Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.
Access the survey HERE!
What's Your Opinion On A FNaF/Robot Killer?
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?
EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
Comments
-
While I love FnAF, the fandom is the most wretched, vile, disgusting, repulsive, ugly thing I have ever, EVER, seen. I was there before the idiot kids raided it. What a fantastic horror game, all of them. Too bad it’s reputation was ruined by the disgusting children that have had zero parenting.
Apologies, I’ve held that in for a while now.
I don’t think it would work, unless they used a phantom or nightmare animatronic. I do think hearing freddy’s Distorted, slowed laugh would really add to the atmosphere of the game. I’m not sure about this one.
8 -
No thanks. It's an overhyped game with an extremely cringy playerbase and community.
5 -
I had to google FNaF. For anyone else unfamiliar with it, they are talking about Five Nights at Freddy's. It's a silly jump scare game. I can't say I like the idea of Chuck'E Cheese animatronic robot killer in DBD. I don't think robots, ninjas, zombies, aliens, etc really belong. Though I suppose, a zombie isn't too far away from a spirit when you think about it.
4 -
Why tho. U wanna play FNAF then go play that.........0
-
@Dreamnomad said:
I had to google FNaF. For anyone else unfamiliar with it, they are talking about Five Nights at Freddy's. It's a silly jump scare game. I can't say I like the idea of Chuck'E Cheese animatronic robot killer in DBD. I don't think robots, ninjas, zombies, aliens, etc really belong. Though I suppose, a zombie isn't too far away from a spirit when you think about it.Still, you almost got a Ninja Ghost in the last DLC
3 -
@Condorloco_26 said:
@Dreamnomad said:
I had to google FNaF. For anyone else unfamiliar with it, they are talking about Five Nights at Freddy's. It's a silly jump scare game. I can't say I like the idea of Chuck'E Cheese animatronic robot killer in DBD. I don't think robots, ninjas, zombies, aliens, etc really belong. Though I suppose, a zombie isn't too far away from a spirit when you think about it.Still, you almost got a Ninja Ghost in the last DLC
You have a point. Maybe an alien robot next time huh?
0 -
What about The Thing? I think that killer could fit. Or even the Demogorgon. But whatever, the devs are too lazy to work on new animation for a perk, I don't think they would work on creatures animations.Dreamnomad said:I had to google FNaF. For anyone else unfamiliar with it, they are talking about Five Nights at Freddy's. It's a silly jump scare game. I can't say I like the idea of Chuck'E Cheese animatronic robot killer in DBD. I don't think robots, ninjas, zombies, aliens, etc really belong. Though I suppose, a zombie isn't too far away from a spirit when you think about it.
0 -
Which animatronic would they even put in? Freddy was the least scary one in the games (except Night 6/7 in FNAF1). I mean, he's the most iconic, and has the jingle playing when he moves around, but what power would you implement?
1 -
The power of jumpscaring 12 year olds and youtubers who fake-scream everytime he pops up.
No thanks, if you consider that horror then you haven't been on the internet for long.
4 -
No.
2 -
He could move extremely quickly and only if the survivors are looking at him. If the survivors keep eye contact for a total of 10 seconds, he will be randomly spawned elsewhere on the map, with that horrifyingly slow laugh playing.Eninya said:Which animatronic would they even put in? Freddy was the least scary one in the games (except Night 6/7 in FNAF1). I mean, he's the most iconic, and has the jingle playing when he moves around, but what power would you implement?
I feel so bad for Scott, the guy to this day is putting things in the games to drive AWAY that part of the fandom, by making the games more dark and morbid with each entry. He’s literally changing character designs to combat the cringe. And you know what I’m talking about.
Hes a great guy, and what made FNaF great, was the story that left nothing but clues and spawned thousands of theories. It was so interesting and intriguing because you didn’t have answers, only newspaper entries and voicemails to go on as well as rare paranormal happenings.
for me, the horror was what I could find on cameras, to see one of them is no longer where you remember, only to find them 5 rooms over, staring directly into your camera, was incredibly unnerving and made you feel uncomfortable. It was the subtle nature and tension that made me love it.
