We need to make the benefits of camping zero.

Survivors who are camped can take points and rewards for the killer's part.

Camping is an option, but it can't be the biggest gain.

for instance:

NOW

Camping can earn 5000 points.

Chase survivors and risk mistakes to get 2000 points

Which one should the killer choose?


If want to keep camping.

Everything from the camp should go to the survivor who was camped.

We need to make the benefits of camping zero.

Comments

  • Luceus
    Luceus Member Posts: 76

    A lot of killers also camp not as a strategy, but because they know it annoys survivor and is just toxic.

    Making the benefits of camping zero is a good idea, however, just changing the bp gains won't stop toxic players and will still grant free kills, what really needs to happen is to make camping a completely unreliable.

    Someone already asked for hooks to change place when the killer camps them just like for pyramid head cages which IMO seems like a great idea

  • whereismykebab
    whereismykebab Member Posts: 228

    The killers who cam on first hook usually don't care about the points. There should be mechanics that make it possible to finish all gens and still have time to go for the rescue if the killer is continuesly camping to basically force a loss on a killer who camps on first hook.

    I would suggest that if the killer is around the hook 10 seconds after hooking and not in chase, slow down hook progression and increase gen repair speed for generators that are 40m away from the hook.