Will we ever see a bleed out option?

BDSEM
BDSEM Unconfirmed, Member Posts: 1

Been getting a lot of sluggers recently and no one likes to go out that way. If we could at least get the last survivor out it would make me and other survivor mains feel a little better. Could this be a future game mechanic or is it completely out of the cards?

Answers

  • bleep275
    bleep275 Member Posts: 252

    yeah it’s been so severe that I started running unbreakable and exponential. I also feel like I’m forced to run anti-camp/tunnel perks too. I only play survivor now if a bunch of friends want to play and goof off.

  • Neaxolotl
    Neaxolotl Member Posts: 1,477

    Never, simply because giving yet another free DC only makes game unhealthy

    There is absolutely no reason game has to be bend to your will just to get the last survivor out

  • vol4r
    vol4r Member Posts: 259

    Nooope, there should be some mechanism to fight miserable gameplay.

    Slugging and tunneling is unhealthy to the game, it destroys fun for majority of players in the trial.

  • Bran
    Bran Member Posts: 2,096

    In the current iteration of the game no. Not much to say since it would just give survivors a free dc.

  • ratcoffee
    ratcoffee Member Posts: 1,443
    edited July 16

    Been seeing a lot of weird stuff on the forums today. Now I'm seeing people whove previously complained that survivors force killers to stay in the match 2 extra minutes by teabagging at the exit gate, and who therefore should understand the misery of having absolutely no recourse to shorten an already lost match; arguing against implementing mechanics that would provide recourse to shorten an already lost match. Bewildered as to what could cause this change of heart.

    In any case, I think any recourse to shorten a truly lost game - not just "oh no one gen popped" or "oh no I got found first" but one where the outcome for everyone is actually set in stone - is good

    Post edited by ratcoffee on