Lobby selection is not fair
I played about 100 killer matches and 100 survivor matches. I see that if the killer loses, they often give him less survivors in terms of skill. I see that if a survivor dies in all matches, then they won't give him a weaker killer. Why is the killer a priority in the selection?
Comments
-
Survivor games relied on team mate alot, the more you die, the less experience team mates you have, and you die more
You also get less experience killers, but in low MMR, killers dominate survivors.
1 -
I noticed that the killers are still the same skilled. They have 1500 hours or more. Rather, he lost several matches to the SWF, and they gave him the surviving potatoes. I never see potato killers.
1 -
For me its pretty whiplash. Actually, No. Straight UP whiplash. One game its MEGA SWEAT 5000 BUY THIS MF A SHOWER, next game is a baby killer and I feel obligated to give them a kill if I complete my challenge.
MMR Is still broken. My first killer game in 10 months was against a Sweat with Friends and it was ugly.. After playing for a month though? Still no noticeable change. there's no middle of the road. Its a bad Rollercoaster Tycoon design for both roles.
0 -
There are more good killers, because good players choose to play killer more often and bad players choose to play survivor more often.
0 -
I can play this game for five hours and escape one or twice. Most of the time theres not even ONE game where all four survivors make it out. Solo queue is a nightmare. I'd literally be winning more in a BR than I do in this game. Genuinely awful.
2 -
Wait... what? 5 hours and only 2 escapes?
This greatly varies from my experience. Like holy cow...
0 -
I have so
0
