A Wraith body blocked me in the basement is that bannable?
So I was playing a match on Father Campbell's Chapel, I was playing against a Wraith who hooked a Claudette in the basement, I went down there and saved her, as we went up the stairs we couldn't go past Midway up. We came to the conclusion that the killer was invisible and was blocking us from leaving.
About 8 minutes later, the exit gates are powered and he uncloaks and uses no one escapes death on me as the Claudette runs away, he hooks me and keeps hitting me until I die, after the game ended, he texted me saying that he can't get banned because he didn't prolong the game.
I reported him for game play abuse, but I want to know if what he did is bannable or not, if it's not then that pisses me off, remember that this was on console, so I'm not sure if the banning system is the same as PC. I would really like this discussion to be noticed
Comments
-
That's a pretty dick move, but I do not believe it is bannable since he technically didn't prolong the game and the other survivors could progress generators.
People play like that and people wonder why this player base is so salty all the time.
4 -
@Attackfrog said:
That's a pretty dick move, but I do not believe it is bannable since he technically didn't prolong the game and the other survivors could progress generators.People play like that and people wonder why this player base is so salty all the time.
If that's true, then that kinda pisses me off, some people ruin games and think it's hilarious. What a let down
1 -
@JoyfulLeader said:
@Attackfrog said:
That's a pretty dick move, but I do not believe it is bannable since he technically didn't prolong the game and the other survivors could progress generators.People play like that and people wonder why this player base is so salty all the time.
If that's true, then that kinda pisses me off, some people ruin games and think it's hilarious. What a let down
Yeah it's a pretty ######### way to play and in the end he only got the 1k, so I would consider it a survivor win, but it sucks for the person being body blocked (you).
Even if he would have camped you right away you could have gotten into another match and been playing again.
It's a dick move.
1 -
Yeah I dont think its bannable since he actually killed you and didnt just wait there until you disconnected. Yeah it's quite a cheap move but I dont think its bannable.1
-
I dunno OP is it bannable for Survivors to body block a hook?
7 -
I dunno was that even part of the discussion?Vortexas said:I dunno OP is it bannable for Survivors to body block a hook?
1 -
Pretty much.Vortexas said:I dunno OP is it bannable for Survivors to body block a hook?
I've bodyblocked the basement before when I have toxic teabaggers on the hook so nobody can get down to unhook, but I wouldn't bodyblock anyone down there who wasn't hooked not even if it was NOED.
Doesn't sound like a bannable thing though. It's scummy but its also "a LeGiT StrAtEgY".0 -
It's not. Ban's don't apply to console, unless psn mods decide to ban you for something you say to the person
0 -
@Vortexas said:
I dunno OP is it bannable for Survivors to body block a hook?The fact that people can't see the difference between body blocking a killer and body blocking a survivor.
A survivor takes damage, a killer does not.
You take a risk to body block as a survivor you take no risk body blocking as a killer.
I swear some of you don't actually play this game.
8 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@Vortexas said:
I dunno OP is it bannable for Survivors to body block a hook?The fact that people can't see the difference between body blocking a killer and body blocking a survivor.
A survivor takes damage, a killer does not.
You take a risk to body block as a survivor you take no risk body blocking as a killer.
I swear some of you don't actually play this game.
The risk is that you lose the other Survivors and essentially lose the match. But that's not the point, the point is that you put the other person into a situation where they are completely at your mercy and you can simply walk away from the computer and turn on Netflix to force a DC.
Trapping someone in the basement for any longer than like, 30 seconds should be bannable. No one should have to put up with that bullshit. This could easily be fixed by making the Killer passable after about 15 seconds of idling. This wouldn't affect Insidious either, as you should be hidden when using it anyway, not blocking someone's path, and this would still allow the Killer to bodyblock doorways in chases.
0 -
If such minor annoyance (that was kinda on you since no one forced you to go to the basement, you could have left her to die there) gets to you then hope you won't meet Punisher Freddy build.
It uses PWYF and rancor to stalk obsession whole game and them mori them at the end without going for anyone else. I had one game like that against me so I decided to try that build myself and I'm having so much fun with it.(Especially after heavy DS games with 4 people running it)Don't make such a big deal of dyiing. If he kept you there for ever only to grief you then I'd undertand you but he did not.
0 -
This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
3 -
@Vortexas said:
I dunno OP is it bannable for Survivors to body block a hook?Oh my god you're so stupid with your responses sometimes. Normally you're giving valid points but this is stupid. Bodyblocking a hook does not make the killer do nothing for 8 minutes just shut up. Give a proper response rather then making such irrelevant infuriating responses like that.
