Please check if your issue has already been reported first!

When reporting a bug, please follow the template provided, otherwise the report will be declined. The information requested is vital to allow us to correctly reproduce and then fix what you are reporting.
The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

Survivors in wrong order [again]

MarbleThrone
MarbleThrone Member Posts: 458

This is something I've reported more often on the forums, and with the most recent patch (8.1.2) a few things have gone wrong again. Some time ago, for example, Ash and Jane were swapped (Jane was added before Ash) but this was later fixed. Unfortunately, the same error has returned.

In the first screenshot, the correct order should be:
Dwight - Meg - Claudette - Jake
Nea - Laurie - Ace - Bill
Feng - David - Quentin - Tapp

In the second screenshot, only Jane and Ash should be swapped.

All killers are now in the correct order, fortunately, with Myers taking his place before Hag, as he should :).

PC, Steam, Windows 11.

1
1 votes

Acknowledged · Last Updated

Thank you for your report, it has been updated and is under review.

Comments

  • MarbleThrone
    MarbleThrone Member Posts: 458

    Still present in 8.2.0, both when filtering on Date as well as Default.

    Jane and Ash are in the correct position again.

    PC, Steam, Windows 11.

  • MarbleThrone
    MarbleThrone Member Posts: 458
    edited August 28

    The order was different, with Laurie coming after Nea (as she's supposed to, release-date wise), somewhere in July of this year.

    Now, I did learn in the meantime that there is apparently an automatic distinction between FREE characters included in the game and paid DLC characters, with the FREE characters coming first, right after one another regardless of release date (meaning Bill and David are supposed to appear right after Nea), followed by the PAID characters.

    In that case, the order as we see it now is actually correct. I hadn't considered this. And if that is indeed how it works, then please disregard this report :).