Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.
Access the survey HERE!
Why do we have an issue with NFTs again? (answered)
Answers
-
People have become puritans. They must not associate with anyone marked with the scarlet letter.
Don't like NFTs? Don't buy them. Playing DbD or buying Pinhead has no connection to that. It does nothing but make people feel righteous with minimal effort spent.
0 -
Thank you.
0 -
Not really.
0 -
It is.
"Concern" is listed as a synonym of "Issue." Therefore, to voice a concern is the same as to voice an issue.
0 -
But you do articulate yourself and argue really well. You make some valid points.
0 -
I was interpreting it differently
Post edited by DangerScouse on0 -
Well, then you interpreted it incorrectly. The people in this thread have been demonstrating their issues and voicing their concerns.
0 -
Post edited by DangerScouse on0
-
Unless you can prove that the people in this thread have been faking it, it doesn't matter if you believe them or not.
0 -
I can believe they are without proof.
0 -
You're allowed to do that, but it doesn't matter whether you do or not. The fact that they have made those issues and concerns known actively demonstrates your original claim wrong.
0 -
Post edited by DangerScouse on0
-
I am aware, and that belief is demonstrated to be wrong based on the comments in this thread showing people having an issue.
0 -
.
Post edited by DangerScouse on0 -
Correct, but you have not and cannot prove that to be the case.
0 -
Confirmation Bias and/or ignoring evidence seems to be their problem.
0 -
True. But I'm allowed to have an opinion. And I'm allowed to state my opinions in a respecful way. I'd love to be proved wrong.
0 -
An incorrect statement is not the same as an opinion. An opinion is subjective; your original statement is either objectively correct or objectively incorrect. More specifically, it is an incorrect statement based on the comments in this thread actively contradicting that statement.
0 -
You assumed my original statement wasn't an opinion. I apologise if that wasn't clear. I was stating my belief. Based on what I have seen. But an opinion nevertheless
0 -
No, it is not an opinion. There's no subjectivity to whether or not people in this thread have issue. That fact is either true or false. Ergo, your initial statement is a factual claim. A factually incorrect one, but a factual one nonetheless.
0 -
It was an opinion.
0 -
There is no subjectivity in that statement, so it cannot be an opinion since subjectivity is fundamental to an opinion. The statement is either true or false, which is antithetical to what an opinion is.
0 -
Yes there was.
0 -
Incorrect. Either people do have issue with NFTs in this thread, or they do not. It is not possible for both to be true. Ergo, there can't be subjectivity, rendering the statement unable to be considered an opinion.
0 -
I am allowed to believe they don't, and I'm allowed to believe that if they claim to then I don't believe them. Maybe I should have prefaced my original post with "It is my opinion that...."
But I won't allow you to bully me out of my opinion.
0 -
I never said you were not allowed to have that belief. In fact, I have actively stated multiple times that you are allowed to have that belief. But the belief is incorrect and has been demonstrated to be incorrect by the comments in this thread. But you are allowed to still have that belief despite that.
0 -
You can't prove my belief is incorrect
0 -
I already have by showing you that there are comments in this thread showing that they have issues with NFTs, which runs directly contradictory to your original claim that we don't have issues with NFTs.
0 -
He's dying on the most amusing hill right now
1 -
My point is I don't believe people on here are being entirely genuine, and that their outrage at NFTs is false.
0 -
As stated before, it doesn't matter if you believe them or not. If you believe them to be false, then it is on you to prove that their outrage is indeed false. You have no obligation to do so, but until you do, your original statement is incorrect.
0 -
I believe my opinion to be correct.
0 -
An opinion is subjective and cannot be correct or incorrect. You are actively contradicting yourself.
0 -
I like you 😂😂😂
0 -
Regardless, the original statement you have made regarding issues about NFTs is incorrect.
0 -
Next time I'm in an argument, may I have permission to have you on my side. You are good. 😁
0 -
Look, are we finished here?
0 -
Idk what's more circular, this argument or the Ontological argument
0 -
I conceed that I should have been clearer in my original statement, that what I said was my opinion and not facts. I apologise. It was not factually correct. Just my belief.
Can we be friends 😁. Good debate. Thank you. And thank you for Disagreeing but not being insulting.
0 -
Your original statement is not an opinion; just wrong. An example of an opinion would be "NFTs are fine, and people who have issues with them are misguided." If you want to use that as what you originally meant, that's fine.
0 -
The planet would be a better place if people genuinely cared that much, so when I perceice outrage to be false, when it would have cause to be genuine, it upsets me.
Post edited by DangerScouse on0 -
I have conceded to end a silly argument to a very good debater. Should have phrased my original statement better.
Post edited by DangerScouse on0
