Whered that post blatantly showing DC from a fog whisperer go?
Comments
-
You shall not speak bad about fog whisperers. But when mortals dc they get banned.
5 -
Ahh so the covering the fog whisperers mistakes goes into the forums too? Ouch...
2 -
You mean the name-and-shame thread? It was deleted, as per the rules.
1 -
So had it been posted with no names? It would have stayed? You and I both know that's a lie.
It's not name and shaming if they do it regularly LIVE on stream. Its not like people dont see it. It's not a personal attack or a witch hunt. Everyone already knows she does it.
It's just a shame these people get away with it even with this "dc system" in place.
0 -
If it had been posted with no names and without "subtle" hints as to who it was, it might have stayed, yes.
It's name and shame regardless. No amount of rationalizing is going to change that.
0 -
Why did my post blatantly breaking rules get removed guys? I just don't GET IT.
3 -
So we completely disregard the underlying issue, because of technical bs? Her actions are unacceptable and we both know it. Stop acting like you believe otherwise simply because it was showed as a potential "name and shame".
Its not name and shame if the actions are 100% true and against the rules of the game. It's called, "evidence".
Shes (and many others) getting away with breaking rules, and now being covered up.... just saying.
0 -
It wasnt my post, first off, so lose that attitude hon.
I had a question as to why the blatant proof got removed, and will as we all know, never be dealt with.
0 -
No, we delete threads that do nothing because they break the rules. Don't pretend you're the victim of some widespread conspiracy when the thread was deleted because it blatantly violated the rules of this forum.
0 -
Hon, it wasnt MY thread. I saw it, and went to see what was going on in it to find it gone.
Just proving my point. Thanks. Cover this ######### up more please.
If we cant call then out for doing it, nothing will ever get done.
0 -
I'm sure I've seen other posts edited, not deleted entirely.
That said it's a very bad look having behaviour staff constantly talking about disconnecting being against the rules while someone officially endorsed by them does so anyway. I hope they're discussing it with the person in question and not sweeping it under the rug, You can't expect the community to take disconnecting seriously if officially endorsed people don't.
3 -
Exactly. If it was a "this guys an #########" post absolutely. Its 100% unnecessary and a witch hunt. But this is just pure evidence of someone getting away with it, and thread deleted. Not asked to hide info or change things. Just poof, gone, nobody can see what happened now.
1 -
I didn't say it was your thread. I just told you to stop playing the victim card by claiming this is being hidden or whatever bullshit you want to pretend is happening.
0 -
Depends on the post itself and how much of a pain in the ass it'd be to remove all naming and shaming from it. It's not the mods' job to clean up after people who break the rules by removing the bits of their comments that are rule-breaking.
I, too, hope they're taking action against DCers of all types, and not just the ones certain elements of the vocal community seem to fixate on.
0 -
Here is a line of text, no names, no harsh language, we are all nice down here.
Nobody cares if a Fog Whisperer has an attitude lmao, there is like 100 of them now. What is kinda relevant is the "haha fuk u i break rules, me no punishment" kind of mentality, the entitled (elite) mentality.
4 -
Agreed. Anyone with that attitude needs to be beaten off their high horse by way of banhammer.
1 -
And what rule is she breaking by disconnecting under the threshold?
0 -
Considering DCing is listed in game as a bannable offense. They're breaking the intentionally dc/rage quitting rule. Like...???
0 -
You told me to stop acting like the victim of a conspiracy to hide threads. As if it were my thread. Dont backtrack what you meant now.
Names could have been edited relatively easily. What is happening is nothing against these dcs. Which us my point. We literally see someone breaking the rules, and the post just poofs away with no warning or mention. Most posts I've seen give a warning, "hey hide names, it's not allowed".
So it seemed extremely odd to me that when a fogwhisperer is the one in question, the post up and vanishes.
0 -
Where? Where does it say that?
0 -
Post game. Click report. One of the options straight up says ragequitting/dc.
Like, are you kidding right now?
Or are you just defending DCs when it's a specific person.
DCs are unacceptable for any reason unless the game is being held hostage imo. If you CAN continue to play, dont quit because it's not HOW you wanted it to go.
Especially if its JUST to de rank.
But you already knew all that.
0 -
I posted that after you said it wasn't your thread. I'm not backtracking anything, you're just refusing to accept the truth.
Again, it's not on the mods to clean up after users. On most forums I go to, comments that break the rules are deleted and the users are contacted personally, so as not to disrupt the forum itself.
0 -
If they didn't ban ochido they'll most likely would have made him a fog whisperer despite the fact that he's been advertising exploit and is basicly the physical manifestation of everything that is wrong with the game
They don't care what fog whisperer do as long as they give visibility to the game
3 -
Oh, you're right, literal seconds after I responded to someone else. I'm SURE you wouldnt have said it without seeing his post and then flashing your response to me. Especially since you quoted my response to you, and not the person where I said it wasnt my post....
I accept the truth. Fog whisperers and many players do whatever they want and the devs wont punish it.
Just didnt realize people calling it out on a forum where you know, issues like this can be discussed, would be such an issue and swept away under the guise of "name and shame" as if we didnt already know it and it was just proof of it happening.
0 -
Which was a point I raised in the thread in question. So when I went to see responses and found it mia, I was surprised.
I was surprised they banned him at all, considering the attention they get, they should have just sponsored him as well. Since it seems the attention they get comes from a lot of players that play scummy/toxic.
0 -
One of the reasons a post can get removed is because it is breaking forum rules.
2
