Killer Mains VS Survivor Mains
Comments
-
Nah, can't have that.
The salt wars must continue.
6 -
I think you don't understand. Even if both sides were to coexist, there still would be that small majority of survivor mains that think the game is perfectly fine. And some killer mains that think the game is not. There is no in between, there will still be survivor mains like Angrypug and Jendenise who have a skewed point of view of the game because they only play one side and say everything is perfect. There will still be salty people in the end game chat who want to bring you down because you killed them in a video game. There is nothing that can be done about it. As much as we want to change it, there is nothing that can be done about it.
3 -
This content has been removed.
-
@Mycroft said:
Until that changes. Until there is some give and take, and not just take take take there can be no rainbows and puppies.I don't think anybody is asking for hugs and puppies, but it would be nice if people could just stop being so savage towards each other. Survivors AND killers. We don't have to agree with each other, we'll always have different views (and no my views aren't always leaning to the survivor side). There is indeed a lot wrong with balance, but there is also something wrong with how communication goes. Someone writes a post and you can guarantee, killer or survivor, someone has a salty comment on hand because throwing insults or vehement blame is just far more tasty than a constructive dialogue for some people.
From what i have seen, survivors and killers have been flinging their *@%$ at each other since the game started, and nothing has changed. Nuff said.
I do my best when it comes to games, i don't do what most killers call toxic, and i'll congratulate a good game whether i win or i lose. Can't fix the whole community, so i guess i'll stick to keeping my corner of it clean.
2 -
Wait, so the game can be played without survivors? 🤔Mycroft said:No, there really isn't any "both need each other" about it. If killers didn't play the game there would be no game.
5 -
Well it can start by just a few of us that read this changing our attitudes towards the opposite side... Killers HAVE to kill and Survivors HAVE to survive. Each side has to do what they gotta do and thats counter each other.. as soon as people get that, the sooner we can get this broken train back on its tracksDetective_Jonathan said:I think you don't understand. Even if both sides were to coexist, there still would be that small majority of survivor mains that think the game is perfectly fine. And some killer mains that think the game is not. There is no in between, there will still be survivor mains like Angrypug and Jendenise who have a skewed point of view of the game because they only play one side and say everything is perfect. There will still be salty people in the end game chat who want to bring you down because you killed them in a video game. There is nothing that can be done about it. As much as we want to change it, there is nothing that can be done about it.
2 -
Right.... I'm so confused.brokedownpalace said:
Wait, so the game can be played without survivors? 🤔Mycroft said:No, there really isn't any "both need each other" about it. If killers didn't play the game there would be no game.
2 -
@Detective_Jonathan said:
I think you don't understand. Even if both sides were to coexist, there still would be that small majority of survivor mains that think the game is perfectly fine. And some killer mains that think the game is not. There is no in between, there will still be survivor mains like Angrypug and Jendenise who have a skewed point of view of the game because they only play one side and say everything is perfect. There will still be salty people in the end game chat who want to bring you down because you killed them in a video game. There is nothing that can be done about it. As much as we want to change it, there is nothing that can be done about it.Kind of the point of this post..
1 -
Apparently, who would’ve thought!brokedownpalace said:
Wait, so the game can be played without survivors? 🤔Mycroft said:No, there really isn't any "both need each other" about it. If killers didn't play the game there would be no game.
All this time waiting 30 minutes for survivors to join my lobby and start the game when I could have played without them!3 -
^ This 👍🏾SoylentPixie said:@Mycroft said:
Until that changes. Until there is some give and take, and not just take take take there can be no rainbows and puppies.I don't think anybody is asking for hugs and puppies, but it would be nice if people could just stop being so savage towards each other. Survivors AND killers. We don't have to agree with each other, we'll always have different views (and no my views aren't always leaning to the survivor side). There is indeed a lot wrong with balance, but there is also something wrong with how communication goes. Someone writes a post and you can guarantee, killer or survivor, someone has a salty comment on hand because throwing insults or vehement blame is just far more tasty than a constructive dialogue for some people.
From what i have seen, survivors and killers have been flinging their *@%$ at each other since the game started, and nothing has changed. Nuff said.
I do my best when it comes to games, i don't do what most killers call toxic, and i'll congratulate a good game whether i win or i lose. Can't fix the whole community, so i guess i'll stick to keeping my corner of it clean.
0 -
On a totally unrelated note...I adore that gif
1 -
Lol right? Its so cuteSoylentPixie said:On a totally unrelated note...I adore that gif
0 -
First, I love this gif, and two, I completely agree. Killers need survivors and survivors need killers. Our goal should be to make sure that both sides are having fun, not turn the community into a war zone.
1 -
Yes!!ShrimpTwiggs said:First, I love this gif, and two, I completely agree. Killers need survivors and survivors need killers. Our goal should be to make sure that both sides are having fun, not turn the community into a war zone.
0
