General Discussions
General Discussions
Definitive proof over which side is more toxic.
Scott Jund released a video a while ago talking about which side is more toxic. And here is the definitive proof that survivors are more toxic.
When you encounter a hacker, how often is it a killer vs it a survivor? In my 1.8k hours of playing, i have encountered a killer hacker, exactly once. Survivor hackers? Probably dozens times at this point. I encounter about 1 every couple of weeks.
Checkmake.
EDIT: since apparently it is missed. This post is called a joke.
Comments
-
You never know, maybe killer mains are just smart enough not to telegraph how much they are cheating.
6 -
This isn't a Survivor vs Killer debate.
There are only people who try to ruin other people's experiences and people who play the game normally.
That's it, no wiggle room, end of discussion.
18 -
sigh
you encounter 4 times more Survivors than Killers if you play both sides equally, therefore your chance at finding a hacker on the Survivor side is 4 times higher than finding a hacker on the Killer side.
plus, Survivor is clearly the most popular role people want to play, so due to there being more players involved, there is also going to be a higher percentage of toxic people / hackers - that doesnt mean the percentage of those people would be greater than on the Killer side.
additionally, this is entirely based on your personal experience, which doesnt prove anything.
4 -
I hear way more about killers hacking with 2 killer matches, Ghostface throwing hatchets, wall hacks, etc. I've had multiple killers that are playing normal but as we get to 1 gen all of a sudden they just start swiping the air and survivors are getting hit/downed no where near them. I had a Bubba that didn't need to rev his chainsaw at all, he went from chainsaw down to instantly swinging it and then was moving around the map faster than I've ever seen a Bubba move yet wasn't running anything to increase his speed.
Both sides have cheaters. Both sides are equally toxic in their own ways.
2 -
Way to divide the community further by demonizing one side as hackers only.
2 -
Lol why is it a competition on which side is more toxic 😂
5 -
I guess comedy and sarcasm is missed on these forums.
1 -
You never can prove killers are hacking. They come straight to you for no reason? They got lucky or was skilled is the answer I always get.
2 -
Hacking has nothing to do with which side is more toxic.
Does it even matter if one side is more toxic than the other, it's DBD, it's just part of the game.
0 -
B-b-b-but I can't feel vindicated in my preferred role of choice if I can't prove that the other side is genetically predisposed towards evil.
:C
2 -
I've encountered 3 killers hackers and 1 survivor hacker. 4.1k hours. Hackers don't have a side, the same people who hack as killer are the same doing it as survivor. It's not a survivor vs killer argument. It's us vs hackers.
2 -
survivors are definitely more prone to exploiting and being toxic because it makes them feel good, I encountered so many no mither jakes who able to infinite dead hard, unable to be grabbed or dropped. I never seen a cheating killer in my 5.2k hours of playing both sides. Only thing can say about killer is that one obvious YouTube video of a flying ghostface that throw hatchets but that’s years old lol
0 -
I don’t know if I’ve met any killer hackers. If they were, they were subtle about it.
I have to say my favorite blatant hack I’ve witnessed is a jake summoning the entity as if someone was sacrificed. Just random call downs that I don’t think affected anything other than messing with sounds.
1 -
Two killer matches is a bug actually
0 -
lol this community is so bad now its trying to put hacking on one side . If we can use these kind of anecdotal evidence then killers are more toxic because they are the one streaming themselves hacking.
3 -
Tou can prove of a killer is hacking a billy who trow hatchet should be a good start
0 -
I mean, killers just need to use a VPN to get a ridiculous advantage, and while not hacking, it is cheating. And it's incredibly common.
1 -
Great. Totally need more of these. /s
0 -
Okay I am commenting after the edit making the goal of the post clear.
For your information, the written word without any form of body language or intonation is a really bad way to convey sarcasm or irony without any visual aid ( "/s" for example).
And second, as a rather frequent member of the forum you should maybe know better that there are enough people on here that post stuff of this level of crazy bias nearly on a daily basis while also meaning it.
Lastly not nearly everybody knows you from other posts to get that this is so different that it has to be meant in a different way.
3 -
Writin sarcasme can work
Just look at what an marvalous undeniably excellent job the op did. They truelly blessed us with their knee slapping humor. We should feel honored to have a comedic mastermind here on the forums.
See
2 -
When will you ppl start using own brain instead blindly following streamers? This isn't debate there's only ppl who wants to act toxic and that's it and obviously there's 4 survivors and 1 killer ofc it's more possible you'll get toxic survivor Sherlock
0 -
To be fair the humour didn't translate at all over text lol it's too similar to legit things people say here
1
