Adrenaline needs to be changed

Options
2»

Comments

  • porphyra
    porphyra Member Posts: 4
    Options

    No? If all 4 survs are running it and all 4 are alive by the time the last gen pops, you absolutely deserve the L. Maybe kill them before that point?

    Also, I'd have to see actual prevalence on how many games *all* survivors are running it because anecdotally I really just...haven't been that bothered by it.

  • codebibi
    codebibi Member Posts: 64
    Options

    i don't understand why people cry so much about adrenaline. you literally play the entire game with 3 perks so if you died before the end the perk is useless and it is supposed to reward the survivor for being good and last to the endgame and it only activate for 5 seconds and then its gone.

  • goodfriday
    goodfriday Member Posts: 209
    Options

    Yet they do not see how noed is a way bigger crutch, because the survivors do their job to complete the gens and you can afk then use some annoying killer like wraith and end up with 3/4k . Imagine making a perk work for you who did nothing by the survivors completing their objective.

    Also noed =adrenaline counter, amount of time I see killer still down a survivor with it specially if it was at the very wrong time the gen pop. Even more sad the perk has been in the game since its birth right. Idk killers just expect survivors to maybe play with 0 perks at this point. You seeing even background player complaint topics now lol.

  • codebibi
    codebibi Member Posts: 64
    Options

    so true killers sometimes fake being afk and then 4k with it it's ridiculous. noed is way stronger than adrenaline and has never being changed and you barely see people complain about it.

  • Withered8
    Withered8 Member Posts: 1,232
    Options

    Exactly, no one's denying it strong but if people want it nerfed i would like to know why they suddenly think its such an issue now and to explain their reasoning.

  • Withered8
    Withered8 Member Posts: 1,232
    Options

    Ok so when adrenaline's nerfed however what's next on the chopping block, are they more perks you think are too OP? Are people still gonna complain about it after the upcoming nerfs? I think the upcoming nerfs are rather fair.

  • ReverseVelocity
    ReverseVelocity Member Posts: 3,165
    Options

    I mean that's just kinda how Live Service games are. Things will become too strong relative to everything else, get nerfed, a new meta emerges, that gets nerfed. It's an ongoing cycle.

  • Withered8
    Withered8 Member Posts: 1,232
    Options

    Fair point that's true.

    Just think background player was currently a more problematic perk but oh well. I have a problem with them not touching new broken perks for a set period even when they are blatantly op, like considering how long its taken then to change ultimate weapon. If they can change adren why not change all these other perks which are probably far worse.

  • AmpersandUnderscore
    AmpersandUnderscore Member Posts: 1,259
    Options

    A 'crutch perk' heavily implies that the player can't play the game without it. I'm not sure why anyone would refer to an end game perk as 'crutch' given that you play the entire match without it.