QUESTION (FR)

Yeah, I don't get threads like this. Pretty much everyone wants a smaller hitbox on his M2. That's both people playing him, and against him. Honestly, I don't even know who OP is talking crap to. Like you said, the players didn't ask for the massive hitbox.

I don't think you understand. They want killers to win most of their games with no skill. Killer is baby easy mode.

So what's your opinion on prayer tablet plague?

1. Where has it been said that console is the majority of the playerbase?
2. Even if that's the case, do you then just ignore everyone on PC's feedback, even though their experiences are just as valid?
3. The majority of the playerbase are survivor players (you need 4 of them for every 1 killer). According to your logic, the game should be centered around them and not killer players.

Just making the radius the hitscan latches onto survivors smaller would be nice. I feel like there needs to be some give in it given the combo of DBD's weird hitboxes (see ye olde hatchet explanation) and the second hit being meant to be a ranged attack done at up to 22m/s (if sliding) as this isn't an FPS and missing would then just yeet you somewhere else and put you on CD (so the consequences are quite steep compared to "shoot again").

It'd make using it to go round survivors when they're injured and just play around things more fun, too.

Who hasn't since that abomination got released? I've stopped playing.

The majority of DBD players are PC. I don't really know where that notion came from, lol.

Good catch, I didn't even notice that point lol.

Consoles are more accessible, so without concrete evidence - along with the introduction of cross progression.

Even then the talking point is that console players should get an inherent advantage when that shouldn't be the case at all.

Behavior saying that they put autoaim on the character doesn't hold water when compared to other ranged killers and they don't hold the same lethality as a Kaneki.

So, using that point (not you, the above poster) holds no argument here. There are people who play Siege on console with no auto aim and are perfectly fine, putting auto aim on a hit scan character was a bad decision and them saying it's for console players accessibility means nothing if it's not applied to other ranged killers, not accessible to PC players, or outright removing it (what I would advocate for) - you should not have an advantage over your opponent because of your platform choices or an auto aim being built into the character - the semantics of player base and who is the majority doesn't matter.

i agree on that the ghoul currently is in an unbalanced state. but i dissagree on bhvr babying the killer role when the majority of the "operation health" changes are given to survivors. Killers still lack the ability to see hookstates (it doesnt promote tunneling bc if a killer wants to tunnel theyll just remember the pfp) map design is a massive issue imo (this goes both ways: example badham and the dnd map). im happy to discuss this further as long as its done in a respectfull manner (non of this wah wah bhvr babies this or that)

Woah calm your horses i was not attacking you there i wholeheartingly agree that its needed. Sadly bhvr is kind of shooting themselves in the foot with their current killer/map design (wich both suck massivly imo) (sidenote attacking other forum users for their opnion on the matter does not help your statements!)

Most survivor games are lost, even against those killers you mentioned, because they don't really try, it happens so often that I win matches way more easily or even at all because 1-2 people give up for no reason. The problem is more that many survivors simply don't want to work for their win and give up as soon as it's a little harder.

If you really think that people only lose because of specific killers you're are missleaded, people put that on themself. Ken is the best current example, he is strong yes - but he's not even nearly as close at blight or nurse as some people want to tell you, people are getting better now at playing against him and it's way harder to win now. There are matches where you instantly win because someone gives up instantly or the people don't know how to play against him yet, but if they really try and know more or less how to play against him you have really good matches.

Also most streaks are a combination of bad matchmaking against people with several thousands of hours on a specific killer, of course people lose then, everything else would be more concerning in my opinion.

I still agree that the autoaim should be tonned down and hits through walls should be fixed, but other than that he's fine.

And lastly: you won't reach people if you start a conversation by insulting them with an comprehension not even remotely sensefull, people will rather place you on a spott of someone you can simply ignore. That's the wrong kind of attention xD

Thank you! I've been playing a bit of inZOI and a few other games while waiting for updates to The Ghoul. I'll return once the changes are made, but for now, I just can't bring myself to open DBD.