Why Wraith is so insanely overpowered?

• For Your Complaints

1. So that he can have some map pressure.
2. So that he can have a anti-loop tool.
3. Because BHVR wanted to remove item interactions with killer power. I believe Nemesis zombies are the only one still in the game.
4. Add-ons are gold standard. They increase his power for the most part while having very few trash choices.
5. So he can stop survivors who path badly or are out of position; giving him some more anti-loop.

• For Your Suggestions

1. No. He would lose all map pressure.
2. No. He would lose all anti-loop.
3. No. BHVR don't want item interactions w/killer powers.
4. No. His add-ons are the gold standard others killers should follow.
5. No. He shouldn't be punished for using his power correctly.

Also, Wraith is a very middle of the pack killer. There is nothing OP about him at all but you are entitled to your opinion.

This post is obviously one of two things. A troll post or a noob post. Wraith is notoriously not overpowered. Only someone inexperienced in the game would think so. If you think Wraith is overpowered then my recommendation is to play 100 games as Wraith. At first you'll probably go up against newbs and stomp them easily confirming your bias that Wraith is overpowered. But as you improve your MMR and start going up against experienced survivors, you'll start to see his short comings and how to exploit him.

I don't want to repeat myself but I will. Play 100 consecutive games as Wraith and record the results. The number of games you played as Wraith and against Wraith clearly isn't enough. You are simply wrong about your assumption. The 5 to 20 games you've played as Wraith are not enough. If you are playing against noobs then you can play as Trapper and never set a trap and still stomp. It's only when you build up enough MMR to go against experienced survivors that you'll start to see a killer's weaknesses. There is a reason that Wraith isn't considered a high tier killer.

If you are sprinting as he is uncloaking, your pathing would have to be terrible to get hit, even at close distances. His slow down during the uncloak would put you well out of range of his lunge if you are actually sprinting (SB/Lithe/BL/etc)

Then again you think he's overtuned, so I guess I'd second the above recommendation to play him, climb up to high MMR with him, and take notes on how he gets destroyed so you can use that info as survivor.

Also the implication that only killer mains think he's weak (wonder why they wouldn't know how strong he apparently is?) is pretty broad too, most of the community on both sides generally agree that he is one of the weaker killers (though few would call him the worst.)

The point of playing high MMR is so that you can see how people counter you, as I mentioned. Wraith has multiple counters, some of which are even mentioned in this thread.

as for your claims about "full SWF teams that play killer(?)" you're looking for an excuse to dismiss info you don't agree with. Adding a random woe is solo Q comment at the end is not an argument, just a tangent complaint.

Again, you're being hyperbolic. You do not need to be next to a window or pallet to not get hit by wraith, especially if you hear his footsteps and snarl/see his shimmer/have any awareness as he approaches. And exhaustion perks do counter his uncloak lunge, when used correctly. He often needs to cancel his decloak and chase until the sprint ends, catch up and look for a pallet/window to bodyblock, then uncloak and go for the lunge. Again, this is all counterable by proper pathing, not just using map resources.

Learn from it or don't, but there's a reason this wraith op sentiment usually gets laughed at.

(also, TR while cloaked? Lunge distance reduced? Those are horrible suggestions.)

This is the second post I saw recently saying Wraith is op. Wraith's greatest power is hurting my eyes while I don't blink so I can see him coming.

I don't think he's op at all. That addon that lets him see gen progress by their auras is pretty strong, but he's not Nurse, so I'm alright going against a Wraith :)

Calling something "the best M1 killer" is like determining "this is the strongest ant I've found." There's just nothing there. And you using emotional buzzwords like "annoying," and saying that ALL people who play Wraith are the biggest campers/tunnelers, isn't helping your case.

That is such a lie. Play him and see how smooth his uncloak/lunge is. Except it isn't, because it's slow and janky, ever since his nerf way back when. I can't remember the last time I got a hit with Wraith that I didn't have to fight for. He's like Freddy or Pig. He's got to fight for every little hit, even at the weakest of tiles. If your survivors have no clue what they're doing, then maybe your experience is different. But either way, we seem to be appraising two totally different killers.

