The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

Do you feel that Survivors get preferential treatment over Killers, or vice-versa?

Levitika
Levitika Member Posts: 230

For the sake of balance, gameplay, bug fixing, and just general content improvement, do you feel one gets more attention than the other? Be civil if you disagree.

Do you feel that Survivors get preferential treatment over Killers, or vice-versa? 43 votes

Survivors get more attention
65%
GibberishNoxeriasdaddyoMegaWaffleDolphin9192snowflake102FridalmanacCyberianFauxlewfairbrotherBrucecastro81fly_172anonymous31337MasterTaterRin_is_my_waifuFilledPizzaEndstilleKillerMonkey236toxicjeffmain123The_Meh_TehSirumal 28 votes
Killers get more attention
9%
beoriseyoMrsGhostfaceBlackRainbowPok 4 votes
Neither. Cosmetics, y'all.
18%
FoggyDownpourOnryosTapeRentalsJetTheWaffleCatTapeKnotXxkuroxshiroxXTaigatoxicmeggDetailedDetriment 8 votes
Bugs get fixed?
6%
AnvertoAhoyWolf[Deleted User] 3 votes

Comments

  • MegaWaffle
    MegaWaffle Member Posts: 4,172
    Survivors get more attention

    While I would like to believe its a 50/50 split there are several factors at play.

    1: Survivors make up a larger portion of the player base and (like it or not) decisions will be slightly skewed towards them intentionally or not as a company needs to make money to survive and thrive no matter how much they love their players.

    2: Some issues may be an easier fix than others making it seem like BHVR is working on one side more than another.

    3: Its difficult to not harbor feeling one way or another when many people complain for 1 side or the other and many may be subject to seeing/finding "evidence" to support the mindset they share.

    I have to say from personal experience it seems many killer related problems take far longer to address (sounds are a great example) where I see survivor related problems getting fixed quickly (Tinker 2 no TR issue). Even though I want to stay neutral on the subject I have to say I have been pulled into the poll option I have chosen. I hope to be proven wrong moving forward but my mind has drifted to this position through observation.

    At the end of the day BHVR can do as they please and I can decide if I wish to give them my time as a player or not.

  • daddyo
    daddyo Member Posts: 48
    Survivors get more attention

    Survivors. I don't think BHVR has a malicious intent, but survivor mains outnumber killer mains so their voices are always gonna be heard more.

  • Fibijean
    Fibijean Member Posts: 8,342

    I'm voting for the secret option that's just a neutral "no", because I'm not sure what the point you're trying to make about cosmetics is there but I have my suspicions, and if I'm correct then I don't agree with that option either.

  • Fibijean
    Fibijean Member Posts: 8,342

    Ah, so there wasn't really a "no" option? My point stands, then - I still want to vote for the neutral "no" option that isn't there.

  • anarchy753
    anarchy753 Member Posts: 4,212

    I also vote no, I think the devs do what they think will bring the game closer to the impossible "balance."

    Sometimes killers take a hit, sometimes survivors do, sometimes something randomly gets buffed for no rational reason, like Borrowed Time.

    All in all I don't think they go in with the mentality of "how do we ######### over killers today?" or vice versa.

  • BlackRainbow
    BlackRainbow Member Posts: 40
    Killers get more attention

    No. It's either that way or the other sometimes. There's a time where killer get stuff and then there's also a time where surv do get stuff..

    So I will say both.

  • DetailedDetriment
    DetailedDetriment Member Posts: 2,632
    Neither. Cosmetics, y'all.

    They get an equal amount of attention, it's just that killers get the short end of the stick.