Does not letting the last survivor go make me a bad person?
Story time: Playing as GF on badham I get a 4k, since the two remaining people are on the hook I go back and forth teabagging while moonwalking for memes :P. After that I get a message saying that I lack morals because I didn't let the last survivor go and that my teabagging was very offensive. I responded back a few times asking how not letting someone escape in a video game means I lack morals then he says "video games show people's true colors and you should let someone escape because it's common courtesy". I responded a few more times and he just kept saying I lack morals and am a horrible person lmao. So does not letting the last survivor get hatch mean I lack morals?
Comments
-
No. It doesn’t really matter. You don’t need to play to anyone’s standards EXCEPT your own.
2 -
Yes. You are truly despicable and you should repent!
4 -
Short answer: no
Long answer: absolutely not
1 -
NO MERCY
1 -
Agreed.
1 -
Let me ask you this...
How often did a Survivor offer to be sacrificed because you had a bad game?
4 -
Not at all. Sometimes I let the last person go if there was a dc or if i thought they played well, but I usually want those bloodpoints.
0 -
For me it happens, but less often than killers letting the last survivor go. Probably because if the killer gets 3 kills then does letting the 4th go really affect anything? Nah. But a random survivor sacrificing his life is 5k BP plus potentially an item and add ons.
They are not really comparable tbf.
0 -
Strike first and strike hard and show....
3 -
I told him that in my short discussion with him and he proceeded to say I lacked brain cells for comparing the 2 LUL
0 -
To me they definitely are comparable.
We weren't talking about BP after all.
0 -
Makes you a killer, killer.
0 -
Ahh, the usual "I want my opinions as facts" protection.
0 -
Noone-"does not letting the survivor go make me a bad person"
Survivors- the cops are already on the way you sick #$@!
0 -
No. It means you did your job as Killer and someone was being a salty loser.
0 -
Okay well BP is relevant whether or not you want to talk about it lol
If you can't see how losing 1 kill out of 4 isn't as bad as losing your entire life then you're just biased.
Edit: did it backwards
0 -
Your tea-bagging was just pouring salt into their wounds, but you aren't awful for getting a 4K. If you're worried about making people feel bad, you shouldn't teabag them.
0 -
Tbag is toxic.
Killing people is just doing your objective.
1 -
It certainly isn't relevant as more than enough of them don't care about their Items & BP since they'll happily disconnect once they're on the losing side or just not having fun.
Losing the life also doesn't remove all that you've gained. It's a neat bonus, but one i've seen many happily give up to help others instead or just leave the quick DC way.
No bias here.
0 -
Killing people is bad. Just saying.
0 -
-
The Killer option is just a trap that sends your personal information to your local police station so they know whose door to break down in the next 15 minutes.
1 -
One of my personal favorite things to do, when possible, is hook and kill the last Survivor right by the open Hatch.
7 -
Understandable.
0 -
Gotta do something to make the last 2 quit struggling coulda done it anytime. But I agree was slightly toxic
0 -
If we are talking about real life I would have to agree. But we are talking about a video game.
0 -
No...?
I don't understand people sometimes.
Edit: Not you, the angry guy.
1 -
Aaah, I guess I better not start any controversial discussions by saying "it's never alright" and try to speculate on that argument :P I'll just say that never forget, why you're "allowed" to do that in the game.
0 -
I'd be fine with that sort of discussion as long as we could keep it civil :P although let's not because we could get banned for discussing politics and controversies outside of the game I think.
0 -
If the last survivor is down and everyone else is dead, I look for the hatch and close it. I don't spare them, but if they have adrenaline they have a chance of escaping. Makes things more interesting. Other than that, I only spare people if in certain situations where I think they truly deserve mercy, like if two people DC'd early.
0 -
One of the best things as killer is , if you managed to control the match you decide their destiny.
2 -
I hope they reported you
0 -
Same ,I deserve to be punished for not letting them go!
1 -
Did you report yourself with video evidence of your crimes?
1 -
@KillermainBTWm8 While I don't believe in being toxic in chat in a video game, t-bag away. If that offends them, perhaps they shouldn't be playing an online PvP game. That crap has been around forever and isn't going anywhere. I also don't care about the personal feelings of random and faceless internet people, either, to that type of degee.
0 -
Sadly I do not have footage of me teabagging away whilst moonwalking trying to get them to stop struggling ):
1 -
Teabagging isn't something I often do. The reason I decided to teabagging was because A. I was bored
B. One of them was on their first hook and decided to wait out the whole timer and if they really were mad they should've just stopped struggling.
0 -
@KillermainBTWm8 No worries. I'm almost 47 years old. Before Overwatch launched in May 2016, I didn't play PvP games at all. Most I did was PvP as a side thing in MMOs, which was my main gaming genre from 1999-2016. So, I never dealt with the t-bagging and other crap prevalent in shooters and PvP games.
I don't t-bag, but getting t-bagged doesn't bother me. I will tunnel and facecamp a t-bagging survivor, though. Not because I'm tilted or offended, but just because I know that in a majority of instances, that's the effect they're going for. So, I figure if they want to play like immature children, I'll punish them like a child and remove them from the match. Depending on how early in the match it is, they might even get very little BP and a depip as an added bonus. 😁
1
