Thats it....I quit until they fix this bs
Its literally gotton worse and its to the point where I refuse to play this stupid game.....every single killer match (rank 11) I get red ranks and every survivor match (rank 7) I get rank 20-15 teammates......PLEASE FIX THIS GAME
Comments
-
Oddly enough, the ranking system is designed to link you with survivors with 10 ranks of you, so this is a sad excuse where the system is working properly under it's current condition. Not to say I agree with being paired up with red ranks when you're in green ranks. I get red and purple ranks when I'm a rank 15 killer though.
3 -
see you in months then, LeL.
8 -
I keep having the opposite problem (I'm Red Ranked 1; I don't think I've played a Red Rank today, let alone someone at Level 1). A lot of Yellow and Green people are my opponents today.
Which is great for me with the Anniversary Cakes (and at least somewhat great for the people I'm playing as I have become a lot more merciful with hooks and letting people escape) but I could absolutely understand why it is super annoying.
I know the devs have said they've been working on a fix but this has been going on for months now. You'd figure there could be some kind of adjustment/hot fix to band-aid the problem until they setup their brand new matchmaking system or something...
3 -
When did they ever say 10? It was always 6 ranks of you (or highest rank if in SWF) and then it broke (of lowest rank when in SWF), twice(games were taking forever so they opened up so everyone could get into a match with anyone), around Christmas, they tried to fix it but it's been an absolute mess ever since.
8 -
Don't you just love how they prioritise a Billy nerf and perk changes over fixing their matchmaking that is being complained about literally every day.
Post edited by CronaWins on17 -
What exactly does your comment have to do with the OP complaint? How does noed have anything at all to do with bhvr’s ass matchmaking. Please enlighten all of us.
62 -
Damn, you edgy!
30 -
Even if the killer has horrible mobility and need that added buff?
13 -
Just like no one cares about your thoughts.
His complaint is just as valid as anyone elses
41 -
I mean you're playing Bubba. You cant really expect to do much better than that past green ranks. Possible? Yeah. But its ######### Bubba. Smart players wont let him get anywhere.
Plus you GOT TWO KILLS.
You had LITERALLY THE BALANCE THE DEVS WANT while being outranked, and you're complaining?
Cry me a river..
12 -
I dont understand why NOED is a problem. You can just cleanse the totems
9 -
Look, someone blaming ranks for their loss again.
Once again - SURVIVOR RANKS ARE A PARTICIPATION TROPHY. Any green rank players you would play against will easily be at red rank in a matter of hours. There's next to no difference.
3 -
Hey you still did pretty well... 2k against 4 red ranks.
3 -
You got half of them. That’s entitled thinking you deserve 4K every game. It’s actually too EASY for the killer. As a survivor you REALLY have to rely on your teammates and more often than not it’s not going to end in a W. It’s not fun for survivors atm they don’t fix things that are problems imo. Vault hitboxes are broken. Clear a vault and take a few steps you still get hit. Ridiculous. Teammates leave you on hook. Tunneled. Camped. It’s not fun. I wish they did more for survivors to make it longer but more enjoyable. As for killer it’s the best you’re out there by yourself! Nobody to rely on. Develop a strategy to be efficient at gen pressure!
5 -
Love all the survivors defending this.
Worse, blaming them for their killer/perk choices, as if something is their fault.
Typical.
9 -
Because the current state of matchmaking makes survivors happy.
4 -
I love the way every stupid survivor says:" well he got 2 kills so he cant complain". No he cant but that means he should be red rank as well and not killing green ranks survivors when matchmaking works fine.
0 -
LOL? That is so cliche. I can't.
OP I get matches like this a lot too. I agree with the others you did do well, I mean 2k is considered balanced. So perhaps give yourself a little credit. New MMR is coming, so hopefully it'll change things up. Just have to wait and see.
1 -
Imagine thinking ranks dont matter just because its "easy to rank up." Rank one survivors with possibly thousands of hours EACH, versus a green rank with MAYBE a couple hundred hours. Sure. That's definitely fair. Ranks matter.
4 -
The whole "2 kills = balanced" thing is kinda weird. 2 kills is often a sign that the killer actually got outplayed pretty hard.
