Map design discussion.

Options
Terro
Terro Member Posts: 1,171

Anyone think it would be better if they just designed the maps more around quantity instead of quality of tiles? Just only have 1 or 2 strong/god pallets. Then have a massive amount of unsafe pallets and a bunch of weak tiles.

Comments

  • Leachy_Jr
    Leachy_Jr Member Posts: 2,137
    Options

    Fractured cowshed is the best example of how chained tiles can make you lose a game.

  • Terro
    Terro Member Posts: 1,171
    Options

    So do you prefer what they're currently doing with a limited number of strong tiles (quality) or would you prefer a larger number of weaker tiles (quantity)?

  • dezzmont
    dezzmont Member Posts: 481
    edited December 2020
    Options

    Its interesting because what we are seeing is the number of weak tiles sorta doesn't matter, those just determine how well branched the strong tiles are, and good killers can overpower that. It also sucks to have too many strong tiles, but it matters WAY more the density of high quality tiles. Basically, there is a third axis beyond 'strength of tile' and 'number of resources on the map overall' that is how clustered tiles are together that is actually way more important than either other metric.

    This explains why old Autohaven, Chillwind, and Lampkin lane are so ridiculous: all 3 of those maps had jungle gym upon jungle gym with pretty minimal distance to each other, or in the case of Lampkin lane full on vertical loops in literally every house which meant winning a really trivial 50/50 due to strong super tall walls or full indoor-outdoor transitions made the entire map effectively a 'weak infinite.' And that matters way more than the fact that say... Lampkin Lane has a lot of moderately strong pallets in the middle of the streets and by the houses, because those merely create openings for either side, rather than actually adding a lot of mandatory chase time to every chase mostly independent of killer skill based on relatively trivial survivor execution, which is a super negative quality of the map.

    What strong linked chains effectively do is increase the time investment to get a CHANCE at a hit. So if you run the strong full loop at Lampkin you are maybe spending 50 seconds to try to get one hit in (Unless the survivor makes a serious execution error) before they permanently expend a strong resource. Meanwhile at say... new auto haven... that is down to like 20 seconds. So it doesn't matter that new auto haven has a lot of strong pallets, it isn't literally twice as much, and it also is forcing the survivor to make these plays more frequently which means they are more likely to make a mistake or make a deadzone. It also rewards the survivor more for running a loop well, because any himbo, bimbo, or thembo can eat up 30 seconds on a T-L wall, but it takes a really good survivor who is making good calls on the killer to eat up a minute (or a really predictable killer), or to run a mid tier pallet 3 loops instead of just 2. This matters more when getting an extra 20 seconds out of a chase is a near 100% improvement on that loop, rather than only a 60% improvement

  • Jb94
    Jb94 Member Posts: 209
    Options

    This was a really good explanation all round- thank you!

  • lagosta
    lagosta Member Posts: 1,869
    Options

    My only objection regarding maps is the inconsistency on placement of areas where you can trigger Balanced Landing. We don't need a whole Hill spawn, but some small assets where you can climb and fall could be enough. The climbable rocks in Yamaoka, for example, were a bit of fresh air. Some maps like Shelter Woods, on the other hand, have absolutely nothing besides the fall into the basement stairs.