I'm starting to feel like you're a rank 20 killer main who gets bullied. First you said you'd facecamp any claudette (toxic or not) and now you're bringing such a dumb point into this post.
3 -
@weirdkid5 said:
This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
My thoughts exactly.
Also, OP waited for quite a long time. 8 minutes is another game and tbh I can't know whether he is waiting for his NOED or taking the game hostage. I would DC after 1 or 2 minute.
People understand the evil intention here but they try to defend their side at whatever cost. Truly saddening.
1 -
@Delfador said:
@weirdkid5 said:
This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
My thoughts exactly.
Also, OP waited for quite a long time. 8 minutes is another game and tbh I can't know whether he is waiting for his NOED or taking the game hostage. I would DC after 1 or 2 minute.
People understand the evil intention here but they try to defend their side at whatever cost. Truly saddening.
I didn't want to DC in case I would become banned.
0 -
He wasn't holding the game hostage, technically, but hitting you on the hook and his response in the post-game chat make it sound like he was looking for a loophole to grief you. If it's not bannable, it should be.
7 -
@Orion said:
He wasn't holding the game hostage, technically, but hitting you on the hook and his response in the post-game chat make it sound like he was looking for a loophole to grief you. If it's not bannable, it should be.I think he just wanted to be a scumbag, I'm surprised that this post is getting a decent amount of attention, which makes me glad
1 -
@JoyfulLeader said:
@Orion said:
He wasn't holding the game hostage, technically, but hitting you on the hook and his response in the post-game chat make it sound like he was looking for a loophole to grief you. If it's not bannable, it should be.I think he just wanted to be a scumbag, I'm surprised that this post is getting a decent amount of attention, which makes me glad
Indeed, and scumbags should be banned.
Toxicity usually gets some degree of attention, for better or for worse.3 -
Yeah i had a wraith who hooked my friend in the basement once, then he just stood on the bottom of the stairs, letting no one through. When my friend died we almost got all gens and then he caught me and camped my hook. I reported him for unsportsmanlike behaviour but i don't believe that they really ban people on console.JoyfulLeader said:So I was playing a match on Father Campbell's Chapel, I was playing against a Wraith who hooked a Claudette in the basement, I went down there and saved her, as we went up the stairs we couldn't go past Midway up. We came to the conclusion that the killer was invisible and was blocking us from leaving.
About 8 minutes later, the exit gates are powered and he uncloaks and uses no one escapes death on me as the Claudette runs away, he hooks me and keeps hitting me until I die, after the game ended, he texted me saying that he can't get banned because he didn't prolong the game.
I reported him for game play abuse, but I want to know if what he did is bannable or not, if it's not then that pisses me off, remember that this was on console, so I'm not sure if the banning system is the same as PC. I would really like this discussion to be noticed
0 -
Pretty dickish, yeah.
Not bannable though, it's pretty much a slower version of a Pig holding an RBT Survivor downstairs.0 -
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
0 -
@weirdkid5 said:
This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
The killer could have gotten more kills by hooking the guy, camping the hook and using his noed on another survivor and then camping that hook. Easy 2k, instead of the 1k he got.
While he bodyblocked the basement, the survivors had free reign of of the map. It's in the same vein as camping a hook, only WAAAAY less efficient. Camping a hook at least makes sense because you are getting your kill while taking a survivor out of the match...plus it's only 2 mins.
Bodyblocking in this way is not a good strategy unless you are solely trying to frustrate that survivor. And if the survivor wasn't taunting the killer, then it is truly a dick move.
But we also don't know what happened pre-bodyblock! Maybe this survivor was teabagging and taunting...in which case, the in-game response makes sense.
0 -
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.The_Crusader said:
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.4 -
Yea being a good team mate and trying to save someone means you should be stuck in the basement for 8 minutes.Kebek said:If such minor annoyance (that was kinda on you since no one forced you to go to the basement, you could have left her to die there) gets to you then hope you won't meet Punisher Freddy build.
It uses PWYF and rancor to stalk obsession whole game and them mori them at the end without going for anyone else. I had one game like that against me so I decided to try that build myself and I'm having so much fun with it.(Especially after heavy DS games with 4 people running it)Don't make such a big deal of dyiing. If he kept you there for ever only to grief you then I'd undertand you but he did not.
4 -
Well like I said I wouldn't go this far.SenzuDuck said:
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.The_Crusader said:
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
I have bodyblocked the basement before but only when the person or peoples in the basement were on hooks. They were toxic so wanted them out of the game. I consider that fair.
