http://dbd.game/killswitch
Request: I would like the "Unique Wedding Ring"( add on) to gain priority in voiding the obsession
Since the key was nerfed I started using its addons to create builds, the problem is that the "Unique Wedding Ring" addon doesn't always prevent me from being the obsession, especially if I'm using obsession perks, my idea was that when i use this addon i don't become the obsession unless there are other players using the perk too, thanks for your attention and feedbacks
Comments
-
If you use an obsession perk that increases your chances then it will cancel out the decreased chance the ring provides; eg. you’ll have the same odds of being the obsession as you would if you hadn’t brought either of the two.
If you don’t use any other obsession perk with the ring, then you’ll never be the initial obsession unless every other survivor also has something that decreases their chances.
0 -
I know that, but I wanted her to nullify the obsession even with obsession perks, sometimes I want to build a build that I can't be the obsession and I need to wait for a game that I'm not the obsession, then it consumes me a lot of time .
0 -
“Using this add-on will guarantee that you do not begin the trial as the obsession.”
I don’t think that’s too much to ask, considering it’s very rare and literally the only way the add-on has any value.
1 -
Dunno, being obsession only does good for most of times anyway.
0 -
yeah dont perks that involve obsession reward you for NOT hooking/hitting the obsession?
0 -
There are still two that never got changed.. Remember Me. Also, Furtive Chase only works if the obsession gets hooked and unhooked. But no one uses those perks really.
0 -
Furtive chase the best obsession perk
0 -
yes, it's a very situational add on, it's more to play with it, it's far from being something people keep using to win games
0 -
Can you give an example? Like you want to play Object of Obsession without being the obsession?
0 -
There’s also Decisive Strike, Mettle of Man, and Sole Survivor that all increase your odds of being the obsession. You obviously would want to be the obsession if running OoO.
0 -
Not really, if you want to figure out what aura perks the killer have, it can be useful not being the obsession. I don't see other reason for someone not wanting to be the obsession - except the perks you mentioned in the previous comment, but like you said, nobody runs those.
0 -
Object will still go off for killer aura reading perks, whether or not you are the obsession. You just have to pay extra attention when the 30-second timer is about to go off.
0 -
then why?
0 -
I might be confused. With this add-on, you don’t want to be the obsession; but with Object of Obsession, you do. That’s the only perk it really matters, aside from the BP gained after escaping or dying as the obsession. The OP wants to run unspecified obsession perks without being the obsession, due to this add-on.
That’s all I was getting at.
0 -
yes, I think of several ideas, I'll give an example, but there are others, if I want to use a Ds or MoM, and I want to use this add on to see the aura of obsession (which is the add on function) I could no longer because it would increase my chances of being the obsession, I have a thought that says: when I put a perk or add on in my build, the least I hope is that it works, I know that many times this is not possible, but in that case it would be up to the devs to adjust it wouldn't cause problems
0 -
I have several ideas, one of them was to activate the mettle of man using the object of obsession, the problem is that I couldn't be seen by the killer otherwise he would focus on me, but sometimes it takes time to find a match that I'm not the obsession
0 -
There is Blood Pact too, but this one already guarantees you don't start as the obsession. Perhaps he is just afraid of being moried by Rancor or tunneled because of Remember Me lol.
1 -
Oh I see... maybe you can try it with the addon plus For The People and Blood Pact, that should reduce the odds enough, unless you need DH or something. But I see the point of your suggestion now.
0