Yeah, I know that sounds strange, but it's actually not too hard to still sneak in 1-2 endgame kills on a team that's knocking out gens and escaping fast. Or to knock out the weaker links later in the match. (Notice even the dead guys got a ton of points.)
I know, I know. "But the devs said..." Well, there's what the devs say, and then there's how the game actually plays, what it actually rewards, and how it feels to the players. When I play survivor, two people getting out feels like a big win. As a killer, two people getting out feels awful, and survivors are usually quite happy about it.
Not to mention how the emblems add up. I know the emblems are broken as hell, but they absolutely tilt toward a killer getting more than two kills. Whereas escaping isn't actually even that significant for survivors. (Typically silver vs. gold on a single emblem)
It's a weird situation. I really don't think that the "2 kills/2 out = balanced" stuff tells the whole story.
1 -
Lol and I play solo as a rank 1 survivor and get paired with rank 11 killers BUT there is 3 rank 20s. So I stand no chance really. Matchmaking is totally broken lately.
3 -
Thats how it has been for the last year now. Play killer and its sweaty tryhard swf, play survivor and you get rank 15-20 survivors who just crouch around the edge of the map all game
1 -
Yep pretty much this. Literally every killer match I play turns into a sweatfest that requires me to start injecting Adrenaline into my system just to keep up. And survivor. Jeez do not get me started on how many red rank idiots there are. How they even reached that rank is beyond me.
5 -
Yeah. My brother was playing Survivor the other day, and I was watching and giving him some tips. He ended up getting put into a game with a Rank 17, 2, 3 and the Killer was a Rank 5. He is Rank 19. The MM hasn't ever been super amazing, but this is pretty upsetting to see.
3 -
as a green rank killer wich means he is not experienced i found that ok. also he is right they are 10 levels above him still somehow he is forced to play agaisnt that. the perks have nothing to do with this topic.
2 -
I can't blame people for running NOED with the current match making given that its the only thing at times that will let you get any kills due to the massive skill cap.
6 -
Run Ruin +suirvellance + bbq + M&A. You already know what youre doing with add ons.
0 -
"Your valid point is made invalid by the tools provided by the game that you use."
5 -
I mean, that doesn't change the issue. Matchmaking is busted and things need better balancing. People shouldn't have to play the top 5 to rank up.
2 -
Imagine being that much of an ignorant entitled survivor. Noed is part of the game. Being matched up with people 2 divinions ahead of you isn't or perhaps shouldn't be.
Grow up
4 -
LOL. Why people can't see the issue here?
"You got 2k"... you're missing the point
"You're using Bubba"... you're missing the point
"You're using NOED"... you're missing the point.
The point is... He's a green rank and he was set up with red ranks. If you ever hit red ranks you would know how different that is from green ranks. If he's in green ranks it means he is not that good to be paired with red ranks, yet he managed somehow to kill two of them, wich instead of saying "you're not entitled to 4K" I would say, it's great that even if you were set up with red ranks, players who are far experienced than you, you still managed to have 2K
9 -
Second game of the night, woo! Complete with teabags for all.
(First game was 3 reds and a 16)
So fun and interactive. I definitely walk away from this game every night feeling great about the experiences, I sure do.
11 -
i don't know must be the one many survivor that hate noed and use DS BT SB DH so many of 2nd change i wont list.
0 -
i sure it was a pain in the bad word to get that two kills sure noed helped tho most gen rush don't do bone like they should.
0 -
in a way he didn't lose dev said good game is 2 dead 2 get out.
in a way he didn't lose or win.
0 -
how you think 4 people getting out feels i in rank 8 killer 1 out of 3 game they gen rush all get because of BT DS body blocking oh i got 99% door so they make sure they all get out.
edit i take the 2 kills out 3 i don't need 4k all the time 0k hurts.
0 -
Time for a cookie cutter response to a cookie cutter post:
Ranks are not indicative of skill. The devs themselves say this.
The way it comes off when people make posts like this is "these people were too good for me, it's matchmaking's fault!" If you "lost," it's because you made too many mistakes in the game.
I just can't wait to see the next excuse people are going to bring up once they ditch this current ranking system for their upcoming MMR system and people can't be confused by meaningless numbers.
1 -
Well, rank definitely means SOMETHING.
