*Deleted Post*
Comments
-
enduring should simply effect it again but in my opinion any stun time below 5 seconds would make it pointless
1 -
No, 2.5 seconds is literally nothing.
0 -
I don’t think DS needs nerfed currently.
1 -
eeh...
it should get tweaked a bit imo.
i just hate to get D striked by the guy who unhooked the other one.
welp, guess i shouldnt tunnel.
ill just go hit some rocks then...
0 -
decisive is becoming necessary to use sometimes
1 -
It seems to me the devs are happy with leaving Decisive Strike's stun, which was increased due to Enduring affecting it back then, at 5 seconds, even though Enduring now doesn't affect Decisive Strike.
2.5 is microscopic though, that would remind me of the days where DS was close to useless against Enduring.
0 -
I think enduring should counter it, but the base stun remain the same
1 -
Didnt they raise the stun duration because of enduring... then nerf enduring to make it only pallet stuns... and then keep the ads stun duration the same? Lol
Dont get me wrong, its eay better than old ds... but still. C'maaaan.
0 -
Yeah that's what they did, they should make enduring counter it again
0 -
Yes it really does, it's one of the best Perks in the game rn
0 -
That's all you can do unless you have to wait for what seems like a day
0 -
If we’re nerfing things just because they’re the best then PGTW and ruin should be nerfed too. (Not being serious but that is the problem with nerfing things because they are some of the best.
0 -
No but they raised the stun and made enduring not effect it, all I'm saying is make the stun time what it used to be
0 -
But then it would hardly feel punishing to be hit by it.
0 -
. Make enduring not counter D Strike
. Reduce stun time to 3 seconds
0 -
DS doesn’t bother me as killer so I wouldn’t nerf it.
0