Its not for everyone, which is why the games are only around $3, because Scott knows and understands what his content is worth, and then gsme isn’t super complex, he has the restraint to not be greedy and nowadays that’s extremely rare and commendable
2 -
Firstly, every and I mean EVERY fandom will have is good and bad side, it's not really in peaks of which is better or worse since I come to the idea that all fandoms are equal in there quality's regardless of what they are based on.DarkWo1f997 said:While I love FnAF, the fandom is the most wretched, vile, disgusting, repulsive, ugly thing I have ever, EVER, seen. I was there before the idiot kids raided it. What a fantastic horror game, all of them. Too bad it’s reputation was ruined by the disgusting children that have had zero parenting.
Apologies, I’ve held that in for a while now.
I don’t think it would work, unless they used a phantom or nightmare animatronic. I do think hearing freddy’s Distorted, slowed laugh would really add to the atmosphere of the game. I’m not sure about this one.
As for the idea of an animatronic killer, would probably be too silly to work in the same game as a pedo old man who was burned alive, or a crazed cannibal but the idea could be possible or just reworked into a different killer0 -
I would say no thank you to both.
0 -
@DarkWo1f997 said:
While I love FnAF, the fandom is the most wretched, vile, disgusting, repulsive, ugly thing I have ever, EVER, seen. I was there before the idiot kids raided it. What a fantastic horror game, all of them. Too bad it’s reputation was ruined by the disgusting children that have had zero parenting.Apologies, I’ve held that in for a while now.
I don’t think it would work, unless they used a phantom or nightmare animatronic. I do think hearing freddy’s Distorted, slowed laugh would really add to the atmosphere of the game. I’m not sure about this one.
I feel the same way tbh. The game are pretty mediocre to decent quality and the lore for a few of the characters could easily tie them into Dead by Daylight. However the fanbase is where most Dead by Daylight players say no. I agree that the fanbase is pretty repulsive at sometimes, but unlike other people, I don't really see why this should be the main reason to say "no". I think the more "cancerous" side of the fandom is starting to fade, as I'm now seeing more general acceptance of the series when brought up in other topics. As for what killer it could be, the only FNaF killer than I feel could work is Springtrap. He's just really the only solid "killer" in the series.
0 -
@se05239 said:
No thanks. It's an overhyped game with an extremely cringy playerbase and community.Alright, this an opinionated debate, so there's no wrong or right answers here.
0 -
@Dreamnomad said:
I had to google FNaF. For anyone else unfamiliar with it, they are talking about Five Nights at Freddy's. It's a silly jump scare game. I can't say I like the idea of Chuck'E Cheese animatronic robot killer in DBD. I don't think robots, ninjas, zombies, aliens, etc really belong. Though I suppose, a zombie isn't too far away from a spirit when you think about it.If robots in DbD seem to be the problem, just pick one of the more human killers of the series. I don't want to get too deep on this topic as this post is about robot killers.
0 -
Too silly for me.
0 -
@Eninya said:
Which animatronic would they even put in? Freddy was the least scary one in the games (except Night 6/7 in FNAF1). I mean, he's the most iconic, and has the jingle playing when he moves around, but what power would you implement?I was thinking Springtrap if anyone. He's the most voted FNaF killer by far and some concept abilities for him have gained support on reddit (which overall seems to be the place where any FNaF ideas get shut down).
0 -
@Boss said:
Too silly for me.I agree that a child's entertainment bear isn't scary whatsoever, so maybe pick a more frightening character, like Springtrap.
0 -
@MhhBurgers said:
The power of jumpscaring 12 year olds and youtubers who fake-scream everytime he pops up.No thanks, if you consider that horror then you haven't been on the internet for long.
Gotta agree on that first part! I don't believe that FNaF is that scary, but it has potential as shown by "The Hug" or other fan films.
0 -
@Orion said:
No.Alrighty
0 -
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@Boss said:
Too silly for me.I agree that a child's entertainment bear isn't scary whatsoever, so maybe pick a more frightening character, like Springtrap.
I'm not saying the devs are right or wrong, but bringing a robot would clash with their rule of every Killer "being human" in some way or at some point.
And these guys LOVE their lore.
One could argue they're actually human cause there's a human soul in them, but i don't think they'd be satisfied with that: It'd still be a robot.
You could put a human soul in a book and call it a new Killer cause it has a human soul.