It's not a perfect granular thing, but a rank 1 survivor is clearly miles ahead of a rank 18 killer. No legitimate matchmaking should ever pair the two, and yet the rank 1 can actually choose to face the rank 18 killer if they wish.
(Although, hey, the rank 1 probably got there beating up on rank 18 killers! Hah.)
6 -
It's not only for killers like that. My girlfriend recently Started gaming. She is rank 16 and enjoys playing survivor. But she also sended me screenshots when she versed a red rank killer with over 2k hrs.
0 -
I mean, he got 2 kills against red ranks. That's how the game is designed to be, 2 kills and 2 escapes. Idk why he is crying, he just showed us how he won against red ranks.
0 -
ok it is easy to rank up as survivor but another fact is survivor very easy to play even in solo (sometime) SWF pretty much borderline cheating
swf is worse with OoO.
0 -
He got 2 kills against red ranks, maybe he wants to say that noed helped him for the kills
0 -
Yeah, but most posts about this kind of thing are not about a rank 20 being matched with all rank 1s. It's usually a purple or green rank against red ranks, which is far from impossible. People who complain about that sort of matchmaking are simply just less skilled than their opponents and are looking for some sort of scapegoat to point their finger at.
You know what I say when I go up against red ranks and don't do well? I say "well damn I screwed up a lot that game," or "those guys were really good" or sometimes even "I simply didn't have as good of a setup" if they're all running the most OP things and I'm sitting there with all rank 1 perks or something. In other words, I don't go blaming it on the fact that I may be in green/purple ranks (I am indeed usually in green/purple as killer, and still manage to get 4k against red rank survivors when I want to. It's not impossible.)
I also disagree that just because a killer's or survivor's rank is 18 or anything low like that, that it automatically gives them a disadvantage. That means that they haven't played in a while and decayed, or that they simply don't play enough to raise their rank yet. Point being, while skill might give you high rank, having a high rank doesn't give you skill. I've seen rank 18 players that play like rank 1 and rank 1 players that play like rank 18. so I get your point, but I disagree ultimately.
I know it means "something." That doesn't mean that rank is any measure of skill.
2 -
Noed does absolutely nothing. Gets clensed right away.
3 -
I know what you mean, as I can hit red rank more easily as survivor than I can as killer, simply because survivors can rank up playing a more passive role and holding M1 on a generator. I don't even play SWF.
Regardless of if I'm red rank on survivor and green/purple usually as killer (both are true) I wouldn't use either rank to justify the amount of skill I have. I would consider myself realistically maybe a mid tier killer, at least as of now while I'm still leveling things and using mediocre addons. That doesn't mean that if I go against red ranks that I stand no chance. As survivor or killer.
I don't even think it matters what's easier to "rank up" with anyway, because as I (and the devs) have said, rank is not indicative of skill anyway. Whether one is easier to play than the other or not is irrelevant, because all that matters at the end of the day is whether you're good enough to beat your opponent or not. The pip system should not ever be an excuse to blame your loss on. It's because you weren't good enough as a player usually.
I know there are some cases where things are really turned against you (like being camped into a 1st hook mori or something) but in most realistic scenarios that isn't the case.
0 -
they can't they got to keep gen rushing come here bad word about noed when they could of just did bones.
0 -
That's true lol when I used to run it I would down one person and then poof gone. I never understood the people who argue against it.
1 -
People who complain about that sort of matchmaking are simply just less skilled than their opponents and are looking for some sort of scapegoat to point their finger at.
Well, yes. That's the point. They're far less skilled than their much higher ranked opponents. That's not enjoyable for the losing party, and maybe not even for the winning party. Especially not for new players.
Any good matchmaking system should at least make an effort to keep that from happening. I know it's probably a lot harder in DbD, but this might be the only game that I've ever seen that seems to actively try to create bad matchmaking experiences.
We'll see when the new MM comes out, though.
2 -
MM joke i don't have to much hope for the new MM coming.
0 -
Yes, the MM is all over the place right now, but who really cares? Yes, the general idea is the higher your rank, the more experience and skill you’ve obtained. However, this is NOT true. Looks to me like you Mr. Rank 10 killed 2 of the survivors with a crappy killer. A draw is an acceptable worse case scenario for any killer player. I’m sure we’d all rather have a draw than only kill 1, or even none.
0