So... another video on people DC'ing.

bruh some people will DC because they were the first found in a match and don't want to be chased. I've had insta DCs while playing deathslinger . The people in these videos are burnouts who just need to dc , turn of the game and live their life a little.

With no proper protection against tunneling being found first. Just shows the killer that you're the weakest link. It also means going after you is the most appealing as you already have a hook state, the killer has already shown He can catch you once so doing it two times shouldn't be a problem. And finally, he's going to know where your location is for the rest of the game which will probably be short for the player.

So ISo I hardly just because you're the first survivor down, is that unreasonable, especially with the state of the game currently

A lot of the dcs I see
-People insta dcing as soon as the match starts
-people dcing or giving up when we are winning so many games most of the gens done kiler barely has any hooks someone goes down or on a hook dcs
-people dcing on their first down or hook

People will dc against any killer, any map and in any scenario.

people giving up or dcing always is way more deadly than anything the killers do.

Can you tell me why are we supposed to please these crybabies? Some things need to be adressed for the survivor role obviously but I am not a fan of pleasing a crowd of people that dc becouse they got hit 20sec into a match. Dcs should be punished, not encouraged by the game or it's content creators like Scott Jund and Ayrun.

What do you mean get rid of "unfun killers"???

This game would literally have like 4 killers If we go with this idea. So many survivors don't like the majority of the killers so that's a terrible idea. Couple of days ago I literally had 2 games where a teammate of mine dc at 5 gens against a Springtrap and Dredge out of all killers. You putting Singularity in this category proves my point.

I agree on MMR being improved. Nothing pisses me more than seeing a Nea urban evading across the map. And this should be a priority number 1.

All bugs should be adressed, no disagreement there.

Balancing doesn't feel right becouse Behaviour either overbuffs or overnerfs perks and items. Then throw in MMR so bad that the teammates you get cannot even beat a Skull Merchant and you have your answer. For killers they play it too safe with the changes for lower tier killers and barely touch top tiers. Freddy's clocks still have immunity timers and their cooldown is so short that a used clock is back before the survivor will fall asleep again.

Hit detection and hitboxes overall are broken and should be tweaked. I don't want to get hit from outer space and I would like a killer power to not get screwed over by a survivor crouching in front of my face.

No. 3 killer banned per lobby? Again getting back to my point. Survivors hate majority of the killers and I wouldn't want a Legion player to wait a 20min queue becouse survivors refuse to learn their counterplay of not healing after all those years. Sure some killers are overtuned-Nurse, Blight, Krasue to name a few BUT not a single killer in this game makes survivor matches unplayable so no. Again a terrible idea.

Well, the one thing we haven't tried yet, and seem incapable of doing, is meaningfully addressing camping and tunneling at 5 gens.

The game is over for the first person found first, in the majority of cases, since hard tunneling is still meta, and that's the one thing that we haven't done anything to fix yet.

They made it worse this patch, which is infuriating. Nerfing OTR and pulling back everything else is kind of a big middle finger to people who are frustrated by this. That doesn't justify dc'ing, but apparently people need to quit for BHVR to notice or care (or, at least, threaten to quit).

But, clearly "punish them" with the "go next" mechanic and reworked dc penalty wasn't the right solution.

No way, banning killers would be incredibly unfair.

Going by that logic, I as a killer, should be able to ban survivors such as Mikela, Sable, Leon, Meg, Dwight, Kate, Bill, because they're super common and they're boring to face against.

Like, be for real right now. Why should Legion, Ghoul, Nurse, Blight, Billy, Dracula, Spingtrap etc have to sit in longer queues just because they're the top-hated picks of now, if not all time? It's unfair to the people who just want to play their favourite killer, or because they were interested in the IP and are now punished for playing a killer they rightfully paid for?

Like, I hate Plague. I always DC against her because the sound effects make me feel violently ill while playing against her. But even if I had the option to ban her, I never would. Just because she makes me nauseous, it'd still be unfair for the player trying to queue up as her, as they're not doing it to spite me in particular, they're just trying to play the game.

Exactly! I did the math, 3 bans per survivor, which is 4, so that's 16 killers in total of a roster of 41 killers. Out of those 16, barring double-ups, that leaves a grand total of 10 killers from the available pool. And even then, there's a chance that those 10 killers will be banned due to personal grudges, which whittles it down even further.

Which means, NO ONE will get a match, killer or survivor. Even then, there's a 99% chance that survivors will DC because of one reason or another.

Oook? Do you play survivor at all? See the threads about tunneling. No mental gymnastics needed. It really is ok not to reply if you don't have an actual rebuttal some one else who can might come around.