The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

I do feel for survivor issues

I will say that my thinking on this game's balance is usually killer-centric, because it's the more fun role (ideally) to me, and I play it a lot. I think the role has a heck of a lot of issues that have needed addressing for years, and it hasn't happened yet. If you were to ask me if the game was survivor sided, my answer would always be yes. But that doesn't mean survivors don't have their own problems. It's unfair for the killer to make a few mistakes, because they're only human, and lose the game by a landslide. But it's also unfair for a survivor to get killed guaranteed if the killer chooses, simply because of which killer they were, off of getting downed a single time. It's unfair that they can't really avoid getting tunneled if nobody has BT or DS. It's unfair that they get teammates that are so far below their skill level consistently in solo queue. I play survivor too, so I know these things. I don't know how we're gonna go about it, but I'm hoping some time in the future, both sides' problems will be solved, and not just one or the other's. Not everyone likes to play both sides, but if you do, you will have a far better grasp on game balance, and the general appeal of each role.

«1

Comments

  • humanbeing1704
    humanbeing1704 Member Posts: 8,999
    edited April 2022

    mmr has definitely made survivor absolutely abysmal and has shown the flaws of solo queue much more hence on your point about the tunnelling

  • Thusly_Boned
    Thusly_Boned Member Posts: 2,957

    Yes.

    And not just a little of "the other side", something approaching an even split of hours in surv/killer. Too many people just identify full on with their main role, and have no clue about the other.

    And I get that it is harder to learn two sets of mechanics, and time consuming, which is a big reason why so many people only play one or the other. But I think it's necessary to really have a remotely informed opinion about game balance. You can always tell the people who say they play the other side a lot, but don't.

    Plus, playing both sides evenly will make you better at both, provided you put the time in.

  • Starrseed
    Starrseed Member Posts: 1,774

    I totally agree with you. I only play really rarely survivor with my wife because I can't find much fun in it. But since I'm a killer main and she's a survivor main we have a relatively good understanding of the problems each side has and I think that's is an important thing to don't fall in these bias opinions

  • Clevite
    Clevite Member Posts: 4,335

    I Think you said it perfectly.

    Both sides surely have ######### they have to deal with.

  • Zozzy
    Zozzy Member Posts: 4,759

    It would be easier to play both is q times were not abysmal in peak hours.

  • Nathan13
    Nathan13 Member Posts: 6,712

    Very well said!

  • Sludge
    Sludge Member Posts: 768
    edited April 2022

    Solo survivors have to decide if they want faster queues or better teammates, there aren't enough killers for both.

  • CluelessWanderer
    CluelessWanderer Member Posts: 939

    Solo survivor has always been the bottom rung of importance to Devs. Then Killer. Where as SWF is their darling cash cow.

    I think 4 man SWFs can absolutely obliterate Killers who aren't really advanced and experienced. Coms and the ability to plan, strategize before hand, organize perks/items etc is an insane advantage. SWF's can also be cocky and show it (not all, but you know the ones). Killer in turn might have no choice but to tunnel one person out to have a shot.

    Enter casual Solo queue (moi and company lol). I think some mid-tier Killers learn these tactics from streamers or whatnot, and use the same method. It is so easy for a Killer to win if they face-camp the fist survivor downed against Solos. Many Solo survivors being camped at the beginning opt for the 3 min penalty and D/C. I am so tired of the 3 vs 1. . Yesterday I had a Freddy so determined to tunnel me out he literally chased me all game and then facecamped. And I mean i could see up his nostrils he was so close to me. It was a rare match where my team mates knew what was going on, and despite knowing they could all run out the gate, they tried to make the rescue (team mates all coming to rescue me? It's like winning the Solo queue lottery it's so rare. One had BT and though they mobbed behind me, Freddy still went for me. He downed me again, postured, did cocky gestures, and DS got me out.

    So yep. I can't play a game where I don't bring BT or DS. It would be foolish not to. I'd love to try other perks, but at the same, I'd like to have a shot at playing the match I waited for LOL. I know Killers feel the same about some gen regression/gen control perks.