If we're in the habit of complaining about grammar, I hope you have no complains to me checking yours? Ignore the quote line above, that's a forums error that copied over from Notepad and I can't seem to fix, sadly ^

"I can only assume that you have made this post as a troll?."

"You have" can be shortened to "you've" for ease of reading, and there's no need to put a full stop following your question mark. A question mark ends a sentence, so there's no need to then re-end it.

"Ignoring the fact that the English grammer in this hurts my brain,…"

Everyone in this thread is speaking English; there's no need to clarify that the grammar specifically is English. Also, grammar*.

"…you basicly want to removed every part of his power and turn him into an m1 killer…"

Firstly, basically*. Secondly, "remove" not "removed" - "you basically want to remove…". Minor point, too, but the M for M1 should be capitalised.

"…that can go stealth…"

The phrasing of "that can go stealth" is clunky - either go for "enter stealth" or "become stealthed", and instead of "can" the conditional "could" works better with the phrasing when using "that": "that could enter stealth".
Moreover, though, as the Wraith is a killer (a character and person, not a thing) the "that" is also not the best fit - you'll want to use "who", so while your "can" could be correct ("who can enter stealth/who can become stealthed") the "could" is still the best fit, IMO.

"…but then never have a benefit to that because of the insane debuff from uncloaking?"

This is missing a conditional clause, which was present in the last phrase (even when using "can"). "But then would never have a benefit" would work better.

Following this, you've got 2 line spacing, which can work if you're consistent, but in general you'll want to stick to just the one, particularly on these forums. Smaller line spacing can be accessed using shift + enter, so the double space is gramatically incorrect also. You can see what that looks like above.

"My assumption is that you have been destroyed by a good wraith player and just want him out of the game because entitled...."

Now this starts off promising (though again "you have" can be shortened to "you've" for easier reading, especially as these forums aren't generally hugely academic so contractions are allowed and often used, case in point), but you stumble near the end. The "just" is unnecessary to get your point across, though not hugely harmful to the sentence. There are, however, missing words between "because" and "entitled" - perhaps a "you're" wouldn't go amiss? "Because you're entitled" flows much better, but you've got some options here.
Also, an elipsis is only three - like this "…" - anything further is unnecessary and looks like the same issue with the question mark above - you're trying to end a sentence which the elipsis has already ended. While they can serve many purposes, and don't always end a sentence, in this case the general rules of grammar dictate that it ends that sentence specifically.
Finally, Wraith is a proper noun as it refers to a specific person, place, or thing, so therefore must always be capitalised.

"I do hope your post was a joke because if it is a serious suggestion then you need to take a break from dbd my dude…"

Very nearly correct, but "dbd" should be "DbD" because it's a shortening of "Dead by Daylight", which is capitalised. Also, the "my dude" is a separate clause, so should be separated with a comma; "…break from DbD, my dude,…" works much better.

"…because it's very clear your burnt out with dbd…"

You're using "it's" here, which is inconsistent with the rest of your answer. I'm aware I've corrected you not contracting before, but as here you are I'd advise that you pick one or the other - either go for a fully academic writing style, or use contractions constantly. To do otherwise reads poorly.
Also, it's "you're" and not "your". "You're" is a contraction of "you" and "are" - "because it is very clear you are burnt out…" - while "your" dictates that an object, place, person, or other thing belongs to the individual with whom you're speaking to. "Your burnt out" could work if it was instead "your burn out", as "burn" is then used as a noun and not a verb, however that would require further sentence restructing.
Finally, as before, it's "DbD" and not "dbd".

"…as of you're complaining about an of killer that is mid tier at best"

I'm not entirely sure what the "of" is supposed to be in either use - this simply isn't grammatically correct, and I'd suggest rewriting using a different word.
The good news? You've successfully used the correct "you're" here - why could you not do this earlier?
As you've contracted "you've" and "it's" above, contract "that is" to "that's" or uncontract the "it's" and "you're". Consistency is key.
Finally, you'll want to end on a full stop (or other related punctuation mark). For example: ".", "!", "?", "…" are all valid ways of ending a sentence.

Overall, I give it a 4/10, needs improvements. I'd advise working on your own grammatical standards before complaining about other people's. As the proverb goes, "Good writing is good editing, and vice-versa".