Bloodpoint System is Unfair for Killers

I don't play survivor hardly at all, and just by watching shrines I have my level 50 dwight with every meta perk I could want. The only reason I have for leveling another character is for the alternative skin, or possibly the small benefit of Ace being incredibly quiet by default.

The grind of going through an entire bloodweb to get each killer up to snuff is intense. I suppose it's nice to have my dwight more or less already finished which means I never really need to level another survivor. I have a lot of work left for some of my killers tho.

As a killer its totally possible. Let's say you get 27.000 BP, with 4 stacks of bbq it's now 54.000bp, let's say you gave a survivor pudding..... You're now getting 81.000 BP.

It's really not that uncommon

The grind is insane. One of the reasons i dont recommend this game often.

But the grind is only worse for killer bc you have the luxury to play different characters. When you play with only one killer, you get the same amount of content a survivor can get in this game.

Almost like survivors are just skins and don't have unique powers. Killers do so it makes since that you have to grind to get specific builds on specific killers that work well. Insisting that this is not fair is bonkers. Completely dumb.

If anything the grind is not as fair for survivor since their version of bbq requires them to compete with other survivors while the killer gets bbq tokens through normal gameplay.

Such an entitled and impatient generation.

I think that says everything.

Uh actually this is a fair point I haven't really thought about too often. Although you do get alot more bp as killer in my experience but your point is still valid.

How fallacious, I will still take on the point however.

Because it would be considered immoral to treat someone unfairly, with morality being defined as the actions that conclude in the wellness of life. Therefore, its backwards. You do not have the right to treat someone unfairly logically, as that would be harmful and therefore immoral.

We would have to define Fair as well, if you mean a widely accepted variation being "in accordance with the rules or standards; legitimate.", then it is of upmost importance then we treat everyone fairly as long as those rules do not also promote harm. This is why we have laws, and in this sense then the aforementioned applies duly.

If it is to mean the widely accepted variation being "without cheating or trying to achieve unjust advantage." it is not as equally relevant however profoundly needed the same. Most could find cheating immoral by its very nature.

if it is to mean fair as equal which would mean in popular conversation "a person or thing considered to be the same as another in status or quality." , and if we conclude we are talking about people such in this case then we can clearly state that you should be obligated to treat someone equally and fair in accordance to reason.

So in this context treating a stranger like a stranger, and therefore with distance, and a loved one with passion is fair. Therefore logically it would seem to treat someone unfairly would be immoral, illogical and would ultimately hurt the person in the long run. This is why naturally humans considerations for fair and to be reasonable are found as these traits promote community's helping each other which in turn increases either/both survivability and/or convenience.

IE: If someone has car issues and no one thought of the outcome to help the person then its not only unlikely other people will be helped, but even yourself you will find help unable to be found for your car when it breaks down or for whatever issue you have that typically people will have a chance to help you out otherwise.

This is the most logical retort I can come up with currently, and I do think I did well.

?

I actually laughed when I read this because you just assumed a bunch of things for seemly no reason. I will go ahead and answer these questions anyway though. Personally considering I am 18 and just graduated I personally can give some amount to the homeless whenever I can but not often because I don't have a main source of income yet as I just graduated so alot of what you said couldn't even apply to me if you wanted it too, another reason not to assume things.

However with that being said, my mom is naturally altruistic and I have witness countless times when the homeless would ask for a couple dollars for food and every time she has failed not to directly go to the nearby food stores and give them the food directly. The reason she doesn't directly give them the money and instead gives them the food is because they are strangers and does not know them she wants to make sure the money is spend on food if you get my drift. Which is exactly why she decided to choose the career choice as a nurse.

As for myself, I am already applying to help out my moms hospital for charity work just to help people, as I don't have much to do until college is in and therefore find myself thinking "Well why not do something productive while helping people?". Hard to justify a cause on why not too.

This is all of course natural altruism for no real reason other than I am human, and therefore have a sense of humanity. About a month ago when we were driving into my grandmas town, my mom didn't pay attention and ran out of gas. As direct evidence of humans naturally helping each other from personal experience a lady pulled over and offered to help us. This is actually why I gave the specific example I did, because it was the easiest one that I can correlate to my reality.

Ironically this is not even true, as it entirely subjective as everyone has a different walk of life. For example, a rich person at birth will have life easier in the monetary sense, but this says nothing of anything else. As another example, clearly your upbringing was a unfortunate one, and I am sorry to whoever has lied to you or did something to make you think that your mindset is the default mindset that most people have. I think you should see if you have depression as it would seem it but I will digress. You should work on your views of other people as your naturally or ill inflicted mindset will have you miss out on opportunities in life.

Another silly accusation to implicate something I have never said. I am not a savior of anyone, never did I claim to be. Nor are those the facts for most other people that I have ever met but your pessimistic mindset holds you back from realizing that. Not to say there aren't terrible people out there, there are but it is not in they're best interest nor others best interest to be terrible to one another. There is a reason why corrupt dictators eventually fall, few people cry, but most everyone rejoices. There are reasons why something such as racism was generally accepted but in time it was left behind by the majority of people, ect.

Sure, some people do scam other people out of stuff by pretending to be X in turn to obtain things. There are many reason for why, but the thing is I would rather happen to give 10 "homeless" people money, if it means I can help at least one actually homeless person. Your blatant disregard for life, more specifically humans and your assumptions about humans in general tells me your are either in a really dark time, or are quite immoral, either way its not my issue to fix, that's your issue to fix.

Well considering you don't understand why fairness logically is obligated to degrees, it is no surprise to me you are the type of person to make a fallacious red herring, even with that said however my points still stand, and ignoring them doesn't do much.

How can the survivors "get so easly all perks"? You have to grind just as much, even more actually since there are more survivors. There is no difference in unlocking perks between killers and survivors.

In fact, killers earn more bloodpoints on average than survivors.

Let’s not forget the multitude of addons which pollute blood webs for survivors. Bringing up your comparison of nurses to bt is illogical. Survivor perks in general work on every survivor since they don’t have the special ability killers have. Perks that work well with one power may not work well with another and that’s just too bad.

Unless the message is to give survivors special abilities to make the grind somewhat fairer since the scenario in which levels are gained is comparable.

Bruh it took me 3 whole months to get all the perks on feng maxed out and 2 more to prestige her It's unfair for both sides tbh

Meanwhile Killers get more BPs by default, have an easier way to get Bonus BPs and have way less Junk in their Bloodwebs (aka are more likely to get their good stuff to use more often).

Yeah, totally unfair.

Like others have said there isn't a fairness issue in this. If you are choosing to play every individual killer to get their perks instead of play one killer and just feed the bloodpoints to another for their perks, that's on you. Getting the perks for killer is just as easy as getting it for survivor, it just takes time and for games not to be over in .5 seconds.