Toxic killers

Okay, so maybe a hot take, maybe just an opinion.. i think killers who hold the game hostage by downing the next to last survivor and slugging them should be banned from matchmaking the same as a survivor who quits a match.

Comments

  • MarbleThrone
    MarbleThrone Member Posts: 1,166

    Who is being held hostage here, exactly?

    The downed survivor bleeds out in four minutes.

  • Elan
    Elan Member Posts: 2,640

    If they want 4k, they want 4k. There are a lot of competitive players trying to hold kill rate as high as possible and if they gonna lose a game they must get the 4th kill if they can. Nothing toxic, it's just completing objective. It's like if you say that survivors who finish last gen are toxic, makes no sense.

  • Thirteen
    Thirteen Member Posts: 87

    Maybe stop hiding edge map on a match that is clearly lost. You are wasting your own time by being idle, just get a decent last chase and go next.

  • KatsuhxP
    KatsuhxP Member Posts: 1,919

    I ask because it's not clear:

    Do you mean letting both of them bleed out, or do you just mean slugging the second last person to search for the last one?

    The first option is kinda reasonable but also not really because people can in theorie just make themself unhookable. I'm gonna be honest with you, if you simply make yourself unhookable with a perk I will just bleed you out - I won't let you escape or let the match go longer because you decide to use perks to annoy me.

    Second option is a hard no. If I want to search for the last person I will do that - I personally don't do that mostly except for people that annoyed me, but I will do that then.

    Lastly it would probably super unreliable to detect.

  • Rulebreaker
    Rulebreaker Member Posts: 2,927

    That's bull.

    Who's the one leaving the 3rd survivor on the dirt?

    Who's the one denying any chance to continue the game?

    Who's the one who's already basically won?

    Do as you will as killer but the blame is largely on the killer for stalling and wasting everyone's time. Not the survivor.

    As much as I would enjoy that, it would be a bit unfair, as said above hard to detect reliability, and there's ultimately better ways to solve this problem that the community has mentioned previously (HINT DEVS HINT).

  • sky_9
    sky_9 Member Posts: 28

    The killer gave the survivor a perfect win, isn't that great?