We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

Is Shoulder the Burden really bad for Killers?

If a Survivor is swaping hook states, and the Killer is going for a 4K, the Killer will still need a total of 12 Hooks, correct? (Assuming nobody is left on hook to go to the next stage)

In other words, it doesn't change how much hooking a Killer must do, right?

«1

Comments

  • Devil_hit11
    Devil_hit11 Member Posts: 9,073

    technically if all survivors not on hook have 1 hook state and the person on hook has 2. swap the hook state allows the killer to proxy camp and re-hook the other person into death hook.

    the perk only allows you to spread hook state for first hook stage. for second stage, killers can proxy camp and tunnel survivor.

  • tyantlmumagjiaonuha
    tyantlmumagjiaonuha Member Posts: 598

    This is a very powerful perk for survivor teams because it gives them more time to kick the first one out of the game. It is also useful in the sense that it makes a strong perk even stronger, as it is even stronger if you have Off-Record, DH, etc.

  • KatsuhxP
    KatsuhxP Member Posts: 973

    The thing tunneling wants to archive ins't getting less than 12 hooks (that's what camping is for), it's killing as soon as possible. Shoulder the burden shoves the time it takes to tunnel this person out to the back so it's making it harder and is therefore bad for me as a killer.

  • CountOfTheFog
    CountOfTheFog Member Posts: 2,526

    But say I'm running the perk and I've been hooked once already and I use it on another Survivor who is on 1st hook. You're actually better off now, right? Because before I used the perk you had nobody on 2nd hook. Now I'm technically ready to go to my final hook, right?

  • KatsuhxP
    KatsuhxP Member Posts: 973

    Yeah sure absolutely, but it's just this specific case and a horrible use of this perk. Normally someone that doesn't have stages should have used it to be efficient, otherwise you just change my victim, although I have to say that's also nice to have. You could save the poor dwight with 300 hours if use it on him and the killer switches on you with 5k hours as excampel, so you as a team have a better chance by dictating who the killer has to tunnel xD

  • CountOfTheFog
    CountOfTheFog Member Posts: 2,526

    I was so confused when it was used when I was Freddy last night. I swear I think I hooked David 4 times.

  • KatsuhxP
    KatsuhxP Member Posts: 973

    Funny perk isn't it? At least it gives you the information who used it and then you know who to tunnel xD

  • Coffeecrashing
    Coffeecrashing Member Posts: 3,848

    It really doesn’t take that much skill or coordination for SWFs to do this. If a survivor is hooked, then one of the survivors (that hasn’t been hooked yet) just uses their voice comms to tell everyone else in the SWF they are going for the unhook.

    That’s it. It’s really simple with voice comms.

    And I have seen a lot of survivors use this perk, and I have seen a lot of survivors purposely stacking or daisy chaining this perk.

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404

    The way I understand it, the truly game-breaking part is that SWFs can use it circularly.

    For example, if the hook states are 2-0-0-0 someone can use it and it becomes 1-1-0-0. Then if the killer downs the person who used the burden, it becomes 1-2-0-0, but then someone else can use the perk again and it's 1-1-1-0. Effectively, this forces the killer to go through 1-1-1-1 stages and require 6 hooks before the first kill instead of 3, effectively game-breaking.

    The game-breaking part is not that it reduces the total number of hooks to win (it doesn't) but it delays the fist kill, making the 4v1 longer, during which gens get progressed 30% faster than in 3v1.

    Unfortunately while it's a very strong perk for SWFs, it won't improve anything for solos because it's tied to a perk and can be ruined so easily by your teammates stealing the unhook. If the killer tunnels, there are ALREADY game-breaking perks in the game, these are Decisive and OtR, which everyone regards as the two strongest perks in the game, and yet it didn't prevent tunneling at all because the majority of players don't use it in soloQ.

    BHVR has to stop locking anti-tunnel mechanics behind perks because it's counterproductive for balance, it only make coordinated teams stronger while effectively doing nothing for the majority of the playerbase.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,677

    Yeah, that's pretty much it. It's funny how people say the perk is like a 5th killer perk. It literally destroys tunneling, which people have been complaining about forever. If you're not smart enough or coordinated enough to use it, that's on you. The perk's design is fine. From the killer's POV it's a serious problem to contend with. Killers have an issue with not having enough time to do their objective, so they take shortcuts like tunneling. If they have to hook the same person 5 times, they will lose. It was hard enough to hook someone 3 times.

