We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

Toxic streamer

Wolf74
Wolf74 Member Posts: 2,959
in General Discussions

If people like this are playing like toxic MFs live on stream, why don't they get banned?
They basically give prove to their own griefing of other player.
And they are so nooby, that they do not even realize their accusations are completely wrong and just plain salt.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivizT4Hfvj0

Comments

  • preetygoodforumsofar
    preetygoodforumsofar Member Posts: 81

    if tru3 send a email with the video to report them they should be ban

  • CoolAKn
    CoolAKn Member Posts: 677

    I think it's just like the guy said in the video, the devs just don't care. It should be up to us as a community to not emulate those toxic behaviors. Those survivors gained nothing from being a jerk to him. He had a pretty good attitude through it though.

  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Plippy
    Plippy Member Posts: 187

    Ever been so salty you tanked your own game? Dis guy do.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    Toxicity is popular in DBD and the devs profit from it.

  • theArashi
    theArashi Member Posts: 998

    Well, they do target player and admit to it.
    It is against twitch TOS because it does count as stream sniping and it is against dbd rules with video proof.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    Classic example of ochido wannabes.
    Imagine what better place DBD would be if the devs would get rid of them.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    Classic example of ochido wannabes.
    Imagine what better place DBD would be if the devs would get rid of them.

  • Grey87
    Grey87 Member Posts: 346
    edited September 2018

    @Wolf74 said:
    If people like this are playing like toxic MFs live on stream, why don't they get banned?

    Because you can't ban for that.
    You can let people die on hook if you want, it's not something that will get you banned. It's basically the same as not coming for a save at all.

  • Vietfox
    Vietfox Member Posts: 3,823
    iceman2kx said:

    @only1biggs said:
    I don't care for tru3, or the ######### that pours from his mouth, but he didn't do anything wrong. The survivors were salty little bitches is all

    Just curious why you think that? I've been semi-following him since I started a couple months ago and he seems like a genuinely good dude. He has an "anti-toxic" approach to playing the game and I respect that.

    As far as the video goes. The survivors were just looking for attention because it was a big streamer. They were probably salty because they couldn't bully Tru3 and instead got owned. So they took their petty "vengeance" for cheap lulz.

    Saw him once escaping through the door after being saved by Meg.
    She unhooked him, later on Meg needed help cause was on the hook, gates were open and he had the chance to rescue her (or at least create some sort of safe diversion), left without thinking twice.
    Stopped watching him.
  • iceman2kx
    iceman2kx Member Posts: 462

    @Grey87 said:

    @Wolf74 said:
    If people like this are playing like toxic MFs live on stream, why don't they get banned?

    Because you can't ban for that.
    You can let people die on hook if you want, it's not something that will get you banned. It's basically the same as not coming for a save at all.

    It's definitely not the same as not coming to save at all. You're blocking/deterring other survivors from coming to save you by doing this plus you're contributing absolutely nothing to the game (like staying on a generator). It's pretty toxic but I don't think they should get banned for it. It's unfortunately just one of the consequences of being a popular streamer; people will do stuff like this to you because a lot of people are watching them.

  • BottledWater
    BottledWater Member Posts: 248

    @Grey87 said:

    @Wolf74 said:
    If people like this are playing like toxic MFs live on stream, why don't they get banned?

    Because you can't ban for that.
    You can let people die on hook if you want, it's not something that will get you banned. It's basically the same as not coming for a save at all.

    They admitted that they were going to sandbag him and they unhook spammed him several times so that he couldn't be saved even if somebody would change their mind. They basically set out to make his match unenjoyable and it should be banned.

  • Wolf74
    Wolf74 Member Posts: 2,959

    @Grey87 said:

    @Wolf74 said:
    If people like this are playing like toxic MFs live on stream, why don't they get banned?

    Because you can't ban for that.
    You can let people die on hook if you want, it's not something that will get you banned. It's basically the same as not coming for a save at all.

