everyone (proably) hates map offerings then what about creating some a ban maps
for example, it could be in the form of a offering that you can chosse which one map you don't wanna play it could works like im taking an ban offering for the game (map) bc i hate playing as huntress on the game then me and my enemies can't play on the game(opposite of the maps offerings that we have now) . Or maybe in other way what about vote map that killer and surviors can pick which one map they want play on for example map vote entity taking 3 maps and pepole can vote which one they want play on if some map won in vote then 2 maps are banned and a game starts on this map where pepole took his map
Comments
-
I think it will work because it's not going to mess with matchmaking, unlike perk or killer ban.
But voting for maps doesn't work because there is 4 survivors and 1 killer, maybe work if their odds made to be equal (1 killer vote = 4 survivor vote or something like that).
0 -
Just use the offering to cancel map offerings
0 -
Oh right, because I have infinite number of them and I definitely don't want to use cake each game.
4 -
Remove map offerings, but at the same time remove killer's visibility of the lobby.
No more seeing who you will go against (but only for killer, because survivors can't decide if they want to go against that wallhacking wraith), no more perks according to survivor items (lightborn if you happen to be in lobby that wants to try multiple flashlights), no more lobby shopping (so matchmaking improves drastically) and both sides loosing their advantage (4 survivor maps against 1 of the killer's) now cancels out.
But don't do cherry-picking. Both at the same time or none at all.
2 -
I think this would also be a benefit to their internal data on which maps need addressing - if certain maps are being constantly pushed aside by offerings it's clear that certain killers or survivor playstyles may need tweaking with regards to the map in question. I'd use them if they were an option - you're telling me I can never set eyes on Midwich Elementary again whilst still seeing a variety of maps in my games? Sign me up.
0 -
imo I think both should stay (they should hide the survivors' prestige, though). The problem with map offerings is that some maps are horribly skewed in favour of one side, and the solution here is simply addressing those problems by balancing those maps better instead of removing offerings altogether. On their own map offerings are fine and sometimes you just wanna see a specific realm you like, you know. I send myself to Haddonfield as Myers more often than not even if I don't do good on it with him - I just wanna roleplay. Or if I get a full RE lobby I'll send myself to RPD just to keep it accurate. Also, removing map offerings completely kills Scratched Mirror Myers.
Lobby-dodging happens because of Prestiges, not items. Perks like Franklin's and Lightborn would never be picked up if there wasn't a visible lobby (and sometimes those perks making it in can be beneficial for survivors. If they realize there's Lightborn involved early on, then the killer has just wasted a perk slot; Franklin's could also be totally wasted if the items all end up being brown crap / the survivors drop them beforehand strategically). No reason to hide the lobby when you could just hide prestiges and solve the lobby-dodging and "tunneling the P100" problems.
0 -
I am all for both things to stay. I just don't like cherry-picking. "Buff my side by removing advantages of the other side while keeping mine" is something I really don't like. Map offerings are the other side of coin as killer being able to see whole lobby - even accounts (meaning see comments, hours played and all the other info) - while survivors don't have access to these.
And it's all fine - but to balance this advantage, keep map offerings exactly as they are
0 -
map offerings should only Ban maps. one player should not be able to drag 4 other players to their preferred map.
0 -
Well are bloodpoints more important than playing different maps? I agree with map bans but I’m just saying for the time being maybe just use map cancels
0 -
I always play role that currently have BP bonus. There is never enough BP.
Don't really care about same maps, issue is that map offering means one side is prepared for that map more than other.
But without map offering mirror Myers is not a thing. Well, he is unplayable because of MFT right now, so doesn't really matter.
0