I wouldn't bodyblock an unhooked person. Seems pointless. I can see your point about how elwere they to know the killer was waiting for NOED.
0 -
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
1 -
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
And? 8 minutes to body block someone in the basement is not the same as taking a hit, you guys call me biased but when it comes to something like this you'll defend it to the moon and back it's so sad.
2 -
First off, yea. You’re biased. Second, he was just saying killer also risks crap when they blockSenzuDuck said:@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
And? 8 minutes to body block someone in the basement is not the same as taking a hit, you guys call me biased but when it comes to something like this you'll defend it to the moon and back it's so sad.
1 -
@KiraElijah said:
First off, yea. You’re biased. Second, he was just saying killer also risks crap when they blockBlocking for an entire 8 minutes is on the killer, there is no excuse for that, no reason to do, at that point you're making the choice to lose, you're not playing properly, he COULD have played the game properly and gained more points but HE decided not too, that's not an excuse or a reason to body block.
Find one actual biased comment I've ever made and I'll accept it, until then stop making up lies, you don't know what biased means.
2 -
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.
It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
1 -
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
How are you guys so blind to bad killer tactics?
A survivor can't do anything to a body blocking killer, a killer can force survivors out of the gate. You guys really do only see one side it's ridiculous.
2 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
And? 8 minutes to body block someone in the basement is not the same as taking a hit, you guys call me biased but when it comes to something like this you'll defend it to the moon and back it's so sad.
I dare to say that 8 minutes bodyblockign someone is more risky than taking a single hit if we are talking about losing the game
0 -
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
And? 8 minutes to body block someone in the basement is not the same as taking a hit, you guys call me biased but when it comes to something like this you'll defend it to the moon and back it's so sad.
I dare to say that 8 minutes bodyblockign someone is more risky than taking a single hit if we are talking about losing the game
Ok, you're honestly just too biased to understand the difference.
2 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@KiraElijah said:
First off, yea. You’re biased. Second, he was just saying killer also risks crap when they blockBlocking for an entire 8 minutes is on the killer, there is no excuse for that, no reason to do, at that point you're making the choice to lose, you're not playing properly, he COULD have played the game properly and gained more points but HE decided not too, that's not an excuse or a reason to body block.
Find one actual biased comment I've ever made and I'll accept it, until then stop making up lies, you don't know what biased means.
Define playing properly please
0 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
And? 8 minutes to body block someone in the basement is not the same as taking a hit, you guys call me biased but when it comes to something like this you'll defend it to the moon and back it's so sad.
I dare to say that 8 minutes bodyblockign someone is more risky than taking a single hit if we are talking about losing the game
Ok, you're honestly just too biased to understand the difference.
Why dont you explain it to me then?
0 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
How are you guys so blind to bad killer tactics?
A survivor can't do anything to a body blocking killer, a killer can force survivors out of the gate. You guys really do only see one side it's ridiculous.
Because it's coming from you, Senzu.
You can't see anything except the bias up your own ass. So most of us have written you off as irrelevant a long ass time ago.
1 -
@FrenziedRoach said:
Because it's coming from you, Senzu.You can't see anything except the bias up your own ass. So most of us have written you off as irrelevant a long ass time ago.
OMEGALUL
You're just bad at the game like the rest of the killers here.
Honestly comparing an 8 minute body block to a 2 seconds body block and calling it the same. At that point the killer has chosen to not play the game, they've chosen to lose and there's nothing the survivor can do, they're locked out of the game.
But of course, body blocking the hook for 2 seconds absolutely locks the killer out of playing the game, right?
I keep asking people who call me biased to prove it with comments yet not a single person has ever linked me to an actual biased comment, and not something of me just disagreeing with someone, if I'm so biased, it shouldn't be hard to find a biased comment, I look forward to you also not proving I'm biased, because you wont reply with anything, good luck sweetheart.
I'm the biased one but ya'll trying to defend an 8 minute body block OMEGALUL
1 -
@Master said:
Why dont you explain it to me then?It's honestly hopeless.
If a killer is body blocking for 8 minutes THEYVE CHOSEN to lose, that is not an excuse that is not a "but it's worse for them" at that point they don't care how many points they get, they've done it to prevent someone playing the match because the can, not because it helps them in anyway.
Unbelievable how you people think this isn't the case, at the 2 minute mark the killer has chosen to lose and they don't care, they're doing it purely out of spite.
0 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
Why dont you explain it to me then?It's honestly hopeless.
