Bhvr, why don’t you try 3vs1 and 5vs1?
3 survs and 4 gens and 5 survs and 6 gens. This way if the waiting time for survs/killer is high you can start automatically a 3vs1 or 5vs1 match
Comments
-
The game used to have 3v1 with 4 gens when a survivor disconnected during the loading screen. It was awful, an insanely easy win for most killers. So, I dunno about 5v1, but I definitely don't want to go back to the days of 3v1 matches.
7 -
Ever had a DC or suicide on first down and 4 gens left? You will know that the game then heavily tilts towards the killer end.
Having a measly 1 extra gen for a full survivor would have the same effect but reverse, heavily tilting it to the survivors.
1 -
The game becomes extremely easy for Killers to control the match if there's only 3 survivors. Hence people are tunneling to get one survivor or out its because it suddenly feels like a huge load off your shoulders and now you're confident you can mess about. That's how delicate the balance is in this game. Game is survivor sided but when one disappear it tilts immediately to the other side
0 -
For custom games sure. We can already do 3v1 that way, and the addition of 5v1 would be cool (though may come with performance issues.
But these two wouldn't be very balanced, hence why they should remain custom game modes.
0 -
Both of these are terrible.
0 -
Id rather eat nails than play a 5v1
0 -
5v1 would be even worse for Killer than a 4v1 and 3v1 would be a pain for the Survivors, not great ideas
0 -
for killer easy to hard : 4/5/6 surv
for survivor easy to hard : 6/5/4 surv
would be very awesome of course more gens and killers buffs
0 -
If there are 3 survivors it is extremely easy to win as killer. If there are 5 survivors it is extremely easy to win as survivor.
0 -
Yeah no that's not how the game works buddy. It becomes increasingly easy to juggle three players instead of four.
0 -
How about 10 survivors, but they only have 1 hook state
0