    That is "griefing". This is not simply "let someone die.
    They even announced it before the match even started that they intend to sandbag and "massage" him.

  • Master
    Master Member Posts: 10,200

    @Grey87 said:

    @Wolf74 said:
    If people like this are playing like toxic MFs live on stream, why don't they get banned?

    Because you can't ban for that.
    You can let people die on hook if you want, it's not something that will get you banned. It's basically the same as not coming for a save at all.

    They bodyblocked another survivor in corner, also canceling the unhook actions is griefing, just like mori canceling is.
    Both is bannable

  • only1biggs
    only1biggs Member Posts: 1,178

    @iceman2kx said:

    @only1biggs said:
    I don't care for tru3, or the ######### that pours from his mouth, but he didn't do anything wrong. The survivors were salty little bitches is all

    Just curious why you think that? I've been semi-following him since I started a couple months ago and he seems like a genuinely good dude. He has an "anti-toxic" approach to playing the game and I respect that.

    As far as the video goes. The survivors were just looking for attention because it was a big streamer. They were probably salty because they couldn't bully Tru3 and instead got owned. So they took their petty "vengeance" for cheap lulz.

    Think what? What are you asking me?

  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Someissues
    Someissues Member Posts: 1,604

    Those people need to be banned
    where are the mods?

    @Peanits

  • Esheon
    Esheon Member Posts: 568
    Please keep in mind that Tru3 noted he did not want anyone to start a witch hunt based on this video.
  • redsopine1
    redsopine1 Member Posts: 1,437
    Seriously WGAF toxicity only gains power from reaction's (depending on what happens) but this just seems attention seeking just do what he did ignore them and to the oersib saying he left a team mate to die was he injured or on his last life because sometimes they do that because they don't want to die
  • Might_Oakk
    Might_Oakk Member Posts: 1,243

    Tru3 destroyed that Meg at Ruin skillchecks

  • MegaWaffle
    MegaWaffle Member Posts: 4,172

    @Grey87 said:

    @Wolf74 said:
    If people like this are playing like toxic MFs live on stream, why don't they get banned?

    Because you can't ban for that.
    You can let people die on hook if you want, it's not something that will get you banned. It's basically the same as not coming for a save at all.

    They didn't just let him die on the hook they kept fake grabbing him off only to let go and even said in the video they were trolling him because of their last match vs him when he played Nurse.

    Big difference between choosing to let someone die and admitting to trolling a guy while also having video evidence to prove what you were doing.

  • Unknown
    Unknown
    This content has been removed.
  • Tradebaron
    Tradebaron Member Posts: 135
    Wait I'm confused. How did tru3 get the audio of the other survivors?
  • CoolAKn
    CoolAKn Member Posts: 677

    @Tradebaron said:
    Wait I'm confused. How did tru3 get the audio of the other survivors?

    Someone probably found their streams and clipped those moments.

  • Tradebaron
    Tradebaron Member Posts: 135
    Ah right that would make sense. I guess it worked out that the others were also streaming. Seems really lucky actually.
  • Incarnate
    Incarnate Member Posts: 677

    It's not the streamer who's toxic, but the other survivor players, which should be banned for unsportsmanslike behaviour.

  • SnakeSound222
    SnakeSound222 Member Posts: 4,467
    edited September 2018

    @Vietfox said:
    iceman2kx said:

    @only1biggs said:

    I don't care for tru3, or the ######### that pours from his mouth, but he didn't do anything wrong. The survivors were salty little bitches is all

    Just curious why you think that? I've been semi-following him since I started a couple months ago and he seems like a genuinely good dude. He has an "anti-toxic" approach to playing the game and I respect that.

    As far as the video goes. The survivors were just looking for attention because it was a big streamer. They were probably salty because they couldn't bully Tru3 and instead got owned. So they took their petty "vengeance" for cheap lulz.