If a killer is body blocking for 8 minutes THEYVE CHOSEN to lose, that is not an excuse that is not a "but it's worse for them" at that point they don't care how many points they get, they've done it to prevent someone playing the match because the can, not because it helps them in anyway.
Unbelievable how you people think this isn't the case, at the 2 minute mark the killer has chosen to lose and they don't care, they're doing it purely out of spite.
So you agree with me. 8 Minutes is a guaranteed lose while you can still win a game after taking a hit from teh killer.
Glad we agree
2 -
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
Why dont you explain it to me then?It's honestly hopeless.
If a killer is body blocking for 8 minutes THEYVE CHOSEN to lose, that is not an excuse that is not a "but it's worse for them" at that point they don't care how many points they get, they've done it to prevent someone playing the match because the can, not because it helps them in anyway.
Unbelievable how you people think this isn't the case, at the 2 minute mark the killer has chosen to lose and they don't care, they're doing it purely out of spite.
So you agree with me. 8 Minutes is a guaranteed lose while you can still win a game after taking a hit from teh killer.
Glad we agree
Yep, you're clueless.
1 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
Why dont you explain it to me then?It's honestly hopeless.
If a killer is body blocking for 8 minutes THEYVE CHOSEN to lose, that is not an excuse that is not a "but it's worse for them" at that point they don't care how many points they get, they've done it to prevent someone playing the match because the can, not because it helps them in anyway.
Unbelievable how you people think this isn't the case, at the 2 minute mark the killer has chosen to lose and they don't care, they're doing it purely out of spite.
So you agree with me. 8 Minutes is a guaranteed lose while you can still win a game after taking a hit from teh killer.
Glad we agree
Yep, you're clueless.
Always funny talking with you, its always absurd, do you sometimes look what you write?
2 -
@SenzuDuck i think he was semi joking when he made that. As a killer who does it is guarenteed a loss. But i do agree with you on the fact that body blocking isn't a proper playstyle for a killer(except when they litterally play themselves by putting themeselves in a corner l so you pin them to hit them once) but through awhole 8 mins just... Means you ether a troll or suck at huntingSenzuDuck said:@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
And? 8 minutes to body block someone in the basement is not the same as taking a hit, you guys call me biased but when it comes to something like this you'll defend it to the moon and back it's so sad.
I dare to say that 8 minutes bodyblockign someone is more risky than taking a single hit if we are talking about losing the game
Ok, you're honestly just too biased to understand the difference.
0 -
I do find it funny how no matter what the killer does there are calls for bans
But whenever survivors play toxic its somehow ok.
There really is an ochido/noob3 mentality whete the killer is there just to play fool while survivors run them around like idiots.0 -
Damn that wraith had some serious issues 😂JoyfulLeader said:About 8 minutes later, the exit gates are powered and he uncloaks and uses no one escapes death on me as the Claudette runs away, he hooks me and keeps hitting me until I die
2 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
How are you guys so blind to bad killer tactics?
A survivor can't do anything to a body blocking killer, a killer can force survivors out of the gate. You guys really do only see one side it's ridiculous.
Being a bad killer isn't bannable. Bodyblocking in this way is worse for both killer and the survivor than camping, but it didn't break the game, hack or prevent the survivors from progressing the game illegally.
I agree that the only benefit for the killer is frustrating the survivor that was blocked, but we don't know how much of a jerk the survivor may have been before hand (hell, i will waste a game and camp someone who taunts and teabags just for kicks).
And if he didn't taunt the killer....well....that's just a bad killer and if you just play a little later in the evening it will be past his bedtime and his mommy will have put him to bed.
0 -
@Dokta_Carter said:
SenzuDuck said:@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@Master said:
@SenzuDuck said:
The_Crusader said:
weirdkid5 said:
This idea that "because he eventually killed you" and "he didn't prolong the match" is exactly why we have little shits like that still running around in the game.
In any other game something like this would immediately be labeled as greifing, no matter how long the time (unless you're playing Rust, in which case you better be prepared to be someone's little prisoner)
In any other game, one team standing in the way to block the other from doing their objective would have been fixed a long, long time ago.
Bodyblocking shouldn't be in the game for anyone. But survivors wanted it as a tactic, so it's only fair that killers get to use it as a tactic too.
The bias is strong. I don’t get how people don’t see the difference between survivor body blocks and killer body blocks.
SURVIVORS TAKE DAMAGE
KILLERS DO NOT
you risk something to block as a survivor you risk nothing as a killer.
this guy waited 8 minutes, after 2/3 most players would assume a hostage game and DC.
