Are you satisfied with the new MMR?
![[Deleted User]](https://forums.bhvr.com/applications/dashboard/design/images/defaulticon.png)
Comments
-
No
It could use some tweaks. Sometimes i have fun matches because of MMR, sometimes i have awful matches because of MMR. The issue is that i don't really have much control over it, and BHVR is not at all transparent on what it measures and how it functions. It just gives me a bad feeling in my stomach since i feel very powerless when attempting to enjoy my matches.
2 -
No
As a survivor i get the worst teammates imaginable and as a killer i only get (toxic) SWF's with OP items and perks.
1 -
I'm unsure for now. My experience with MMR thus far has just been kind of... meh?
0 -
Yes
MMR is good after some trials (like 20). Then you got fair games.
It's not perfect though but it will improve over time.
0 -
Today was better than yesterday. Didn't play much killer, but on survivor side I am starting to get some really nice teammates. Had exciting and tough last game against blight and everyone tried their best.
Hope it stays close to that. But it is dbd you never know. Sometimes it gets random.
0 -
Yes
Killer games feel about the same as they used to, except for survivor where my games I die much more often.
0 -
No
Survivor feels a lot harder to play now because of really bad teamates. Only part I love is the fact that my killer games seem fair now and I am not stomping low skilled survivors anymore.
0 -
Yes
Feels great on killer, although kinda inconsistent on survivor.
0 -
Yes
I have been getting great Killer match ups, One of the first times I actually Enjoyed a Match playing Bubba.
other killers are terrible tho, matchmaking gives me super survivors and playing is a pain.
Survivor. im matched with alot of potato heads. but pretty potato head too sometimes soo I guess its proper.
0 -
Yes
My matchmaking is usually fair
0 -
No
Revert back to the old matchmaking and i'll be happy :)
0 -
No
it feels like a sidegrade or a mild downgrade. It has most of the same issues as the one, mainly that it's still largely ineffectual at determining skill and from my experience makes for a less enjoyable experience with the one caveat of being less killer dependant, aka not punishing or rewarding certain killers unfairly like the old system use to do.
0 -
No
No.
As survivor I don't find better teammates, and I had better ones with ranks.
As killer I don't get better survivors after many and many matches where I win.
You don't get rewarded as survivor for having very long chases, and as killer if I play Leatherface with Deadlock, Corrupt and Noed and I facecamp the whole game and I get a tie (2k) or I win (3k) the game considers it the same as someone who got 10 hook states and 2 kills, or 11 hook states and 3 kills.
No encouragement to go for multiple chases, just camping and tunneling all day.
0 -
No
The MMR calculation system needs to be reworked. I think that looping length and length of match should be the main drivers for calculating MMR. If the match is over quickly then MMR should not change very much and if it takes longer then that means the skill level between survivor and killer is more balanced and MMR should go up or down depending on kill/escape. The reason I think that this system works is it will force the game to put you against people who are not newbies but also not crazy good/toxic (hopefully). Only reason I want this is because my killer matches have gotten tougher and some of them ridiculously tough to point where I don't have a fair chance to win the game. Just because you get a 4k or escape does not mean that you are good at the game and played well. The survivors might not be good or you got lucky. The MMR does not account for that. I also think that the number of hooks and when your kills occur should be a factor for MMR. Basically if they change the MMR to have conditions (weights) for kills and escapes then I think the system will be more fair.
0
