The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

I Don't Know Why I Even Play This Garbage Game.......

O boy, you have to love when you finally get the evidence you were hoping to get to prove your point that this trash game is broken beyond belief. YOU TELL ME HOW THIS IS FAIR AND ALLOWED BHVR!? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZB7h3Nn333I&ab_channel=EmeraldStar

Comments

  • dwight444
    dwight444 Member Posts: 435

    which is absurd

    I'll have a killer on video humping me under a hook til I bleed out and will get the usual 'slugging is not a bannable offense' ok but I think this beyond slugging, it's just flat out griefing and keeping me hostage

    bhvr has bots for support who read the same prompt

  • HaunterofShadows
    HaunterofShadows Member Posts: 4,092
    edited January 9

    Yeah but here the killer isn't even bleeding them out. He just knocked all four of them down then went back and hooked them

  • dwight444
    dwight444 Member Posts: 435

    yeah ik,I was more so piggybacking the other guy's point that bhvr wouldn't take action either way as they see slugging in a vacuum w/o any context

  • SMitchell8
    SMitchell8 Member Posts: 3,302

    Delete this daft thread. The survivors got out played in 5 mins. Would be like moaning that you're 5 nil down at HT on FIFA 🙄

  • radiantHero23
    radiantHero23 Member Posts: 4,228

    If you literally reported that killer, I can't help you.

    A piece of advice. Look up for what you can report players and for what you cant report players.

  • CorvusCorax86
    CorvusCorax86 Member Posts: 1,072

    Slugging is nasty but in the video you are all hooked. If Bubba felt he could take a risk by downing all of you then it can be perceived as an efficient tactic.

    Real slugging is when you are all left on the ground and the killer just watches or humps or does something else they find "funny". It is, unfortunately, not a bannable offence. I had my fair share of reports / tickets / video evidence submitted for this purpose.

  • mecca
    mecca Member Posts: 326

    Imagine if this was turned around and the killer couldn't play the game.

    Gentapping was apparently ""unfair"''.

    Yet, in the same video game survivors can be slugged and prevented from playing the game. Also, as OP pointed out, he could have been more like the norm and let everyone bleed out for minutes. Why no forfeit option at least? Killer enjoyment is always taking priority.

    Double standards is why this game is dying unfortunately. Too much favoritism for one side.

  • Chaosrider
    Chaosrider Member Posts: 489

    At least youre lucky enough that he started hooking you. There are a bunch of killers refusing to hook you so you would really bleed out after dumb 4 minutes.

  • TAG
    TAG Member Posts: 12,871

    It is by definition not hostage-taking. Hostage taking explicitly requires the game to go on indefinitely for super long periods of time. Bleeding out takes four minutes. There is no scenario where bleeding out by itself is a valid reason for being reported.

  • Unequalmitten86
    Unequalmitten86 Member Posts: 272

    It is a common problem and the only ones that defend it are killer mains.

  • ratcoffee
    ratcoffee Member Posts: 1,470

    OP: "It's really messed up how people are allowed to do this"

    you: "yeah but have you considered that people are allowed to do that, lol owned"

    idk if i'm more embarrassed or amused at your failure to understand the not-even two lines of text from OP

  • tippy2k2
    tippy2k2 Member Posts: 5,204

    I understand it perfectly. The OP doesn't give any context whatsoever and just complains that the four of them went down and threatened to report the killer for something they are well within their right to do.

  • Dionysusdog
    Dionysusdog Member Posts: 154

    Chill on the random rage....temper tantrums are bad look.

  • ratcoffee
    ratcoffee Member Posts: 1,470

    i love how i pointed out that OP's ultimate point is that he thinks the killer shouldn't be allowed to 4 slug people, and you responded by

    -claiming you understood the point of OP's post, but then

    -repeated your claim that "the killer is allowed to 4 slug if he wants" without responding to the "should be able to" argument

    an actual coherent response would involve explaining why killers should be allowed to 4 bleed out, why allowing such a playstyle is healthy for the game; not simply repeating the same point that doesn't actually relate to what OP's saying