Endgame UNFAIR
I feel that the game ending system is unfair to all parties.
While running out of time The punished parties are only survivors.
Why is the killer not punished?
Survivors infringe on the actual killer.
But the killer who harasses the survivors by allowing time to pass
But the survivors were punished unilaterally unjustly
Or this game was created especially for the killer To have so many special privileges ?
I hope this topic will be considered. Thank you
Comments
-
The End Game Collapse was intended to avoid taking killer as a hostage. Perhaps it's not the best solution but is the best idea at the moment.
0 -
Wow. This is certainly one of the most entitled posts I've seen in my time in dbd.
Well. As a famous man once said: "Aw #########. Here we go again."
The timer exists as a massive pressure point for survivors, to make them "gtfo or die". This is to make the end game significantly more exciting and give the killer a final chance to sneak in one more kill before the game ends.
The end game collapse does not actively punish survivors. You are merely under a time limit before you get a game over. In fact, the collapse gives survivors a slower clock if somebody is hooked or downed.
The endgame does not punish the killer in any regard, and the fact you are confused by that is mind-boggling. If the killer received a penalty during the collapse, then what is the point of collapse if killers don't get use out of it?
Again, the collapse is meant to force survivors out of the game, or possibly die. If the killer is chasing a survivor, (which wastes the timer), it's the killer literally doing his job to kill. Also, I've never seen a killer harass survivors in any regard, so I do think you're only projecting.
The killer has no special priviliges. The devs implemented it because before the creation of collapse, survivor's purposefully held the endgame hostage. They simply waited at the gate till they got bored, or when the killer came, which they are met by plenty of tbags. It was frustrating for killer, that's for sure.
The collapse is in no regard "unfair". It's design was intentional to force survivors out of the game. Also puts in more risk in the endgame when they save people. The killer has not failed until the game itself ends. Neither has the survivor won until they actually leave.
What if I told you... That you are not entitled to an escape. The killer lives to prevent you from escaping, and you're being mad at a mechanic that favors a killer, that in the end: really only has the capacity to kill everyone at once if survivors fail to escape in time. If that happens, that's on you. A complex mechanic is countered by simply leaving, but your noob mind refuses to believe that. So you call it "unfair" and try to make it easier for yourself.
You're arguing against a balanced mechanic. It won't be changed anytime soon until there is some actual arguments with effective facts upon why this is the case, which don't exist because it is indeed balanced. This post is not one of them.
0 -
You’ve never seen a killer harass survivors?
My god what game are you playing because it ain’t this one.
0 -
"The endgame is unfair to all parties."
Ok, interesting. I wonder what this guy means by that.
"It only punishes survivors"
Wait, what?
0
