Can I rant about killer at high MMR?

I thought the issue was gen rushing? I mean the blood web has been dismal with tool boxes. Anybody else notice they didn't have an event one? Good thing I loaded up on the other events

yea, its an problem and i have this too. I think they should remove the map offerings and maybe bring back the old offerings with 200% to not get 100% the map. And the syringes is a prob. too but the map offerings are more problematic.

if only we could see our own mmr

Again if you're in "High MMR", then you're winning a lot of games with 3/4ks. Go for 2 kills at maximum, spread hooks against chiller survivors if you care about fun. Or play strong killers with busted loadouts…

Or better yet:

If only MMR didn't exist.

Because there's probably no point. We wouldn't need to show what MMR number we are (if we had one), if people could just accept that certain things, only high level players do. But even in the face of crazy fast-paced killer games with on-the-go match commentary, there's always naysayers being like, "They brought map offerings and instaheals? Mid survivors." and "Their 1 chase lasted 2 minutes? Nah, those are still bad survivors. Must be your skill."

There's like no skill in this game at this point. It's just matchup advantage. You get a team who has no clue what they're doing, and crumbles off of 1 survivor getting hooked once, or you go against a sweat squad who "just don't take a bad chase" doesn't apply to because they never let themselves be out-positioned, and when they do, they exhaustion perk or Styptic Agent away. Or the map RNG. Sometimes Ormond feels barren, and other times it's just pallet into pallet into pallet. Same with farm maps.

Trust me, that undeniable proof you're looking for, it would still have mass deniers if it was presented. That's just what this community does.

ohh we won't deny theres deniers, but how do we know whos in the "high mmr" and whom isn't. The op can prove they go against team eternal (we're assuming this is some high group since its a comp group correct?) with a simple screen shot or video of them facing said team which then in turns they are in "high mmr".

We also ask why should the "average" accept what the "high" say? Thats more for us than the topic but really now, why would we want more sheeple?

What we can take from this is that people are using "strong" builds and could possibly be a swf due to coordination. Maybe they we're just good, yet not high mmr? We could also be "that guy" and say maybe you didnt play well but we'll take your word cause we cant prove otherwise. Maybe they we're. No one can tell either way so we're all still at square uno.

Last time I checked they were definitely bugged FYI. Literally every map that was offered we went to irrespective of which side offered it. I understand there's a chance you'll still get the offered map with a Sac Ward, but this was like 5 or 6 in a row. I can't believe that is a coincidence.

MMR doesn't favor anybody. It's just there, and it sucks when you're good and are not at high MMR, because you'll either stomp as killer or get stomped as solo, for no skill-related reasons. Just mismatches.

Killer "wins" a majority of the time because survivors straight-up don't do their objective at low level, which is where a majority of survivors are at. And at mid level, people give the killer 1-2 free kills from over altruism at the very end. To your credit, not all 4-man SWFs play well. But some play well, unstoppably so, until the very end and throw the game, the same as solos would. It doesn't mean that their insane advantage compared to killers and solos doesn't exist.

And just looking at the possibilities of how you'd get to a killer majority win rate, that could be 51% although it usually rests around 60% in this game. That means killers could possibly draw a majority of their games, a have a few actual wins thrown in just to get them over that 50% win rate. That's not good. Imagine playing a 1v4 game, and playing as the 1, you draw 80% of your matches.

Killers don't have anything near second chance perks, except Coup De Grace and endgame perks, but those are easily fallible. I've had Bloodlust 3 + Coup + a stack of PWYF or something at a loop, and I didn't catch the survivor when they made a mistake and I swang. So even though Otz will say that Coup is unfair, I think that scenario proves that it's not a true second chance perk would be. Compared to OTR or DH, which just give you another health state/print burst off of being hit, killers don't have a perk which turns a miss into a down. That applies to NOED, which btw is destroyable and completely reveals itself to the whole team, only downside being when the killer literally has someone hooked on it. But that perk and the endgame perks that buy the killer more time after all gens get done, most of the time that just delays the inevitable. You get maybe 2 more downs/hooks on people who aren't dead on hook, because the game hides that info from you baseline, and 3-4 people still escape after recuperating. Those perks virtually never turn a 1-0k into a 4k, like so many suggest that they do. Killer doesn't get any real second chances.

To be honest, we were hoping for a Photoshop with a big label of "high MMR" once they remembered this

what makes you think your a high level player?

Challenge is not the issue in this situation. It is just overall really boring to end up on the same 4 maps over and over again. These kinds of survivors will fall like flies or even dc when they don't get their map. They are on auto pilot like with WoO.
Map offerings in general wouldn't be a problem if maps were balanced but unfortunately they aren't. So unless you wan't to play Midwich Nurse/Dredge and call it a fair game the core issue here is that always heavily survivor sided maps are picked.
It get's boring then annyoing and finally frustrating.
Playing against good surviors is not the issue, maps are.

Also winning is not always your main goal. You don't need to win at 5 gens or 0 hooks to have fun in a match. So having a full out comp battle every match is tiring. Which makes this even more annyoing is that a lot of surivors don't respect killers anymore and try to annoy the killer player with toxic or (what I like to call it) gremlin moves.

An interesting facet about Dead By Daylight is that, when you start out as killer, you go up against survivors who makes the worst plays humanly possible, fail skill checks, hide in lockers and don't do gens, etc. So you mop the floor with those guys and keep going up in the MMR. But while you're doing that, survivors are ALSO evolving, getting smarter, running better perks, learning to loop, etc. Until finally the corner hiding Claudette turns into the p100 Nea running Adrenaline, DS, Dead hard and unbreakable who can flashlight you every five seconds of a match. And her friends who are all running strong builds, with flashlights.

It's not much fun on either side of that equation, to be fair. As survivor, you start out with teammates who let you die on hook, dc and go next, don't do gens etc. You end up dying a lot. Unless you're part of a swf that helps you, you've gotta play like you're in the DBD Olympics to rise up in the MMR and get decent teammates. And I think some survivors, when they get up to that point, are pretty bitter about killers. They want to mop the floor with killers the way they got mopped up. Hence some of the attitude that comes out in games. I suppose all of it can create misunderstandings and conflicts on both sides.

Oh but when a survivor complains though its get good skill issue, killer ain't at fault, its you or your teammate fault,learn to loop, stealth, run this run that. Change your playstyle and I can go on. Well killers out to do the same thing they suggest to survivors aka take a page out their own book.