Though of all characters, Springtrap's not a bad idea, since his actual body is infused with it, though the devs would have to show a lot more skin, flesh and/or bone than he does in FNAF 3 to still show the human part of the character.0 -
@DarkWo1f997 said:
Eninya said:Which animatronic would they even put in? Freddy was the least scary one in the games (except Night 6/7 in FNAF1). I mean, he's the most iconic, and has the jingle playing when he moves around, but what power would you implement?
He could move extremely quickly and only if the survivors are looking at him. If the survivors keep eye contact for a total of 10 seconds, he will be randomly spawned elsewhere on the map, with that horrifyingly slow laugh playing.
I feel so bad for Scott, the guy to this day is putting things in the games to drive AWAY that part of the fandom, by making the games more dark and morbid with each entry. He’s literally changing character designs to combat the cringe. And you know what I’m talking about.
Hes a great guy, and what made FNaF great, was the story that left nothing but clues and spawned thousands of theories. It was so interesting and intriguing because you didn’t have answers, only newspaper entries and voicemails to go on as well as rare paranormal happenings.
for me, the horror was what I could find on cameras, to see one of them is no longer where you remember, only to find them 5 rooms over, staring directly into your camera, was incredibly unnerving and made you feel uncomfortable. It was the subtle nature and tension that made me love it.
Its not for everyone, which is why the games are only around $3, because Scott knows and understands what his content is worth, and then gsme isn’t super complex, he has the restraint to not be greedy and nowadays that’s extremely rare and commendable
Not a single point I don't disagree with (well about the Scott thing). Scott knows that his games aren't that complex, which is why he charges little value for any of them. He hasn't made a FNaF game that is 10 (or more) dollars. I feel bad for Scott mainly just because of the hate that the games have gotten. He even said himself, "don't make the mistake of coming down on the fanbase as a whole".
0 -
@Boss said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@Boss said:
Too silly for me.I agree that a child's entertainment bear isn't scary whatsoever, so maybe pick a more frightening character, like Springtrap.
I'm not saying the devs are right or wrong, but bringing a robot would clash with their rule of every Killer "being human" in some way or at some point.
And these guys LOVE their lore.
One could argue they're actually human cause there's a human soul in them, but i don't think they'd be satisfied with that: It'd still be a robot.
You could put a human soul in a book and call it a new Killer cause it has a human soul.
Though of all characters, Springtrap's not a bad idea, since his actual body is infused with it, though the devs would have to show a lot more skin, flesh and/or bone than he does in FNAF 3 to still show the human part of the character.100% agreed
0 -
@UberMorpth said:
DarkWo1f997 said:While I love FnAF, the fandom is the most wretched, vile, disgusting, repulsive, ugly thing I have ever, EVER, seen. I was there before the idiot kids raided it. What a fantastic horror game, all of them. Too bad it’s reputation was ruined by the disgusting children that have had zero parenting.
Apologies, I’ve held that in for a while now.
I don’t think it would work, unless they used a phantom or nightmare animatronic. I do think hearing freddy’s Distorted, slowed laugh would really add to the atmosphere of the game. I’m not sure about this one.
Firstly, every and I mean EVERY fandom will have is good and bad side, it's not really in peaks of which is better or worse since I come to the idea that all fandoms are equal in there quality's regardless of what they are based on.
As for the idea of an animatronic killer, would probably be too silly to work in the same game as a pedo old man who was burned alive, or a crazed cannibal but the idea could be possible or just reworked into a different killer
What about an insane man who murdered a dozen innocent children, then proceeded to protect himself by hiding in a rusted suit. Later, surviving an entire building combust into flames. Finally, being killed in a second fire to go into an eternal purgatory where he is tortured by his victims? THAT'S, a fnaf killer that isn't too silly for ya.
0 -
@Boss said:
Too silly for me.It's a pretty grim story behind the series, but there's no denying that Scott Cawthon didn't write/tell it well, and expanded over time and needed to retcon stuff. That damaged its presentation when looking at it more than the creepy surface of it all.
On the flip side, the animatronics were always terribly creepy. Just playing FNAF1 still makes my spine crawl when viewing the stage and all of the animatronics are suddenly looking back at you.
0 -
@Dreamnomad said:
@Condorloco_26 said:
@Dreamnomad said:
I had to google FNaF. For anyone else unfamiliar with it, they are talking about Five Nights at Freddy's. It's a silly jump scare game. I can't say I like the idea of Chuck'E Cheese animatronic robot killer in DBD. I don't think robots, ninjas, zombies, aliens, etc really belong. Though I suppose, a zombie isn't too far away from a spirit when you think about it.Still, you almost got a Ninja Ghost in the last DLC
You have a point. Maybe an alien robot next time huh?
