Please implement a redundant killer rule like maps
I am so tired of playing against Wesker. Three matches in a row. Wouldn’t be so bad but survivors always suicide or DC against him and I’m tired of his annoyingly huge terror radius
Comments
-
Outside of Map Offerings which already ignore the duplicate map prevention system, players don't control what map the game sends them too.
Players do control what killer they play as and creating a system that punishes people for playing popular killers is going to hurt the game in the long run.
11 -
Just means survivors won’t play so many robes against the same killer. No one is being punished.
0 -
Increasing the matchmaking times for popular killers is punishing people for playing popular killers.
5 -
Aren’t you a lovely person. 😘
2 -
You could always play killer and that way you'd never have to play a Wesker game again.
1 -
And having survivors quit the match or suicide isn’t punishing the other players for being tired of playing against the same killer two or three times in a row?
0 -
Survivors being babies isn't solved by increasing killers queue times.
6 -
I enjoy killer more so. Just more difficult to play killer when kids, little ones, fur babies or wife are around. Can’t focus like I could when I was young. Got to play survivor some too. 😁
0 -
Agree to disagree the killer ‘being punished’ then. Appreciate your opinion.
1 -
Think your proposal through completely. Bypassing killers in queue like that would worsen the wait times badly for them, and the whole in general. Such a change cannot happen.
3 -
I love these forms. What is a simple suggestion turns into people yelling and insulting each other over nothing really.
Let me try to voice my opinion without getting thrown under the bus too hard. I would love a system like this but sadly I don't think there is a way to implement it without harming que times. Do to a few killers having a extremely high pick rate of alot of survivors turn on the system it would lead to a imbalance of players waiting in que for different killers. And it would leave Wesker's waiting in longer ques waiting on survivors.
Thank you for listening to my opinion. Please don't rip me to shreds.
0 -
Its a little offtop but since skull merchant release i have encountered 4 Nurses, 2 Weskers and 1 skull merchant and 1 Blight. I'm playing at least one game a day.
I dont know where those complaints comes from. You have to be extremally unlucky :(
0 -
How about actually punish suicide/DC more instead so you will tire less lol
3 -
people act like having more killer variety is an issue. 3 Weskers in 4 matches is not going to help survivors stick around and it’s clearly going to get old fast. I don’t care if Wesker has a long queue time because I’m tired of constant dcing against him. Try another killer and break up the constant barrage of high school jock douchery.
0 -
Friendly reminder that the Wesker you don't care about is another person that just wants to play the game.
Wait, my mistake, person plays killer, therefore what they find fun should never be considered.
2 -
I prefer killer role. I also play multiple killers. It’s rare to play the same killer more than twice in a row. I like a bit of variety when I get lay. I don’t need a reminder that they are ppl but thank you for the thought.
It’s not a sin to not want to play against the same killer two or three times in a row. I also never have issues with queue times as a killer. Never more than minute tops. There are more than enough players to spread the killer experience around and have better diversity and not have to play against the same killer so many times.
0 -
Wanting variety isn't bad, but saying "Sit there staring at your screen for an hour because you want to play nurse today" is a little unreasonable.
3 -
If there are enough nurses being played over and over that a queue time of an hour hits, then there is a bigger issue. That would mean all the other killers are not being played near to her degree and that that many survivor players are being repeatedly matched against nurse after nurse.
i think the ’ increased queue time’ that people are estimating here is a bit more than what reality would reflect
im sure there are enough survivors playing that any increase in queue times for one killer would be minimal at worst
0 -
So when another Wesker happens, the people that like playing as the killer that's fun to play don't deserve games then?
1 -
Honestly this would be a good thing if it didn't increase the matchmaking time for killers. Like killers would be matched in priority against survivors who didn't just go against that same killer, and if there's not enough players then it just picks whoever so it doesn't increase queue time. However I don't actually know if it's possible and I don't think it'd be a very noticeable feature, bc popular killers will still be popular.
0 -
Why do you think there are not enough survivors to play against a different killer for a single match before being rematched to another ‘Wesker’?
1 -
Because everyone wanted to play as Wesker.
Because he's fun to play, before you ask why to that question.
1 -
I don’t enjoy playing as him so it’s not “everyone”. We will just have to agree to disagree on the entire subject. Thanks for your opinions.
0 -
Exactly... Players that play the most popular/strongest killers will be punished for longer que times but any Survivor player looking for a quick match. Good amount if not most of the rooster that is consistently of weak to average m1 killers are not good enough to have a average match; yet Survivor compliant about the same wesker, nurse, blight, etc.?!?!
If we want to see different varieties of killers, how about we Buff and Rework many of the Killer's to be strong and fun to play as; so that that you do not need to complaint about boring killers.
But then again, "Boring killers" is subjective and it is defined in many ways the Survivors want to called it. It is either:
*The killer takes no skill
*The killer power is lame and not fun to play agaisnt
*The Killer is too strong and as no counterplay for me.
*The killer power encourage camping and tunnelling, so that's dumb
*etc.
2 -
Ok, but I want to prevent playing against any Ace player and if they switch on it, it will kick them.
Sounds reasonable for sure...
Just no, do you really think Nurse would ever find a game with this system? You can as well remove top killers.
1 -
Just because you didn't like playing as him doesn't change the fact that most killers clearly did.
1 -
I also dont.
Do you have statistics?
How popular Weskers is, which of his games was due to his daily (he does not have challanges in archives?)
How this popularity dropped/rised since his release.
I would like to see that.
Especially, that in my games as surv: Weskers, Nurse and Blight was not most seen killers. Most seen was: Ghostface, Huntress and Wraith.
Please dont bring Nightlight statistics since people have to upload their games there, and as much as i can belive You are uploading all Your games, not everyone do that and thus statistics are flawed.
0 -
I'm sorry, am I the only person who ran into almost nothing but Wesker for weeks after he was released?
Were all the people who complained about going against nothing but Wesker, INCLUDING YOU RIGHT NOW, lying when they complained about going against Wesker repeatedly?
Am I having a fever dream right now?
0 -
Let's test out SWF opt out and killer ban, and then this at same time, it'd be actually funny as pretty much no one can match with people.
2
