http://dbd.game/killswitch
let killers give up if all living players are in an exit gate
There is literally no reason for survs to stand around in the gate at endgame and yet they will do this almost every time to waste the killer's time/teabag. If survs can give up when they're all slugged killers should be able to give up once all remaining players are in a gate.
Comments
-
Honestly I posted something like this not that long ago. I do think it's really unfair that people can sit in exit gates or at the hatch and spam noise to try and rub it in the Killer's face like that, it has the same feeling to me anyway of being humped on the floor until bleedout. I definitely think endgame collapse isn't enough and that if any living Survs are in the gate past about 30 seconds, the Killer should be able to end the game gracefully to save time. This wouldn't punish people who wait to save friends, or people who leave immediately. It would not remove fun things like slug races, and it wouldn't remove healing in the gate. It WOULD however punish Survs that want to grief this way by removing their "you escaped" bonus.
6 -
Get some thicker skin and hit them out. Who cares if they bag.
-10 -
By that logic, let's remove the ability for the last living survivor to just leave the game the moment they are downed - who cares if the killer wants to mori then and forced the survivors to watch the mori animation.
0 -
Uncomparable reaching.
-1 -
I agree it’s so obnoxious when survivors do it, I only stay in the match until I know everyone is safe. Best thing you can do is spam your power for bloodpoints or go around the map breaking walls and pallets.
4 -
"Who cares?" Right now you see at minimum 2 people that care enough to go to this forum and post about it. It IS annoying and BM. There's literally 0 reason to NOT implement it from game health's perspective.
Giving extra option to BM the other side should be always removed if it does not clash with general gameplay. There's a good reason why limiting speed of crouching is bad idea (especially against ranged killers). By implementing that stuff, you loose actual gameplay. But giving option for killer to surrender when he's clearly and unmistakably lost? Why would you be against that? The only possible reason is if you do want to BM killer. And in that case… Good that you loose the option.
3 -
Bold to assume I do any of that.
It's also bold to assume Survivor are waiting at the Gates to bag if you never go there in the first place.
1 -
If they can manage to code it sure I do n't see an issue, it's just QoL for casual killers <3
It's really helped my survivor experience having the option to move on when the match is over and not needing to deal with being slugged and while I wouldnt use it on killer as I love when I get a #justleave moment, I think its fine for those who do want it1 -
How so? Both are at the very end of the match, and both are forcing the other player to stay a little longer just to "show off". Heck, survivors teabagging at the end of the match takes longer than a mori does.
1 -
I don’t see why not. They have the framework for it now that the Abandon feature exists and I can’t see this causing any problems. I say go they should go for it.
1 -
The person who dc becomes a bot and the killer still gets the mori still lol. That is exactly why am glad this feature is added no more bleeding out wasting people at 99% with dry humping then do it. Finally can stop seeing the stale boring animation over and over.
Post edited by buggybug on-2 -
That's not the point. They are saying it's fine to force the killer to have to stay in the game to watch survivors teabag at the exit gate. If that's the case, then the last survivor shouldn't be allowed to DC and be forced to watch the mori.
Point being, either way is dumb. If all survivors are at the exit gate, let the killer safely DC to move onto the next match just as the last survivors are allowed to DC to move onto the next match if everyone is down.
0
