Is it worth informing the maniac about the ease of difficulty in the match?
When a survivor leaves a match, it clearly does not benefit the team of survivors.
They don't fix it
They don't treat it
They often stand still
Often they don't save
And much more.
Is it worth informing the maniac that the game has become much easier or is it worth hiding informing the maniac that the opposing player has quit?
Is it worth informing the maniac about the ease of difficulty in the match? 7 votes
6 votes
1 vote
Comments
-
Yes, it’s worth informing so that it becomes easier for the maniac to play
The killer.
Not the maniac.
2 -
Yes, it’s worth informing so that it becomes easier for the maniac to play
I said yes. However I really didn't understand the topic so I agreed with the guy above me.
2 -
The person very likely had a bad match with an anti-social Killer acting so uncouth as to 'force' a DC from their teammate. I'd give them a pass as this being an emotional post, but if they keep it up then I'd join in correcting them.
1 -
The main job function is to prepare the sacrifice for the entity. killing is rare, why are they calld that??
0 -
No, it’s worth hiding the ability to see information about a player’s exit in order to leave at least some chance of victory for the survivors
I'll try to rephrase.
The game begins, two players leave the match.
Should the killer's side be informed that two players have left and the game has become much easier, or should the team of survivors be left with a chance for a random outcome, hiding the absence of real people in the match from the maniac?
0