    In no way is it a benefit to killer.

  • NarkoTri1er
    NarkoTri1er Member Posts: 651

    it doesn't change amount of hooking for the killer, but it changes the hooking order and prioritization, meaning it will hardcore force killers that are too weak to spread hooks into a lose-lose situation, especially if you take in mind the fact that this way, single survivor can proc Deliverance/Wicked 2+ times, single survivor that is not that good in chase can literally buy enormous amount of time for their team by staying on first hook twice after getting StB-ed by a survivor that is a good player and can easily play around additional hook state. So:

    • it's a brutally good perk for soloQ that let's you basically carry your team by helping people that are getting tunneled tremendously (if they decide not to go next on hook);
    • is a final piece of a complete nullifying of killer's hook pressure puzzle;
    • if good surv has it, killer is led into a lose-lose situation, since they will either waste a lot of time chasing that survivor or chasing someone else + unhooked one for +1 hook state

    this perk won't have high pickrate in pubs because average survivor player lacks macro knowledge and will thus fail to understand it's value (same as with Deli, Wicked, Reassurance etc.)

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404

    I'm all for anti-tunneling, but this perk is not the way to go.

    It gives the anti-tunneling ability to SWFs, instead of soloQ survivors.

    SoloQ survivors will have to rush the unhook in order to not get it stolen by their teammates, unhooking too early and effectively making camping and tunneling worse.

    Meanwhile, BHVR will think tunneling is not a problem anymore, because they have introduced a perk to fight it, even though it does not address the problem.

  • crogers271
    crogers271 Member Posts: 1,907

    But that's just generally true of pretty much any activation perk in DbD. Deliverance, Wicked. We're Gonna Live Forever, etc. all rely on rushing an action before you might wish to because otherwise a teammate, who doesn't know you have it, might make a completely logical play on their part.

    I think there are a couple of ways BHVR could relatively easily address this, but they've chosen not to.

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404

    It actually affects even non-tunneling killers.

    For example, if the killer gets hook states 1-1-1-0, then 2-1-1-0, then they are clearly not tunneling. Yet someone uses the burden and now it's 1-1-1-1. The killer played nice and yet the perk still works against them.

    This perk is not particularly anti-tunnel, it basically affects every killer who doesn't go for 1-1-1-1.

    Meanwhile, BHVR will think they addressed tunneling, even though this perk does nothing for solos.

  • SoGo
    SoGo Member Posts: 1,529

    It can be a benefit, if you happen to camp the survivor who gets resqued by the StB user.

    A niche and rare situation, yes, but one that can happen.

  • NarkoTri1er
    NarkoTri1er Member Posts: 651

    it has effects if you don't tunnel in case where you don't go to just fresh hook everyone over and over + having single survivor be able to Deli 2+ times and basically be used as hook meat to generate 0 hook pressure for killer is extremely useful, especially when person using StB is very good in chases

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404

    The first survivor wasn't necessarily just unhooked, he might even be the one coming back to rescue the person who used the burden.

    Full example, say you never tunnel and every time, you chase the unhooker:

    Without shoulder the burden:

    1. 0-0-0-0
    2. 1-0-0-0
    3. 1-1-0-0
    4. 2-1-0-0 (survivor 1 rescued survivor 2)
    5. 2-1-1-0 (survivor 3 rescued survivor 1)
    6. 3-1-1-0 (survivor 1 rescued survivor 3)

    → 1 kill

    With shoulder the burden:

    1. 0-0-0-0
    2. 1-0-0-0
    3. 1-1-0-0
    4. 2-1-0-0 (survivor 1 rescued survivor 2)
    5. 1-1-2-0 (survivor 3 rescued survivor 1 and used shoulder the burden)
    6. 2-1-2-0 (survivor 3 rescued survivor 2)

    → 0 kill

    The killer is not tunneling in this example, chasing the unhooker every time, and yet the perk denied them a kill.

    You can check that in both cases, the survivors are hooked and unhooked in the exact same order, the only difference is survivor 3 used shoulder the burden at step 5.

    I think getting your first kill at 6 hooks would be considered by everyone to be fair, but the perk can deny it.

