And until we fix this issue, we recommend that players with photosensitivity, or who have an epileptic condition or have had seizures of any kind consult their physician before playing.
Would you agree with this ranked system? (Killer side)
Scoring Points
Hooking a Survivor/Survivor reaching a new hook stage = +1 Point
Every Survivor was hooked once = +1 Point
No tunneling (No Survivor was hooked twice in row, excluding final survivor, including End Game!) = +1P
No Camping (Being within 20m of Hooked Survivor on the same floor for longer than 20 seconds, outside of chase, including End Game!) = +1P
End game = Once Exit Gates are powered (all Gens done)
Total maximum per match = 12 P+1P+1P+1P = 15 Points
Rating Performance per Points
S Rank = 15 to 14 points = Outstanding Performance
A Rank = 13 to 11 points = Amazing Performance
B Rank = 10 to 8 points = Good Performance
C Rank = 7 to 6 points = Avarage Performance
D Rank = 5 to 3 points = Weak Performance
F Rank = 2 to 0 points = Horrible Performance
Comments
-
Also I have idea if depending on which Killer you pick (strong having no extra and weak having +2) you would get extra points but these would not go beyond 15 points.
To incurage and not punish playing weaking killers.
0 -
i really liked it, the only problem with it is the ´´no camping´´ imo, because camping is in any way a problem (not even hard to counter)
0 -
I don’t know if it would work or not, but I’d be willing to test it. It’s similar to my post as a general concept.
Post edited by StikMC on1 -
Well, it'd make me slug survivors instead of two hooking and letting everyone leave. I really don't want +MMR.
0 -
F rank. Kind of insulting for someone not that skilled lol.
0 -
I like it but what do you get out of this? If it's only a rank with no real function then I don't see many people changing their play style.
1
