Visit the Kill Switch Master List for more information on these and other current known issues: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/299-kill-switch-master-list
We encourage you to be as honest as possible in letting us know how you feel about the game. The information and answers provided are anonymous, not shared with any third-party, and will not be used for purposes other than survey analysis.
Access the survey HERE!
Simple Question - Yes or No - Do you think NOED is fine?
Comments
-
Yes
0 -
Negative.
1 -
yes
0 -
Yes - but I refuse to use it because it feels super scummy.
0 -
I feel like I'm the only one who doesn't notice a difference with the speed movement.
0 -
No.
Just give your answer and leave if u read this.
0 -
Yes.
0 -
No
0 -
Yes
0 -
Nope. Under no circumstances should a player be rewarded for failing his/her objective.
2 -
In power, yes. In usage and enjoyment, no. Too many bad killers use it as a crutch to down and camp survivors to death after getting destroyed in the rest of the game.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
Byeah
0 -
No.
1 -
Yes why are you now getting mad that you have to do totems when you had all game.
1 -
You hardly even get a haste term, though.
0 -
Absolutely, undoubtedly, undeniably, yes.
1 -
No.
1 -
that wasn't a simple yes or no
1 -
No.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
Indeed.
0 -
yes, depending on circumstances of course
0 -
Yes
0 -
I agree about the speed bonus. It's a yes for me without it. But an I don't know with the speed bonus.
0 -
Yes, it is absolutely fine, as it has lots of counters.
0 -
Yes and no, mostly leaning on no, there are times where a killer can get a 4k just with this perk but that's not that common, i just wish it didn't have that speed boost
1 -
Yesnt.
1 -
Yes
0 -
No, but many things aren't fine in DBD so it's just a grain of sand on the beach.
0 -
No
1 -
Nope.
1 -
No.
I think the speed boost should be removed and I think the perk should notify the survivor before someone is downed.
Additionally I think it needs a prerequisite is needed. Every survivor should be hooked once throughout the match before it activates.
1 -
Not at all.
1 -
Noed hurts mostly solo Q, doesn’t mean they’re bad survivors.
If you only get kills because you relied on noed, it does make a mediocre killer though.
1 -
In solo Q, no.
In swf, yes.
1 -
Yes
0 -
yup
0 -
Nope.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
No.
I love how split the responses have been so far.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
In concept? Yes.
In practice? Ehh... I'd say no. It could be completely fine with some very simple changes like a totem counter (like others have mentioned).
I also feel like if there were a Survivor totem that gave all Survivors an extra free health state or somehow hindered Killers as steeply as an insta-down does Survivors that the old chant of "Get gud, do bones" would be silenced.
2 -
Yes. And I know you said no reasoning necessary but the simple reason it's fine is because it can be countered before it even activates.
0 -
Nope 😀
1 -
Yes. Its fine, if it isnt then BHVR will mend it eventually.
0 -
Noed is okay.
0 -
Yes.
Killer played with 3 perks all game against 16. It's an issue for survivors because they refuse to just leave or finish the bones they walked past the whole game.
1 -
Yes.
0 -
Lots of mixed responses here.
I just want to add my two little grains of useless salt.
I do think NOED as a perk is bad for the overall game health, but with how it can easily be handled by one of several different perks on one survivor, I do think it's fine.
As long as there's a reasonable method of countering it (before it even spawns), it is fine. But no, I don't think it's good for game health.
0