A killer bodyblocking a guy in basement risks losing all map pressure and geting genrushed
And? 8 minutes to body block someone in the basement is not the same as taking a hit, you guys call me biased but when it comes to something like this you'll defend it to the moon and back it's so sad.
I dare to say that 8 minutes bodyblockign someone is more risky than taking a single hit if we are talking about losing the game
Ok, you're honestly just too biased to understand the difference.
@SenzuDuck i think he was semi joking when he made that. As a killer who does it is guarenteed a loss. But i do agree with you on the fact that body blocking isn't a proper playstyle for a killer(except when they litterally play themselves by putting themeselves in a corner l so you pin them to hit them once) but through awhole 8 mins just... Means you ether a troll or suck at hunting
They seriously don't get it I have no issue with body blocking but to defend 8 minutes of it, while the match still progresses the people that are locked out of the match can't do anything, that's absolutely ridiculous. I think that's unfair but apparently it makes me biased? these guys are high af.
0 -
@Attackfrog said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
How are you guys so blind to bad killer tactics?
A survivor can't do anything to a body blocking killer, a killer can force survivors out of the gate. You guys really do only see one side it's ridiculous.
Being a bad killer isn't bannable. Bodyblocking in this way is worse for both killer and the survivor than camping, but it didn't break the game, hack or prevent the survivors from progressing the game illegally.
I agree that the only benefit for the killer is frustrating the survivor that was blocked, but we don't know how much of a jerk the survivor may have been before hand (hell, i will waste a game and camp someone who taunts and teabags just for kicks).
And if he didn't taunt the killer....well....that's just a bad killer and if you just play a little later in the evening it will be past his bedtime and his mommy will have put him to bed.
I have no issue with body blocking at all*, but it completely prevents another player participating for no other reason than to be a nuisance, that should not be part of the game imo.
At least in the sense to wait out a game mechanic BT/Head Traps. But to do it for 8 minutes is absurd.
1 -
@SenzuDuck said:
@Attackfrog said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
How are you guys so blind to bad killer tactics?
A survivor can't do anything to a body blocking killer, a killer can force survivors out of the gate. You guys really do only see one side it's ridiculous.
Being a bad killer isn't bannable. Bodyblocking in this way is worse for both killer and the survivor than camping, but it didn't break the game, hack or prevent the survivors from progressing the game illegally.
I agree that the only benefit for the killer is frustrating the survivor that was blocked, but we don't know how much of a jerk the survivor may have been before hand (hell, i will waste a game and camp someone who taunts and teabags just for kicks).
And if he didn't taunt the killer....well....that's just a bad killer and if you just play a little later in the evening it will be past his bedtime and his mommy will have put him to bed.
I have no issue with body blocking at all, but it completely prevents another player participating for no other reason than to be a nuisance, that should not be part of the game imo.
I actually like body blocking...don't flame me. I find it useful as killer to block window leaps and sometimes pallets. This use of it is a bit ridiculous....but I even like that survivors can risk doing it too (as frustrating as it is!).
I think, overall, it adds more to the game than takes away. Just like booze....yeah it is terrible how some people abuse it, but do you really want to live WITHOUT it?
0 -
Not trying to disagree but... Unless all the survivors were noobiea shouldn't they have i dunno cleanse the totems? NOED should be assumed in most cases(because when you least expect it its there)SenzuDuck said:@Attackfrog said:
@SenzuDuck said:
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
@FrenziedRoach said:
Dick move, but fair play as far as the rules go.It's my understanding that as long as it's not a case where he afk's for 20 minutes and never comes back till you all disconnect, then it's bannable. But the fact that he was just using NOED in a rather simplistic but effective matter means he never intended to delay the game - only use his perk.
If that's bannable, then it's bannable for survivors to run around the map another 10 minutes in front of the exit instead of leaving.
Just saying.
How are you guys so blind to bad killer tactics?
A survivor can't do anything to a body blocking killer, a killer can force survivors out of the gate. You guys really do only see one side it's ridiculous.
Being a bad killer isn't bannable. Bodyblocking in this way is worse for both killer and the survivor than camping, but it didn't break the game, hack or prevent the survivors from progressing the game illegally.
I agree that the only benefit for the killer is frustrating the survivor that was blocked, but we don't know how much of a jerk the survivor may have been before hand (hell, i will waste a game and camp someone who taunts and teabags just for kicks).
And if he didn't taunt the killer....well....that's just a bad killer and if you just play a little later in the evening it will be past his bedtime and his mommy will have put him to bed.
I have no issue with body blocking at all, but it completely prevents another player participating for no other reason than to be a nuisance, that should not be part of the game imo.
0
