We have temporarily disabled The Houndmaster (Bone Chill Event queue) and Baermar Uraz's Ugly Sweater Cosmetic (all queues) due to issues affecting gameplay.

Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
The Dead by Daylight team would like your feedback in a Player Satisfaction survey.

We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.

Access the survey HERE!

The lack of interaction you get with killer these days cause of the current strats and metas...

Axe
Axe Member Posts: 1,060

....make me wish I got tunneled 24/7 (aka the killer chases me non-stop)


But things has changed over the past years, every killer including me I guess have switched to new form of "hit n run" tatics. It gets boring playing survivor after a while, most of the games I will do gens cause the second I pallet stun a killer or vault to a strong loop like killershack or jungel gym the killer will yeet across the map and never even try to touch me again until end game when they dont really have a choice but to chase a survivor for hooks and points.


Most of my chases barley last more than 30 seconds before the killer decided they dont wanna deal with me anymore. But I can't honestly blame them, the game in its current state is not exactly balanced around 1v1 chases and the killer got not 1 but 4 survivors to deal with and I get the idea of focusing on the weak links first as they will probably waste more pallets, lose mind games and overall chases much faster. 




I know this is a pretty odd thing to rant about but the game as a survivor is just getting boring the more you play and I wish we had more interactions and objectives. 

Comments

  • ALostPuppy
    ALostPuppy Member Posts: 3,398

    The longer you make objectives, the even longer amount of time 3 other survivors are gonna be sat around holding 1 button and getting even more bored than they already are. It's definitely a balancing nightmare that BHVR have obviously tried really hard to make work, I don't think making objectives any longer or shorter is the way to go about it.

  • valvarez4
    valvarez4 Member Posts: 868

    That’’s only because most killers think that win is 4k. If the average kills were 2k and you do 4k 1 of 10 games this Will be a better game and less toxic and stressful

  • UseTheValve
    UseTheValve Member Posts: 350

    And that's why we got to play nurse, so we can just down you in 15 seconds.

  • Axe
    Axe Member Posts: 1,060
    edited November 2020

    I Main Nurse for such a long time now I know pretty much every trick in the book. I have gone against Legacy Nurses with 4-5K hours but even then I could last long in a chase. Nurse should in theory down any survivor within 10 seconds cause of how broken how her power is in 1v1 chases but thats almost not the case

  • valvarez4
    valvarez4 Member Posts: 868
    edited November 2020

    Sorry, but they”re not killers . They”re people trying to have fun. I”m a surv main with 3.000 hours and I never escape if the killer play fair.

  • valvarez4
    valvarez4 Member Posts: 868

    so Many selfish killers can”t understand it, I know

  • MrSmashem
    MrSmashem Member Posts: 161

    The Killers entire objective revolves around stopping Gens so that they can contain the Survivors and eventually kill them. If the game averages 2 kills and 2 escapes, you basically want the Killer to fail their primary objective, on average.


    Sorry dude, Survivors shouldn't get free escapes, those should be earned. In the same way, Killers shouldnt get free kills, those should be earned, as well. A game thats balanced around one side essentially failing an objective, and the other pretty much guaranteeing they succeed unless they really suck, is horrible balance. Killers will always feel cheated and Survivor wont be nearly as satisfying.


    And I can say with pretty much 100% certainty, as someone who plays both sides, I wouldnt be playing either if the game turned in to that.

  • WestX
    WestX Member Posts: 120

    I think a 4k is considered a win because all of the adept Challenges for killers necessitate a 4k while the Survivors only require them to escape. Clearly this is designed around a 4k and Escaping being "win conditions".

  • NekoTorvic
    NekoTorvic Member Posts: 778

    This is literally what I think every time see a post about tunneling and especially about camping or slugging.... The game does not reward killers for going on fair chases. Every second you're in a chase you're falling behind cuz the other 3 survivors are just holding m1 on the other side of the map far away from any danger...

    I honestly don't think that gens should take longer to complete. That would be boring for survivors. But they need to be more interactive and less safe, so they actually feel like they're constantly under threat, and most definitely they should require more skill and commitment than holding a single button and occasionally getting a "are you awake" check.

    It's unfortunate but I try to believe the devs do the best they can...lets remember at some point in the distant past they did mention they were working on something similar to End Game Collapse but for early game...I would hope that is still a thing and I'd hope that solves the issue of matches going to quick for killers to want to bother with chases.

  • mike1288mccarthy
    mike1288mccarthy Member Posts: 78

    Well if I'm playing killer and I know it's a strong survivor loop or an infinite like cow tree I will give up on them because I know I'll never catch them even with bloodlust 3. Sometimes it's a strategic move to give up early in the chase if you know they can loop you for days

  • Withered8
    Withered8 Member Posts: 1,241

    Look I mostly agree with this, the problem is some killers really skew this data (along with maps) becusse they are able to play incredibly fairly and have fun chases with easy, like blight, Freddy, nurse, spirit, huntress, cause they have more than enough pressure to be able to do this. This then makes for really unfun games and stomp fests when these killers start playing less fair or as you would with maybe a weaker killer. You see the problem?

    The balance has always been hard to strike. If they made gen speeds or objectives longer or so that every killer could have fun and fair chases, what happens to these strong killers? They’ll just dominate. And what happens when killers start playing less fair then? They won’t even need to think and I’ll just dominate.

    I would be onboard for this change, especially as someone who strives to do this when I play killer, but there would have to be far harsher punishments for killers who play less fun and scummy or ways for survivors to more easily deal with these tactics.

  • C3Tooth
    C3Tooth Member Posts: 8,266

    @Withered8 eventhough you can say the game is Survivor side, but its still Killer's decide how the game is going to be (as camping/tunneling or not).

    The hook system have to be reworked, like Pyramid head's cage, the camping will be gone. And there should be a requirement like all 4 Survivors should get their 1st hook before Killer can last hook someone, to remove tunneling.

    After those 2 fixed. We will see the true power of Killer, when they're force to play more fair. From there, Devs can nerf Survivors by adding more Objectives.

  • Withered8
    Withered8 Member Posts: 1,241

    Agree I think they should have done this anyways but I imagine it’s something they will consider in the near future.

  • Taingaran
    Taingaran Member Posts: 288

    Also, the killer is given 2500 bp if all survivors are killed in the match. A survivor receives 5000 bp, if surv escaped.

  • Withered8
    Withered8 Member Posts: 1,241

    Because the aim of the game isn't really to kill survivors as much as it is to get hookes and feed the entities ambitions.