Xenomorph from Alien series is actually considered an iconic horror monster.
0 -
well i mean, if they were to make a fnaf chapter, they would atleast use a character which is so important to the lore, springtrap as the killer and michael afton as the survivor, easy as that
0 -
@Eninya said:
@Boss said:
Too silly for me.It's a pretty grim story behind the series, but there's no denying that Scott Cawthon didn't write/tell it well, and expanded over time and needed to retcon stuff. That damaged its presentation when looking at it more than the creepy surface of it all.
On the flip side, the animatronics were always terribly creepy. Just playing FNAF1 still makes my spine crawl when viewing the stage and all of the animatronics are suddenly looking back at you.
I wrote "for me" for a reason.
What frightens you doesn't necessarily frighten me.
I'm not denying you your opinion though, don't worry. Just saying i don't think any character would fit as a Killer besides maybe Springtrap since he has the biggest killer in the FNAF franchise literally within him physically.0 -
We would need one of the creepiest characters from the series though Springtrap would work pretty good with the lore especially the part where hes stuck in an eternal purgatory but I feel they would have to change his aesthetics a bit. What would the weapon be as well? Would his power be to put a freddy mask that cannot be removed and if the survivors do too much motion while not in a chase they die therefore slowing the game down better than the pig?Not sure how I would feel about it but hey anything can happen.0
-
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
1 -
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;P0 -
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
0 -
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
0 -
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
Yes. And every sane player thinks like that. Too bad most of the survivor mains don't think like that and start moaning when a strong killer is introduced into the game.
0 -
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
Yes. And every sane player thinks like that. Too bad most of the survivor mains don't think like that and start moaning when a strong killer is introduced into the game.
I can see where your coming from. Strong killers are a touchy subject among survivors (for obvious reasons), but most survivors should HOPEFULLY agree that 1 survivor should be weaker than the killer. If they don't agree to that, then they have no right to help balance this game.
0 -
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
Yes. And every sane player thinks like that. Too bad most of the survivor mains don't think like that and start moaning when a strong killer is introduced into the game.
I can see where your coming from. Strong killers are a touchy subject among survivors (for obvious reasons), but most survivors should HOPEFULLY agree that 1 survivor should be weaker than the killer. If they don't agree to that, then they have no right to help balance this game.
There's an idea going around for a while now that DS should just stun the Killer, but not free you from their grip.
While the Killer's stunned, they wouldn't be able to walk or move their camera, and they'd be susceptible to being blinded while in this animation, successfully freeing the grabbed Survivor.
It could also be used to stop the Killer at a pallet, so an other Survivor has enough time to pull it down.While i'm uncertain if this idea would be "the ideal solution to make literally everyone happy", my point is that, what it would do, is reinforce the idea that you'd need some help to overcome the Killer's advantages over you.
0 -
when i see ANY of the FNaF characters running around in the fog, i will f*cking uninstall!
but seriously, no. FNaF should never be in this game.
any other form of killer robot could be interesting... maybe. depends on the idea.
0 -
@Boss said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
Yes. And every sane player thinks like that. Too bad most of the survivor mains don't think like that and start moaning when a strong killer is introduced into the game.
I can see where your coming from. Strong killers are a touchy subject among survivors (for obvious reasons), but most survivors should HOPEFULLY agree that 1 survivor should be weaker than the killer. If they don't agree to that, then they have no right to help balance this game.
There's an idea going around for a while now that DS should just stun the Killer, but not free you from their grip.
While the Killer's stunned, they wouldn't be able to walk or move their camera, and they'd be susceptible to being blinded while in this animation, successfully freeing the grabbed Survivor.
It could also be used to stop the Killer at a pallet, so an other Survivor has enough time to pull it down.While i'm uncertain if this idea would be "the ideal solution to make literally everyone happy", my point is that, what it would do, is reinforce the idea that you'd need some help to overcome the Killer's advantages over you.
Is there still an obsession mechanic to this? If so, what would be the difference between using as the obsession vs. using it as not as obsession?
0 -
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@Boss said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
Yes. And every sane player thinks like that. Too bad most of the survivor mains don't think like that and start moaning when a strong killer is introduced into the game.
