iMpRoVeD mAtChMaKiNg

Chance of a swf is high, it's only a single red rank, all the others you are designed to match with. You MATCH WITHIN 7ranks, so it's only the one player out of place and that's like due to swf

Regarding what i said about SBMM and how players should use variety to counter that in CoD i think the same applies to DbD if MMR ever gets ready and implemented. We all see streamers who most of the time do Variety over sticking to just 1 side or just 1 build not just because the content but because sticking to just 1 thing is harmfull for their enjoyment of the game, even those that do stick to 1 side more still use variety within that side.

One of the biggest examples of both sides of this Variety argument is Otzdarva's 50 win streak for each killer. By trying to get 50 wins with each killer he is setting himself up for harder matches the longer each killers streak goes if MMR was on, why? Because he is being successful with a certain set up frequently wich the game has to interpret as a high skill level wich then would make matches increasingly more difficult in opponents skill and also in their prefered way of playing until Otz loses to alleviate the system because if Otz beats everyone the system puts in his path then eventually the system runs out of people to match up to his ever higer skill level. However MMR is not in DbD so what happens in Otz streaks is that he is facing a variety survivors with a variety of builds wich creates randomness for him to face and that randomness is the Challenge itself, can Otz create a set up that allows him to be somewhat consistant with that killer? A setup that covers the killer's weakness or enhances their capacity to allow for consistency.

Throughout this process we've seen Otz accomplish wins we'd say were impossible, we've seen him lose streaks in matches that maybe we thought were controlled and all of those moments are created by player input, his input and survivors input, Survivors input is the biggest part of every match, how well survivors do is based on their input and how well killer does is also based in a large portion to survivor input, as good of a killer as Otz is there will be survivors who can match up to him and create difficult scenarios for Otz (he has this cowshed 1v1 video aswell that illustrates some of what i'm saying) while the other survivors are free progress the game, 1 good survivor or 1 bad survivor makes alot of difference in the game. 1 good play or 1 bad play makes alot of difference in the game, 1 good survivor play benefits all survivors independently of skill level, it's then up to the other survivors to capitalize on that good play, the same for a survivor bad play, it impacts the whole team, this is why Survivors complain about SoloQ and why SWF is so strong, an SWF can transform a bad play to minimalize momentum for the killer and SoloQ survivors are left wondering what happened and what to do next frequently. Otz can make a good play but have that play be denied or see it's merit diminished by the survivor he is chasing because that survivor can also make a good play by antecipating Otz or denied by the team as a whole (for example the team finishing the last gen and activating the chased survivor's Adrenaline, giving them a health state and speed boost wich nulifies Otz's chase), in SWF or SoloQ scenarios this can happen, so Otz's input as killer in each situation has a smaller effect than Survivor's input, Otz needs multiple good input's to create momentum but because every singular killer input is less meaningful than a survivor input the killer experience is always harder and changing, a good killer play might not end up doing anything because Survivors reacted accordingly wich leads to bad killer play being punished harder than a survivor bad play.

So with this we prove inputs by both sides have different weights wich is unbalanced since this is a 4v1 game, there's always 3 bystanders who can take advantage of any given scenario for the team as a whole or themselves as individuals. THIS IS WHY DBD IS BROKEN, killer input is meaningless in the big picture, Survivors dictate how a match progresses.

Then on top of this difference in input importance is the fact that survivors and Killers have different win conditions and objectives. The objective for survivors is escape, the way they do that is by doing gens and open the exit gate and leaving but that task can fall to any of the 4 at any given time and they can help each other all the time by either grouping up or tackling the objective on multiple fronts. Killers objective is to capture and hook survivors as a sacrifice to the Entity. The problem is Survivors can input into their objective 4x fast than killer can input into theirs while each killer input is less meaningful as discussed above. Not only is this an already gigantic issue it's also made worse by the fact that catching any survivor has a minimal effect since each survivor has for all intents and purposes 3 lifes since they need to be hooked 3 times in order for Killer to achieve their objectives. So it takes too long for killers to achieve progress on their own compared to survivors. It's a numbers game and the Numbers spell Disaster for Killer.