleted. What happens if you get ambushed and you now have 2-3 stacks? Do you take another tape (which a teammate might need more) and risk being effectively dead if she catches you? If she doesn't catch you, do you put in the tape but in the process switch off the TV and screw your teammate even more? The macro game against Sadako is so complex as there are so many considerations to make. It's really not simple as just taking a tape early in the game.
5. Altruism is discouraged and even counterproductive against her. Do you want to take hits for a vulnerable teammate? If you have a tape, here are 2 free stacks for you. So now you have to be vulnerable to condemnation and have to go on a journey to find another active TV. And if Sadako REALLY wants to go after someone, she can just demanifest and bypass all bodyblocks. So now you've wasted your time by not being on gens. It's just a lose-lose situation where you helplessly watch your teammate get mowed down.
6. Sadako's slowdown is orders of magnitude more potent than Pig's and Pinhead's. Sadako's basekit slowdown is like Pig's if all survivors start off the match with an active Reverse Bear Trap but the auras of the boxes are not shown. Sadako's basekit slowdown is like Pinhead's if each survivor had to do their own Iridescent Lament Configuration and if any individual Survivor fails to do it in time, they die. Obviously, this is just an analogy but you get the point. This is her basekit btw, I haven't even included her addons.
7. She has problematic addons. The biggest culprits are the Iridescent Videotape and Mother's Comb for obvious reasons. Both of them allow for Sadako to so easily harass any survivor to death. Ring Drawing remains overturned because it so heavily punishes altruism and it is imperative that survivors remain healed against a stealth killer like her. A full stack is too much in my opinion, because of all the reasons above.
8. She, more so than any other Killer, punishes people for being dumb enough to play anything other than a 4 man swf against her. Information and coordination are especially vital in order to perform well against Sadakos. You need to know where she is, you need to be able to communicate where TVs are, you need to coordinate a location to reset, you need to coordinate to help vulnerable teammates, etc. Good luck trying to beat her in solo q.
9. I know I’m going to get crucified for this, but I think playing Sadako yields disproportionately high results relative to the skill it takes to play her. I'm not trying to diminish the skill it takes to play Sadako, but it's really hard to argue that it is much more than M1 chase, good game sense (awareness of where survivors are, which can be made up for with perks and addons), and an understanding of her mechanics. I don't know about you, but it won't sit right with me if a Billy player who puts in hundreds of hours trying to master a mechanically difficult killer produces a fraction of the results than that of a killer with wholly transferable skills.
10. Playing against Sadako is orders of magnitude harder than playing Sadako. This is due to the aforementioned reaons. That's why I personally don't find it rewarding when I do well with her and why I don't really get impressed when a Sadako slaughters my team at 5 gens.
11. You can't use your items when you have a tape in your hand. This literally doesn't make any sense whatsoever. Self-healing is probably the strongest counter against Sadako, and that is artificially negated. It probably is an oversight, but this desperately needs to go.
12. "She is just an M1 killer and if you struggle against her, it is a skill issue". So I guess I'm the only one in solo-q who gets ambushed and gets caught in a bad spot against stealth killers who hit-and-run. Please teach me your ways.

That's all I have to say about Sadako. Writing this has been incredibly therapeutic for me and I hope to have a vibrant discussion about the points I raised in this post. Thank you for your time.