Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on this and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
Operation Health and stop new content?
Little explanation: operation health means that the devs focus on improving the quality of dbd. This contains fixing bugs, balancing, improving fps and QoL changes. Eventually reworks would be part of this. Therefore devs would stop making new content on focus on the current content till the game is in a very good state and after that the DLCs would be a thing again
Operation Health and stop new content? 61 votes
18 votes
32 votes
1 vote
8 votes
2 votes
Comments
-
Yes, operation health and no DLC till everything is fixed
Making polls on the forums is pretty cool. When was this made a thing?
1 -
What bugs? DbD is fine, there isn't much what bothers me. Keep doing DLCs.
Game is fine overall DbD isn't unplayable with bugs everywhere.
DLCs won't stop the roadmap will keep going on and what bugs there are will be removed over time with new updates.
New ones will be introduced then those will be removed after that...
Its a cycle of development is to ever continue after fixing every single bug they'd come back anyway when they add again.
0 -
Do even more DLCs! I want 5 or even 6 chapters per year!
I want this to be comparable to a MUGEN fan game in terms of roster.
2 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
Balance it out
Operation health in R6 only broke one chapter, the polish season
Make only 3 chapters, and put the 4th into paragraphs
0 -
I love how there is not option for:
Dlc and bugs are two different teams, and operation health FAILED rainbow 6.
They're all just different versions of: bugs exist, dlc shouldnt, but either agree or disagree options. It's not a poll, its expecting a specific answer.
1 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
Two chapters, but fix things like keys asap.
0 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
2-3 days ago.
1 -
What bugs? DbD is fine, there isn't much what bothers me. Keep doing DLCs.
DbD is obviously the most broken game to ever exist and the dlc rate must be lowered for this game to even stand a chance at redemption!
/s
2 -
No, I didnt say there was no option saying it's fine. The game HAS bugs and SHOULD be fixed.
But an entire operation health/slowing dlcs has nothing to do with it, and did NOT work for the other major game that tried it.
0 -
What bugs? DbD is fine, there isn't much what bothers me. Keep doing DLCs.
In 2-3 years DbD will be on par with an average fighting game roster at the current rate.
0 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
Creating new content and "balancing" the game are done by different teams.
there is barely reason to stop creating new content while simultaneously balancing the game.
While it'd be nice if the devs could shift focus a bit more and maybe work on multiple changes at a time, atleast theyre going in the right direction.
0 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
I see 4 people that want to watch the world burn.
0 -
What bugs? DbD is fine, there isn't much what bothers me. Keep doing DLCs.
The world will burn then.
This isn't the timeline where bhvr decides to cancel their roadmap we have 2 dlcs coming in the next 5 months.
They will fix bugs but not change the plan in such a massive way.
0 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
The line that the people that fix bugs and create new content are different is BS. What matters is where they put their money and whether they hire more people to fix bugs vs create new content.
1 -
Do even more DLCs! I want 5 or even 6 chapters per year!
I didn't say the average fighting game roster. I said MUGEN. ;)
2 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
Knowing and wanting is the difference.
0 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
Absolutely, while new content is good in that it brings people back in and its new and exciting
We have over 100 perks for each side and only like 10 of them are actively used. Old killers, perks, items and addons need buffs, reworks, and QOL. By doing this it will mean the new content that does come will be far more polished, interesting, and better balanced. The game has a tremendous amount of content but most of it goes unused operation health will be vital to the game, not more DLC that can only "band-aid" problems
1 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
I made a poll a while ago about this
They should definitely do something like this, just not the whole year, without new content for a whole year people will stop playing
0 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
Yeah man I love polls, it's fun and also gives a good overview of the communities opinion. I think I was the first one doing a poll besides the devs, I noticed by random it was possible and tried it out
0 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
Uhm, you are aware that after every new DLC something new gets broken which hasn't to do with the DLC directly? Just look at the stranger things DLC -> EGC timer broke, Trapper traps bugged again etc
1 -
Yes, operation health but just less DLCs (2-3 chapters per year instead of 4)
This here! It's the same logic with cosmetics. People always say "but the cosmetic team is a different team" and I'm like "yeah no bs sherlock, but it's the money investment and the people they hire what matters".
1 -
Yes, operation health and no DLC till everything is fixed
Not neccesarily. I mean if a new killer is being developed they will need the game designers to focus on the killer and their perks instead of balancing stuff currently in the game. Also people who work on fixing bugs would have to focus on the new content and those bugs verses current bugs.
0