    Saw him once escaping through the door after being saved by Meg.
    She unhooked him, later on Meg needed help cause was on the hook, gates were open and he had the chance to rescue her (or at least create some sort of safe diversion), left without thinking twice.
    Stopped watching him.

    Spoiler alert: Survivors aren't meant to work as a team. They're just four people in the same place with the same goals. They are not required to save each other.

  • SnakeSound222
    SnakeSound222 Member Posts: 4,467

    @meshugganah said:
    SnakeSound222 said:

    @Vietfox said:

    iceman2kx said:

    @only1biggs said:

I don't care for tru3, or the ######### that pours from his mouth, but he didn't do anything wrong. The survivors were salty little bitches is all



Just curious why you think that? I've been semi-following him since I started a couple months ago and he seems like a genuinely good dude. He has an "anti-toxic" approach to playing the game and I respect that.

As far as the video goes. The survivors were just looking for attention because it was a big streamer. They were probably salty because they couldn't bully Tru3 and instead got owned. So they took their petty "vengeance" for cheap lulz.



Saw him once escaping through the door after being saved by Meg.

    She unhooked him, later on Meg needed help cause was on the hook, gates were open and he had the chance to rescue her (or at least create some sort of safe diversion), left without thinking twice.

    Stopped watching him.

    Spoiler alert: Survivors aren't meant to work as a team. They're just four people in the same place with the same goals. They are not required to save each other.


    rewatch the video.  

    I was talking about his last point. I have already watched the video.

  • Vietfox
    Vietfox Member Posts: 3,823
    edited September 2018
    @SnakeSound222 said:

    @Vietfox said:
    iceman2kx said:

    I don't care for tru3, or the ######### that pours from his mouth, but he didn't do anything wrong. The survivors were salty little bitches is all

    Just curious why you think that? I've been semi-following him since I started a couple months ago and he seems like a genuinely good dude. He has an "anti-toxic" approach to playing the game and I respect that.

    As far as the video goes. The survivors were just looking for attention because it was a big streamer. They were probably salty because they couldn't bully Tru3 and instead got owned. So they took their petty "vengeance" for cheap lulz.

    Saw him once escaping through the door after being saved by Meg.
    She unhooked him, later on Meg needed help cause was on the hook, gates were open and he had the chance to rescue her (or at least create some sort of safe diversion), left without thinking twice.
    Stopped watching him.

    Spoiler alert: Survivors aren't meant to work as a team. They're just four people in the same place with the same goals. They are not required to save each other.

    Mmm ok let me get this straight.
    I've seen people saying that survivors shouldn't run SC because they shouldn't be self-sufficient and should rely on teammates.
    Now you come over and say "Survivors aren't meant to work as a team. "
    Honestly, you guys get exposed even more every day.
  • Tradebaron
    Tradebaron Member Posts: 135
    Thing is technically everything made by the devs is ok. This includes camping and tunneling despite how many of us try to avoid it. Personally I try to avoid it. However what kills me is when people get upset over perks. Decisive strike or noed, both are fine and you just have to play around it. Regardless they were made to be played sk they'll get played. 
  • FlamingTurd
    FlamingTurd Member Posts: 8

    Tru3 is literally as innocent as it gets here. Shame some people r so salty like this.

  • not_Queen
    not_Queen Member Posts: 1,114

    Same answer as in the other thread about this:

    @not_Queen said:
    Players can report that kind of behavior in-game. The player that is experiencing the problem should be the one reporting the issue, no one else. Our team of ACMs will then review the cases and judge if it warrants a ban or not. Our bans are either temporary (with escalation) or permanent (Gameban) depending on the offense. Note that we will not display the outcome of a report to the public (which is why I am not giving details on this specific case today)

    We ban for Harrassment.
    However, we do not ban for streamsniping, if you feel like you are being harrassed on other platforms (Steam, Twitch, YouTube, PS4, XBOX) you should report to the appropriate service.

This discussion has been closed.