Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.
Access the survey HERE!
How many of you still play DeathGarden
There's not enough players in my opinion to sustain. At least not enough active players. Maybe play Death garden please let me know why you play it or why you stopped playing it down below.
Yes I know this isn't a dead by daylight post but it still related to the company.
Comments
-
No one plays it cause its balanced and somewhat challenging.
Since a large portion of the community in DBD play survivor, and many of them are toxic, its more fun for them.
I personally like Death Garden, I enjoy playing Hunter, even when the 5 runners in question are a group of friends playing, I stand a chance with whatever weapons I am using, the ability to run across the map is so useful.
If I want this sort of power, its Nurse, sometimes Billy, but Nurse.
4 -
No advertising, no content, etc..
The game is fun has potential but they forced the release and that cucked them imo.3 -
Interesting adds...1
-
I have the game but it didn't run as well as I wanted it to. I was going to wait and see if it got any better, what with it being in Early Access and all. The game swiftly died though, so that's a big oof.
1 -
I love DBD and the horror movie style it's got going for it. Big horror fan. I like sci-fi too, but in comparison it's really blah. We already have a million sci-fi shooters, the only thing it has to separate itself is the asymmetrical gameplay--which is cool, but not enough to justify an early access $30 purchase. Last time I bought something in early access it was Paragon, and everybody knows how that turned out. I have no love for that business model, and I'll have to vote with my wallet on this one.0
-
I agree, I was saying this the whole time.switch said:No advertising, no content, etc..
The game is fun has potential but they forced the release and that cucked them imo.0 -
Not sure why they started a new a project when the current one has all the issues it has and lacks dedicated servers. But let's make a new game with dedicated servers
. Personally to me death garden looks like a clone of this game but with guns but I also know very little about it but I don't need another game similar to dead by daylight. This one frustrates me enough with stupid broken pallets being broken because of hitboxes and lag. Dedicated servers may have fixed that but instead of doing that they made a new game with dedicated servers that not a lot of people are even playing and that peak doesn't look very good either. Enough said I'm ranting and sort of ragging on bvhr but I love this game I just want it to work properly, get dedicated servers, and be the king of survival horror games. 1 -
@Countfunkular Death Garden is unfortunately a Dead by Daylight clone. I tried it during the short free period and it was decent but it had several flaws.
The primary flaw for myself, anyway, was that it was an almost blatant copy of Dead by Daylight. A group of 4 (+1) weak runners (survivors) have to escape the Death Garden (Entity's Trials) by using coordination to complete the objective.
Gameplay-wise the Runners (survivors) are locked in third person while the Hunter (Killer) is mostly confined to first person (there are emotes for brief 3rd person). After enough runners are downed the Hunter can execute (sacrifice) them at the Bloodpost (hook). By the way the "Death Garden" is randomly generated, like the Entity's trials.
Overall it was just a shameless copy except in the following regard:
All players had to gather upgrade parts for their abilities to increase their effectiveness. This, and the fact that there were 2 objective varieties are the only content differences. Sure, there was also a hub/lobby you could walk around in, but that was due to the wasted dedicated servers that Dbd lacks (and needs).
It was a decent game in my eyes as I am a Dbd fan. However, I prefer the source material and the lower cost.
0 -
@OGlilSPOOK20 said:
switch said:No advertising, no content, etc..
The game is fun has potential but they forced the release and that cucked them imo.
I agree, I was saying this the whole time.
To add to this I also feel the general theme isn't as appealing to players. This sort of sci-fi prisoner fight thing just isn't as fun as DBD "horror" theme. The game is fun but not fun enough to draw new players to buy it at full price.
2 -
Maybe they should make it free to play and just sell the cosmetics?MegaWaffle said:@OGlilSPOOK20 said:
switch said:No advertising, no content, etc..
The game is fun has potential but they forced the release and that cucked them imo.
I agree, I was saying this the whole time.
To add to this I also feel the general theme isn't as appealing to players. This sort of sci-fi prisoner fight thing just isn't as fun as DBD "horror" theme. The game is fun but not fun enough to draw new players to buy it at full price.
1 -
Wasted money, they could've improve their Main game so much, but naw
4 -
BHVR: ", Sure Dead by Daylight has a large player base. . .
. . . but it's not new and therefore cannot be "hip" or "the next big thing".
0 -
Never liked it in beta, called it back then that it'd flop, and it has. I don't Like seeing games fail, but I must admit I did enjoy seeing the steam charts being so low. Rip DG, never even started IMO.
0 -
Death Garden
0