  • t0007319
    t0007319 Member Posts: 176

    Completely agree, I’m curious how hard it must be for new survivors to jump in, get tunnelled and camped, wonder what the drop off rate is for those players, obviously without good perks they’ll get dunked on hard.

    Or maybe that’s how new killer mains are born haha

  • Ruma
    Ruma Member Posts: 2,069

    Solo q can definitely be worse but it depends on your mates.


    Sometimes randoms can be the most fun you can have if you get competent mates and then its also fair for both sides.



    Sadly you mostly get selfish trash mates.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,433

    Usually when I go on a losing streak with survivor, that's what I do. "I'm tired of this! I'm gonna show how much better of a killer I am than these guys!" and then I get stomped in that too, because the survivors I get are always better than the teammates that get me killed.

  • t0007319
    t0007319 Member Posts: 176

    Hahaha I’ve had that! I play solo q a lot and sometimes after many losses I switch to killer, only to get swf, rip

  • km66
    km66 Member Posts: 111

    Yeah solo que is amazing. First match today and my teammate was working with the killer. Sigh. I do hope they somehow balance the solo experience better.

  • Kuinzu
    Kuinzu Member Posts: 134

    Solo Survivor is pretty much how I play the game constantly. I don't have any DbD friends and no one seems to add each other from SOLOQ ever, so... I enjoy it for the most part, it keeps the horror element of the game going when I'm solo q

  • MilManson
    MilManson Member Posts: 939

    It's not exactly hard to play survivor, camp pallet, camp T walls, DH, DS, iron will.

  • Bladeisbest
    Bladeisbest Member Posts: 308

    The beacon we all need. Fix the game in general. Survivor and Killer join forces to make the devs give both sides what is needed.

  • The_Krapper
    The_Krapper Member Posts: 3,259

    Welp looks like the shape shifting reptilians finally got him lol jk, but I can agree with this.

  • humanbeing1704
    humanbeing1704 Member Posts: 8,999

    that's a bit dismissive sure those can make the experience easy

  • The_Krapper
    The_Krapper Member Posts: 3,259

    Lol I was jk, there's a conspiracy theory about shape shifting reptilians it's basically the equivalent of saying you were abducted because this was a out of left field and unexpected from you but yet I do agree you're not wrong.

  • Tigernutz1979
    Tigernutz1979 Member Posts: 38

    Unfortunately in my opinion BT is a help, but doesn't prevent tunnelling. And DS is the same. If a killer wants you out, theres practically nothing you or anyone else can do about it. I personally refuse to use DS, as it doesn't stop tunnelling, just delays it. I always run BT when possible, but again as I said it doesn't stop it.


    I honestly believe that the only way to stop it is if there is a penalty of some kind introduced, yet I don't think it will. The alternative is if killers stop doing it, and judging by some messages I've seen, that simply isn't going to happen.


    I play both, and I do what I can to avoid tunnelling, camping or slugging. Yet one instance that's still fresh is where I faced 3 identical characters, who then complained of tunnelling, even though each time I had to injure then down.

  • Tigernutz1979
    Tigernutz1979 Member Posts: 38

    And of course, all 3 bombarded me with messages about killing myself, what they would do to my family, the most hateful messages I've ever seen. All because I said I tried to avoid tunnelling, yet its hard to do when theres 3 identical characters, all with flashlights, all uninjured to start with, and all running together.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,433

    You can't take those people seriously. They're always the victims of tunneling because everything the killer does is tunneling to them.

  • Tigernutz1979
    Tigernutz1979 Member Posts: 38
    edited April 2022

    Usually it just rolls off my shoulders, but they actually hit close to home on that occasion. My mum, my 7 year old, it was just vulgar, abusive and completely unnecessary.

    Was there tunnelling? Yes, but in all honesty I believe I did my bit by allowing the unhook and heal. If I am patrolling gens and I find the 3 Megs who then split off, I pick one to go for. There's no way to tell them apart. When I manage to down 1 am I supposed to check if I've already hooked them and if so leave them to be revived?

