We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

Idk why the finisher mori is an issue??

Nathan13
Nathan13 Member Posts: 6,721
edited August 2022 in General Discussions

I understand some players are complaining that if you’re the last survivor alive and you get downed, you won’t be able to use DS, power struggle and flip flop.

But it’s not like that happens often anyway and you know you’re most likely dead at that point. I don’t see why it’s a problem.

Post edited by EQWashu on
«1

Comments

  • Nathan13
    Nathan13 Member Posts: 6,721
  • Nathan13
    Nathan13 Member Posts: 6,721

    Well it won’t be here until the fall so maybe the devs will implement an option to carry the survivor to a hook or hatch.

  • TotemSeeker91
    TotemSeeker91 Member Posts: 2,358

    Well, for adept you would hope they would realize that and give you merciless anyways

  • deKlaw_04
    deKlaw_04 Member Posts: 3,660
  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989

    People saying "because I want to carry someone or give them a hatch" is what is wrong with the player base.

    It's not "Kumbaya By Daylight" people!! You wanna give people nice escapes. Go play "Care Bear Simulator". Honestly!!

  • Belzher
    Belzher Member Posts: 469

    I think the only problem is being automatic, it would be good to give us the choice of moring for free or hooking them.

  • Tsulan
    Tsulan Member Posts: 15,095

    How often do we see Cypress Moris these days? No one uses them, because they´re worthless.

    Same goes for the new mechanic. Even when it will be basekit, we´ll barely see the mori sequence.

  • Mister_xD
    Mister_xD Member Posts: 7,669

    The only critisism on it I can understand is when people say they want it to be a choice - but then I also understand the flip side of that coin, where making it a choice would enable the Killer to bleed out the Survivor out of spite, which would go entirely against the idea of this mechanic saving everyone some time.


    But yeah, anyone complaining that it "robs them off potential escape attempts" has some strong Copium.

  • Mr_K
    Mr_K Member Posts: 9,245
  • Nun_So_Vile
    Nun_So_Vile Member Posts: 2,437
    edited May 2022

    Because for the last 6 years almost everyone has been up in arms about how "free" things given to either side are not a viable solution. I don't care if it's the last survivor and it's their last hook, there should still be player agency even in situations that might seem unwinnable. Doesn't matter if it's a killer wanting to carry for the hatch, a small chance that the killer can't make it to the hook because a hook is gone, if it's a DS proc, Using Unbreakable because the Killer doesn't wanna pick you up for some reason, or whatever the situation could be.

    Honestly, those are the most memorable and intense chase moments, especially when you have your squad in the background hyping you tf up during those moments. It gives you all something collectively to cheer for and share a moment, and if you pull off the 1v1 escape its only the cherry on top. Now killers can just be given the last kill for free on down...no more quality interactions like that which many people enjoy. That is very important because this game has recently had a lot of things that are not so enjoyable and now we are just supposed to be fine that they get rid of more things people like? What's to like about that?

    Post edited by Nun_So_Vile on
  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989

    Which is your choice. I disagree with you doing that, but your game and your choice.

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989

    Because you can be kind and show sportsmanship without giving someonethe hatch. And the problem is that people doing this a) creates expectations and fuels survivor entitlement, and b) is kind of condescending and disrespectful. Actually rather unsportsmanlike.

  • ColonGlock
    ColonGlock Member Posts: 1,224

    Faster games will benefit us all. I hope they also make the end game collapse automatically when the last gen is completed.

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989

    If he did well you wouldn't need to "wipe his backside" or hand feed him his "Farleys Rusks". Do what you will, by all means, but I have issues with this, as apparently the only way to "be nice and respectful". Hogwash.

  • foxsansbox
    foxsansbox Member Posts: 2,209

    The issue can be easily fixed.

    Killer downs last survivor.

    Prompt comes up with a 10 second delay: Mori or release?

    You pick, event happens, everyone happy, yes?

  • Zeidoktor
    Zeidoktor Member Posts: 2,065

    Re: Giving last survivor the Hatch

    The simplest thing to do there would, to me, just be don't down them and let them find it. Or close hatch and give them gate.

    Though I do wonder what happens when the survivor is downed separately from the Killer (nemesis zombie, honing stoned bear trap, failure to mend, etc)

  • Cybil
    Cybil Member Posts: 1,163
    edited May 2022

    This new mechanic is great for the games health. Killers can no longer bleed out survivors out of spite and it gives the match a much more satisfying ending. Gone are the days where killers are afraid to pick up the last survivor as well. If anyone wants to give hatch then either the killer can refrain from downing them or the survivor can jump into a locker.

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989

    Nah. I just choose to pkay the game as intended, and show respect by not showing pity. Also, sound slide you probably give money to charity... then tell everyone you have given to charity 😂😂

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989
    edited May 2022

    Also, I never claimed to speak for the average player. I was giving my opinion. I said as much.

    I dislike that now everyone shouts and "boasts" about giving the hatch out of pity, that everyone else is expected to. Or at least you are "not a nice person" if you chose not to. That is why I have an issue with it. The bragging and the expectation it sets. On the flip side I don't expect survivors to hand me a kill if they stomp on me (which happens a lot lol). I don't thank someone for showing me pity. Want to be nice to me... play the game as intended, within the rules, respectfully and fairly......and what will be will be. That's respect for your opponent! Or if you must.... give the hatch without feeling the need to broadcast it.