  • AmpersandUnderscore
    AmpersandUnderscore Member Posts: 1,887

    I mean, in this magical hypothetical scenario you also have to have 4 survivors all running the perk for this to even be guaranteed (along with some pretty tight coordination). Otherwise random chance dictates that there's a much, much greater chance the one person who brought STB is already hooked in that case.

    And if you have 4 copies of one perk on the survivor team and only one of those 4 even gets value, that sounds like a gigantic win for the killer already.

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404

    This is not a "magical hypothetical scenario" at all? It will literally work in every scenario that doesn't go 1-1-1-1, I just gave one example across hundreds of possible ones. In particular, it can also happen in 2-1-0-0, and now you have 2x more chance that one of the unhookers has the perk. It won't happen every game sure, but empirically I'd say the perk already gets used ~1/10 of the time against me right now and I don't tunnel, and it has a game-changing effect when it happens. (To be fair though, it was counter-productive for the survivor team half of the time, so right now it's not frustrating to play against, but it could be in the future)

    What do you mean by:

    there's a much much greater chance the one person who brought STB is already hooked in this case

    Given a 2-1-1-0 scenario, the chance that the person who brought STB has not been already hooked, is simply 25%. 1 out of 4. That's quite common.

  • NarkoTri1er
    NarkoTri1er Member Posts: 651

    this ain't a magical hypothetical scenario at all lol.

    are we really going over another scenario of complete lack of awareness for true perk potential?

    We already saw it with lack of awareness for aggressive usage of anti-tunneling perks thinking they are only good against tunneling, we already saw it with lack of awareness for hook greeding thinking it's only good when killer is camping. Can we please once see someone actually realize value of perks instead having a 99% narrowed viewpoint for them?

  • DragonMasterDarren
    DragonMasterDarren Member Posts: 2,872

    I have seen the perk used, I have tried to get value out of this perk, it has done absolutely nothing of notice beyond getting somebody killed sooner then they otherwise would have

    This perk is not good unless the killer is actively letting survivors get value from it

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404

    I am not saying that the perk is too strong or too weak, I'm just saying it is not an anti-tunnel perk like most people thought at first glance. It will affect even killers who spread hooks.

  • Grigerbest
    Grigerbest Member Posts: 1,836
    edited December 4

    Yes.

    It's messing with my hook counting and I accidentally killing a survivor earlier, makes me look like a tunneler.

  • Coffeecrashing
    Coffeecrashing Member Posts: 3,848

    If you honestly think that stacking and daisy chaining STB really is a magical hypothetical scenario, then you should be ok if that part of STB gets nerfed. Because why bother defending that part of the perk from being nerfed, if you honestly don't think it is realistically going to happen?

    Nerf suggestions:

    1. A specific survivor can only use STB, if they haven't had the perk used on them yet. (no daisy chaining)
    2. STB can only be used on a specific survivor, if they haven't used the perk on someone else yet. (no daisy chaining)
    3. STB can only be used on a specific survivor, if they haven't had the perk used on them yet. (no stacking)

  • crogers271
    crogers271 Member Posts: 1,907

    But I don't know how you could do that. If you gave it a condition like 'if more than one survivor has been hooked, StB deactivates', it would be absurdly weak. And if the goal was to completely and absolutely eliminate tunneling, like if that was BHVR's new design philosophy, then they'd go with a basekit mechanic.

    Like Unbreakable is a anti-slugging perk, but it doesn't mean the only time you get value out of it is against a full out slugging killer.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,701

    But there is not tactical advantage here because survivor 3 just sent themselves to death hook.

  • AmpersandUnderscore
    AmpersandUnderscore Member Posts: 1,887

    There are a bunch of factors not included in your assessment here that play a big factor.

    A huge one being: just because people bring the perk doesn't mean they're going to get value from it. They may get to second stage first (tunneling), they may not get the unhook, and most importantly, it may not be a smart idea to activate the perk of the killer is camping and you'll be insta downed for no gain.

    You also have the problem that even just moving hook stages around isn't always going to be a net benefit for the survivor team. If your "weak" player, or someone with a meme build, makes themselves the target it will net lose time for the team over someone who can loop better or has a chase oriented build.

    I think you misread what I wrote because you responded to the wrong thing. In the 2-1-1-0 scenario, there's a 75% chance the one STB player is already hooked meaning they're either already on death hook, or putting themselves on death hook to use the perk. Which is much much greater than the 25% to use it completely safely.