  • Tr1nity
    Tr1nity Member Posts: 5,047

    We haven't agreed much... or ever.., but this I agree with completely.

  • Mazoobi
    Mazoobi Member Posts: 1,565

    Anyone who plays both sides (at a good amount) would be able to understand the issues both sides have to deal with.

  • ImHexyAndINoed
    ImHexyAndINoed Member Posts: 504

    It's very nice to see a post most of us can agree ok, in that both sides have issues that need addressing.


    Side note kick ass name, no Bias I swear 😎



    Signed Hexy DevotedTricksterMainExtraordinare

  • Magicalclawz
    Magicalclawz Member Posts: 14
    edited April 2022

    Tell me this why is tunneling a problem??

    There is no rule book for either killers or survivours. The player can choose to play anyway they want and should not have to explain themselves afterwards.

    Survivours who complain about tunneling need to understand that its just a game and move on.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,433

    Yes, but they want to play and they can't when they get tunneled and have no anti-tunnel perks. It's a relief to get a survivor like that as killer, but nobody wants to be that survivor. I've only been in that position a couple of times, but I have to say if that was like half my survivor matches, I would have stopped playing survivor entirely.

  • Magicalclawz
    Magicalclawz Member Posts: 14

    Thats why i said its just a game not that deep. Do people really take video games that seriously? I mean its just game, if you die then play another match and if you die again play another. isnt that a part of the game? Also killers who complain about losing as well, if you loose 3,5,10 times in a row so what , loosing is the best way to learn. But this mindset is more important for survivours to learn cause they tend to take tunneling and camping to seriously.

  • DemonDaddy
    DemonDaddy Member Posts: 4,167

    I can't think of a single issue that plagues me when playing solo survivor. For the most part a vast majority of the game is dependent on my decisions.

  • ThiccBudhha
    ThiccBudhha Member Posts: 6,987

    I kind of agree, but also not really. The fact that survivors view handouts as necessary and take them for granted is disgusting. If you get downed by a Leatherface when you had an entire map to work with, not only is it fair that you die for it, but I would say it is well deserved. Git gud, baby survivor.

  • Gorgonia
    Gorgonia Member Posts: 1,607

    SWF is killing the game, both for killers and for solo queue survs like me... getting matched with 3 people that play together is BS. They always try to get you sacrificied or troll around you to get the killer's attention on you while they're on comm and you're clueless as to what the plan for the trial is... only 1 or 2 out of 10 matches with SWF you find decent people that will try and and make you have a good time as well.

  • thrawn3054
    thrawn3054 Member Posts: 5,897

    So you're saying every survivor should be able to take Bubba on a 5 gen run?

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,433

    But there's no avoiding tunneling, and theoretically it could happen to you every game. The best you can do is last as long in the first chase as possible. And really, does a survivor deserve to lose the whole game because they lost 1 chase? That's why the game needs to be pushed in a direction balance-wise to allow for multiple chases, because it allows both sides to actually play the game. You can't just "play another one" if you're getting the same results each time, even while improving.

    I don't know what else to say. You're saying that we shouldn't take video games seriously, but that we should get better which requires you to take it seriously, and if there's a problem it must be the player's fault somehow, never the game's.

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,433

    What if you get garbage teammates constantly, even though you escape often which supposedly raises your MMR?

  • danielmaster87
    danielmaster87 Member Posts: 9,433

    But that's wrong! The game is built around survivors getting chased 3 times, not once and it's over. And if the game isn't balanced around that, then it should be. You don't see anything wrong with a survivor dying guaranteed (if the killer chooses) because they went down to Leatherface once?

  • fulltonon
    fulltonon Member Posts: 5,762

    I'm not even sure what the ######### this game is balanced around anymore, game isn't balanced around anything survivors do nor anything killers do, maybe it's balanced around spectators?

  • The_BiggCheeze
    The_BiggCheeze Member Posts: 457

    I could care less honestly. As long as I'm having fun I don't care.