Kill Switch update: The issue affecting Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater has been fixed and the cosmetic has been reenabled in all queues with this update.

Games with less survivors and ranked

Hi, I just wanted to mention how much I hate it when I end up in a game of 3 or less survivors, always lose, and get ranked down for it (let’s be honest, doing less generators doesn’t really even it out). I have no doubt the talented devs of DBD could balance it differently, OR they could simply make games where the survivors are outnumbered from the start not count for ranked. Thanks for reading!
 

Comments

  • Aven_Fallen
    Aven_Fallen Member Posts: 16,551

    While a 3v1 is frustrating, it is still winable, even if the game is not designed for 3v1. You will not "always" lose. Also you will not always rank down, because for ranking down you would need to play bad.

    For 2v1, yeah, you most likely cannot win those. Simply search for the Killer and he either will let you go away or you are at least not wasting time in this match.

  • I do agree they are still winnable, even 1v1s are winnable. It's just a lot more difficult for survivors and they shouldn't get ranked down for failing. I also agree that if you do well enough, you can still rank up whilst not escaping, but again it's just a lot more difficult and I think it would just be easier if they didn't rank you down.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @aconcernedcitizen said:
    Hi, I just wanted to mention how much I hate it when I end up in a game of 3 or less survivors, always lose, and get ranked down for it (let’s be honest, doing less generators doesn’t really even it out). I have no doubt the talented devs of DBD could balance it differently, OR they could simply make games where the survivors are outnumbered from the start not count for ranked. Thanks for reading!
     

    Well ######### happens if survivors DC