    That is my opinion.

  • lauraa
    lauraa Member Posts: 3,195

    Not being able to hook the last survivor after a done match on Midwich or something is kinda annoying.

    If you REALLY wanna spare someone, cant you just not down them?

  • Deathstroke
    Deathstroke Member Posts: 3,522

    That's not the problem. Problem is that as killer I can't let last survivor escape and carry her to hatch or exit gate. It just make it very hard to show that you let them escape and show some friendliness.

  • Deathstroke
    Deathstroke Member Posts: 3,522

    Well other way is just to farm with them and let them escape then I quess?

  • ohheyitsbobcat
    ohheyitsbobcat Member Posts: 1,760

    I get some people not wanting it to be automatic because of some niche situations to which I can empathize and potentially agree but I don't get the hatch complaint. I give people hatch all the time, almost every game I win in and in the new system you can just not down them if that's what you want. If you want someone to have hatch then just give them the hatch or close it and let them have the door instead.

    Wanting to down them first to show you're on top before giving them a pity/mercy escape just for the sense of superiority and dominance is being a smug af winner. I have no problem with that being removed.

  • BassGuitarRox
    BassGuitarRox Member Posts: 57

    I too worry about not having the option to give the hatch to the last survivor. I don’t always do it if I’m being honest, but I’d still like the option available when necessary.

    I do understand the reasoning behind having the last survivor be instantly moried - I guess it should slightly speed up the process of the end game, and should give a satisfying conclusion.

    I was thinking there could be a way around this - perhaps when the last survivor is downed, there is an on screen prompt for ‘mercy’ or ‘Mori’. If the killer chooses the former, they are automatically picked up and auto-guided to the hatch somehow with no interaction. If they choose the latter, they get moried and the match ends - thoughts?

    I’ve lost track of how many times I’ve accidentally drawn out the game because I’ve taken forever to find the hatch to give to the survivor haha 🤣

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989
    edited May 2022

    Then people shouldn't expect everyone to do the same. Or assume that if you don't do it then somehow you are not showing empathy or respect. That's my issue.

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989

    I think it best we choose to end this debate and agree we both have a different perspective on this ok.

  • dugman
    dugman Member Posts: 9,713

    Nothing about this new change prevents you from letting the last survivor go out the hatch. Just don't down them first.

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989
    edited May 2022

    No. Play the game as intended. Don't cheat and make sure you play fair. That is how you show respect to your opponent. This whole hatch debate seems to forget that. To assume you have to go out of your way to "be nice", or the implication that acts such as this is the only way to be nice is wrong. You get the 4k, fair play. You get 0k, fair play. Respect and move on.

  • dugman
    dugman Member Posts: 9,713

    To respond to various comments here:

    • Nothing in this change prevents you from letting the last person out the hatch. Just don't down them and BOOM they can use the hatch, done!
    • I agree that the last person downed should count as a hook for purposes of missions and things like BBQ and Chili and pips, etc. That can hypothetically be done in the automated system just fine though.


  • Deathstroke
    Deathstroke Member Posts: 3,522

    Well I want to win so I can't play fair always. I have lost easy 4K:s sometimes because I wanted to hook everyone twice before killing anyone. So sometimes you just have to be evil and cheat.

  • DangerScouse
    DangerScouse Member Posts: 989

    Nah. Respectfully disagree. And again this is what I perceive to be a problem with the community entitlement. You shouldn't have to hook everyone twice before a kill to "play fair". And not doing so is not being evil or cheating.

  • Norhc
    Norhc Member Posts: 575

    They should have made the iridescent mori basekit and something that you have to earn through the match rather than just forcing the yellow one.

  • steezo_de
    steezo_de Member Posts: 1,213

    As survivor, I'm fine with the change since it gets me out of the game faster and onto another. The times I wiggle out and get hatch is so rare, it's better this way, overall, for me.

    As killer, the only issue I really have is that I might have to play an extra game to finish a tome challenge.

  • WaveyTrey
    WaveyTrey Member Posts: 652

    This stops survivors from crawling to a quiet corner of HECK until they fully bleed out. This robbed killers of their Mori’s, specifically the Yellow Mori, in the first place.

    Survivors simply have to be standing up if they want the hatch. They can’t be lying down. Killers can have them wiggle free, and survivors must expend their Unbreakable before the animation gets them.

    This buffs Rancor really well too. Just make sure 2 survivors are alive when all the gens are done. You will get 2 Mori’s if you play your cards right. The obsession, and the last survivor.

  • Maelstrom808
    Maelstrom808 Member Posts: 685

    "Just don't down them."

    I like to play the match to a conclusion. To me, that means either I down the last survivor or they escape. Once I've downed them, I'd still like the opportunity to choose to give them hatch or the gate (as I do in probably half or so of my wins).

    If the issue is bleeding out survivors, just add an interaction where you can hold down space or something similar, to massively speed up the bleed out timer.

    I really like the Mori or Mercy idea, except I'd have Mercy just spawn a hatch within a few meters of the survivor and disable the Killer's pick-up ability. It's quick and easy and allows both types of play while eliminating toxic endgame shenanigans.

This discussion has been closed.