Kill Switch update: We have temporarily disabled The Legion due to an issue that allows for infinite power spam. The Legion will be re-enabled once this issue is fixed.

http://dbd.game/killswitch

Healing and Diminishing Returns in BHVR's Own Words

crogers271
crogers271 Member Posts: 3,437

stacking them has diminishing returns.

-

I knew this post from Peanits existed, but I really didn't expect to see the words diminishing returns perfectly in there.

-

I don't think nerfing perk stacking for heals is going to break the game or anything, but its just silly. The way healing perks work they already have diminishing returns and that was something BHVR recognized in the past.

Comments

  • Rokku_Rorru
    Rokku_Rorru Member Posts: 3,260

    So, are the new values going to replace how this works or is it going to be stacked on top of this making running multiple healing perks absoloutley awful

  • Rogue11
    Rogue11 Member Posts: 2,117

    This also results in wild differences in value between similar perks. Like autodidact would presumably be way more valuable with another healing perks because it adds flat heal progress instead of increasing speed. But like why should autodidact be the default choice to combo with another healing perk instead of 2 speed increase perks?

  • crogers271
    crogers271 Member Posts: 3,437

    You're correct. I've tried to keep this to just healing, but in this case its a problem that will exist for the way they approach the other regressions as well.

    On Healing - while its not a huge thing to me, probably the most complained about is Resurgence and a single heal perk. This won't do anything about that.

    Or if we look to gen progression. Resilience and Deja Vu will weaken each other, but Deja and Fast Track, or Deja and Hyperfocus+Stakeout will be unchanged (and there are similar examples on the gen regression side). If we presume for the sake of argument that BHVR is correct and these things need addressed, its a horrible way to approach it as survivors/killers can still do it, they just have less build diversity to accomplish the same goal.

  • AmpersandUnderscore
    AmpersandUnderscore Member Posts: 3,105

    Yeah this feels like an under considered area. Especially with them standardizing the "charges" system, which has diminishing returns built in.

    Now I do agree that what we have isn't completely sufficient, since it would still be ideal to have upper and lower bounds to things like gen and heading speeds, but I'm not convinced this is the way to do it.