I can see where your coming from. Strong killers are a touchy subject among survivors (for obvious reasons), but most survivors should HOPEFULLY agree that 1 survivor should be weaker than the killer. If they don't agree to that, then they have no right to help balance this game.
There's an idea going around for a while now that DS should just stun the Killer, but not free you from their grip.
While the Killer's stunned, they wouldn't be able to walk or move their camera, and they'd be susceptible to being blinded while in this animation, successfully freeing the grabbed Survivor.
It could also be used to stop the Killer at a pallet, so an other Survivor has enough time to pull it down.While i'm uncertain if this idea would be "the ideal solution to make literally everyone happy", my point is that, what it would do, is reinforce the idea that you'd need some help to overcome the Killer's advantages over you.
Is there still an obsession mechanic to this? If so, what would be the difference between using as the obsession vs. using it as not as obsession?
Longer stun time for Obsessions i'd wager, to give Flashlight people more time.
0 -
@Boss said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@Boss said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
Yes. And every sane player thinks like that. Too bad most of the survivor mains don't think like that and start moaning when a strong killer is introduced into the game.
I can see where your coming from. Strong killers are a touchy subject among survivors (for obvious reasons), but most survivors should HOPEFULLY agree that 1 survivor should be weaker than the killer. If they don't agree to that, then they have no right to help balance this game.
There's an idea going around for a while now that DS should just stun the Killer, but not free you from their grip.
While the Killer's stunned, they wouldn't be able to walk or move their camera, and they'd be susceptible to being blinded while in this animation, successfully freeing the grabbed Survivor.
It could also be used to stop the Killer at a pallet, so an other Survivor has enough time to pull it down.While i'm uncertain if this idea would be "the ideal solution to make literally everyone happy", my point is that, what it would do, is reinforce the idea that you'd need some help to overcome the Killer's advantages over you.
Is there still an obsession mechanic to this? If so, what would be the difference between using as the obsession vs. using it as not as obsession?
Longer stun time for Obsessions i'd wager, to give Flashlight people more time.
They tried that and concluded it'd make SWF even more powerful.
Am I the only one who doesn't find FNaF funny or scary? TBH the robots look like something out of a child's drawing, just "creepy" dolls with big teeth.
0 -
@Orion said:
@Boss said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@Boss said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@Boss said:
@NextKillerSpongebob said:
@TheEliteTurtle said:
What's your opinion of a FNaF/Robot killer?EDIT: It doesn't have to be FNaF, I just put that there because it seemed like they would group in with the "robot" category.
No. Don't even start talking or mentioning FnaF. Robot killers would be impossible to balance since robots are basically better humans and they should be twice as good as a survivor...now imagine a thing like that being boosted by the entity
I mean, twice as good as a Survivor means it'd be as good as 2 Survivors.
Shouldn't a Killer always be better in at least a 1v1? ;PBut are they? Nope xD That's why every survivor would cry and make the community even more split and cancerous.
But they should be, and a Killer representing what should be would be a great start.
Yes. And every sane player thinks like that. Too bad most of the survivor mains don't think like that and start moaning when a strong killer is introduced into the game.
I can see where your coming from. Strong killers are a touchy subject among survivors (for obvious reasons), but most survivors should HOPEFULLY agree that 1 survivor should be weaker than the killer. If they don't agree to that, then they have no right to help balance this game.
There's an idea going around for a while now that DS should just stun the Killer, but not free you from their grip.
While the Killer's stunned, they wouldn't be able to walk or move their camera, and they'd be susceptible to being blinded while in this animation, successfully freeing the grabbed Survivor.
It could also be used to stop the Killer at a pallet, so an other Survivor has enough time to pull it down.While i'm uncertain if this idea would be "the ideal solution to make literally everyone happy", my point is that, what it would do, is reinforce the idea that you'd need some help to overcome the Killer's advantages over you.
Is there still an obsession mechanic to this? If so, what would be the difference between using as the obsession vs. using it as not as obsession?
Longer stun time for Obsessions i'd wager, to give Flashlight people more time.
They tried that and concluded it'd make SWF even more powerful.
Am I the only one who doesn't find FNaF funny or scary? TBH the robots look like something out of a child's drawing, just "creepy" dolls with big teeth.
I don't find FNAF funny or scary.
JUMPscary at most.
0
