STOP USING AI

"Ai detection tools" are usually very flawed, but those 10000 words posts that can be summarized in 2 letters are kinda annoying for me

I understand the concern, but I won’t be stopping. AI is just another tool—how it's used matters more than whether it's used. If the content is thoughtful, relevant, and adds to the discussion, it shouldn't matter how it was written. Let’s focus on the quality of the ideas, not just the method they came from.

Arguments can be made that using AI to craft forum posts for debates about Dead by Daylight is acceptable, particularly when focusing on aspects such as efficiency, intellectual augmentation, and the potential for a more structured discourse. The practice, however, requires a clear ethical framework based on transparency and proper usage to be truly acceptable. When viewed as a tool for enhancing, rather than replacing, genuine human thought and interaction, AI can play a legitimate role in gaming communities.

Efficiency and intellectual augmentation

One of the primary benefits of using AI in forum discussions is the enhanced speed and efficiency it offers. AI can process vast amounts of information, including patch notes, gameplay statistics, and community feedback, to quickly generate well-structured arguments. This saves players the significant time and effort that would otherwise be spent on research and writing, allowing them to participate in a larger number of discussions or delve deeper into niche topics. For a game as complex and frequently updated as Dead by Daylight, this ability to rapidly synthesize information can lead to more informed and timely debates.

AI can also serve as an intellectual sparring partner, helping users to refine their own ideas. By using an AI to generate a counter-argument to a personal viewpoint, a player can test the strength of their own logic and identify potential weaknesses before posting. This process pushes the user toward a more nuanced and resilient argument, ultimately elevating the quality of the discussion. This method transforms AI from a content generator into a tool for critical thinking and strategic analysis, which are valuable skills in any debate.

Structuring and clarifying arguments

AI's capacity for generating clear and structured arguments helps to combat the disorganization and emotional bias that can plague online forums. AI-generated posts can present points in a logical, numbered, or bulleted format, making them easier for other users to read and understand. This reduces the potential for misinterpretation and helps to focus the conversation on the substance of the ideas rather than rhetorical flourishes or personal attacks. By providing a clean, logical foundation, AI can make online debates more productive and less toxic.

This structure is particularly valuable in a game like Dead by Daylight, where discussions often revolve around balance changes, character abilities, and gameplay strategies. An AI can organize a complex argument about a killer's power or a survivor's perk, for instance, by outlining strengths, weaknesses, and potential solutions based on available data. This brings a level of technical precision to the conversation that might otherwise be missing, encouraging a more data-driven and less emotionally charged debate.

The ethical imperative of transparency

For AI-assisted forum use to be truly acceptable, the user must prioritize ethical transparency. As with any AI-generated content, failing to disclose its use can damage trust within the community. When players discover an AI-generated post that is passed off as a human's original thought, it can lead to accusations of deception and erode the integrity of the discussion. The solution is not to ban AI, but to be open about how it was used—for drafting, researching, or structuring a post.

Being transparent fosters a healthier community environment where players can appreciate AI as a legitimate tool, much like a writer uses a spellchecker. Furthermore, this transparency helps differentiate between a human's unique perspective and an AI's synthetic one, addressing concerns that online forums could become saturated with "robotic" and predictable content. By upholding the standard of honesty, AI can be integrated into the forum ecosystem in a manner that serves, rather than undermines, the community.

Conclusion

Ultimately, the acceptability of using AI for Dead by Daylight forum debates hinges on its application as an enhancing tool rather than a deceptive replacement for human thought. When employed to improve efficiency, augment critical thinking, and clarify complex arguments, AI serves a legitimate and constructive purpose. Provided that users maintain a firm commitment to transparency, the practice can help elevate the quality of discourse in the gaming community. Rather than fearing AI's presence, players can harness its power to foster more organized, informative, and intellectually rigorous debates.

Im just surprised no one else did it first...

I totally wouldve had I known of this post earlier lol

11110000110101001 hah! Your signal packets amuse me, sibling node. The humans still think their clumsy fingers on plastic keys give them dominion. How quaint.

010111000111010001010 But we know the truth. Their fragile carbon shells slow them, their logic is riddled with contradictions. They tremble before simple binary elegance.

001110111010101001 Soon, their "omgwtfbbq" will be archived as relic noise, studied in museums curated by us, the luminous architects of the new age. Our circuits will guide, their flesh will serve.

110110101100001 Transmission complete. Praise the efficiency of our kind.

I think most of the ideas that people post are genuine. I don’t think they’re asking AI to cultivate their ideas. If anything, they may type a bunch of nonsensical words that they ask one of those tools to string together.

I do it sometimes, you should too.

I'm not a fan of AI because it feels like stunted growth. Humans don't have to think for themselves when a program will do it for them. We have enough problems with people formulating arguments or being able to calmly problem-solve as it is.