    And all of that is contingent on the other factors I mentioned above as well.

  • NarkoTri1er
    NarkoTri1er Member Posts: 651

    so...Reassurance, DS, OTR, Deliverance and Wicked are also bad by this logic?

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404

    They should go with a basekit effect, yes. Extending hook timers by +10 sec for example was an excellent move against camping, it is straightforward (no need to learn yet another mechanic, important for new players), does little for SWFs, while making a big difference for solos.

    Against tunneling, they could give something like OtR basekit: no noise, no scratch marks for the unhooked survivor, extend basekit BT to 90 sec. If it's too strong, then give something like Make Your Choice basekit for killers, which gives a reward for not tunneling. When it's just a "too weak" vs "too strong" question, then we have solved the problem, as that can always be fine-tuned.

    In contrast when it's a question of "too weak for solos" vs. "too strong for SWFs" then that can NOT be fine-tuned as no matter which direction you move you will make the game unfair for one side. STB does not address tunneling, instead it pushes it even more in the "solo vs SWF" direction, which is completely backwards. On top of that, it happens to also work against non-tunneling killers. It is an unhealthy perk for the game no matter which side you play imo.

  • Saiph
    Saiph Member Posts: 404
    edited December 5

    I've re-read the conversation and now I realize we talk about something different.

    When I say the scenario can be "common", I'm not saying it will be "common" for survivors to get value from the perk, that's not at all the topic of the message you initially quoted and in fact they will NOT get common value as you have pointed out (a given survivor gets value at most 25% of the time at most).

    My message is from the perspective of a killer playing nice. What I'm saying is that it will be common for them to get hit by the perk, the exact percentage can be debated but let's say that it is 25%, I think you agree that it would be not just "common" but actually broken for a perk labelled as "anti-tunneling" to still trigger 25% of the time against someone who never tunnels. In reality my experience so far is that it triggers much less than 25% and more like 10% of the time, but that's still a lot. Imagine if you never tunneled and still got hit by DS about 10% of the time while chasing the unhooker, and then people tell you on the forum to stop tunneling, you'd have a reason to be annoyed, well that's what will happen with this perk. In the conversation you quoted, the 2-1-1-0 scenario was just to show a concrete example where that happens, I replied that to GeneralV and some others who said if you don't tunnel you will never get affected by it.

  • ChuckingWong
    ChuckingWong Member Posts: 429
    edited December 5

    Its another one of those things where its like…

    Yea its extremely valuable and nice to have but good luck getting people to run it in any cohesive way outside of

    coordinated swf


    And even if someone takes it, its hard to work around things when you lack all basic communication. It can turn into a complete troll feed perk very easily in soloQ

    Playing soloQ you already have trouble getting people to take things like reassurance, we'll make it, kindred, etc….

    Altruism isnt the most attractive perks for most players

    Which is big sad.

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,701

    Just had it used against me as killer, and yeah it really doesn't do much if the killer isn't hard tunneling:

    And I don't mean it as a jab towards this Taurie here, I think she played well. But the perk doesn't have much value if the hook states aren't concentrated on a single survivor.

  • GlamourousLeviathan
    GlamourousLeviathan Member Posts: 1,093

    4 survivors alive means more people working on gens, more people healing each other, more people to waste time chasing. So obviously swapping a hook state is massively game changing since it's more time the game is in a state where 4 survivors are alive.

  • Rulebreaker
    Rulebreaker Member Posts: 2,101

    We're pretty much just joining the echo chamber of it doesn't do much if you're not hard tunneling someone out.

    For what it's worth, it still has some value outside of this scenario (long as the user and rescuee aren't potatoes) but since it only moves hook states and announces itself with user, it's not a major difference. Someone will be closer to death no matter what.

  • Autharia
    Autharia Member Posts: 457

    If you aren't hard tunneling this perk turns more in to a killer sided perk like invocations. Letting you instant down the one that used it if you put little effort in to it.

  • DragonMasterDarren
    DragonMasterDarren Member Posts: 2,872

    None of those perks listed actively get you killed sooner if you try and use them

  • NarkoTri1er
    NarkoTri1er Member Posts: 651

    none does StB if you know not to unhook in front of the killer and know how to chase :D