DS buff should be reverted

Zaydin
Zaydin Member Posts: 275
edited June 2 in Feedback and Suggestions

Why? Because survivors are abusing it to grief Killers. Case in point: I had a match where a bully SWF duo were using DS to stun me, dive into a locker and then head on stun me since the stun animation lasted long enough for them to charge Head On.

All it takes is one bad apple to spoil the bunch.

Either that or give Killers stun immunity for like 30 seconds after getting stunned once.

Comments

  • Emeal
    Emeal Member Posts: 5,113

    Honestly the tools to prevent Tunneling should be in the Survivors not unhooking next to the Killer, or trying to take a hit after being unhooked. or waiting until the Killer is chasing someone else. Rather than punishing the Killer for playing the game.

    Luckily the perk is nerfed next patch, cause bHVR could see it was too much.

  • TheRealConsent
    TheRealConsent Member Posts: 245

    If you don't bodyblock after getting unhooked you won't get tunneled.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,772

    To be fair, at no point do you have to get stunned by DS. You're always making the active choice to pick up someone you know was unhooked recently in those scenarios, and you could actively choose to ignore them instead.

    You're always opting in to letting survivors bully you with DS. Just don't do that, lol.

  • albertoplus
    albertoplus Member Posts: 373

    Its true that 3 seconds DS was not doing much most of the time honestly. The problem with DS is that is still another "band-aid solution perk" to a much deeper problem.

    Tunneling seems to be the best strat a lot of times, because getting someone out fast is better than trying to spread hooks and shooting yourself in the leg as the killer. Maybe its about time to try and reward the killers for spreading hooks instead of punishing them for tunneling. Because there are times where they shouldnt actually be punished for tunneling:

    • Times where tunneling is just an absolute need, like gens start getting done fast and no one is dead. Not getting someone out of the game fast on this moment is like putting a "Mr Nice hat" on you and giving survivors an advantage on purpose.
    • Times where the game sees that you are tunneling where you actually were not. Like, someone gets unhooked, you are in a chase with another survivor. You down him and hook him. You leave the place and find the one that got unhooked and down him. You pick him and you get DS'd. Like, you were absolutely not tunneling, why you should eat a DS?

    Stop punishing killers for tunneling/camping and just reward them for not doing so. Make them want to go fast af into chase another survivor instead of trying to get someone out fast as hell.

  • TheRealConsent
    TheRealConsent Member Posts: 245

    True, my bad. I should have let the bodyblocker tank 2 hits, ruin my pressure on his teammate, then let him stay on the ground so that his teammates can come pick him up later.

    Why don't I just give you guys a free gen?

  • TheRealConsent
    TheRealConsent Member Posts: 245

    Then you're either playing Nurse, or are not getting survivors that know what they're doing.

    I'm talking about scenarios where you DO need to hit them. Any survivor with enough brains will absolutely manage to bodyblock you. Either on the corner of a loop, between 2 rocks or a doorway. You're going to have to hit. Then, the same situation will repeat. Two hit cooldowns against the unhooker will lose you too much distance for that chase to be worth anything, and you won't be able to pick up the one guy you did down.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,772

    Nope, I play weaker killers for the most part. Strongest I play on a regular basis is Nemesis. Or maybe Skull Merchant? Whichever of those two you think is stronger.

    Yes, I'm talking about those scenarios as well. You ignore them until they force it with that scenario, you hit them to remove their collision, and then you CONTINUE ignoring them. They will need time and distance to get into position for another bodyblock again, time and distance during which you're gaining on your actual target and during which they're not progressing generators or resetting or contributing anything at all to the match.

    In that scenario, the scenario you're describing, you are just chasing two survivors at once. That's a win.

  • MechWarrior3
    MechWarrior3 Member Posts: 2,375

    You can tell if DS is still active by when you did the unhook but also generally if the survivor is teabagging you it’s because they want to activate their decisive strike.

  • Ohyakno
    Ohyakno Member Posts: 1,189

    There's still two dudes on generators while you're fruitlessly chasing two survivors who are the next best thing to invincible. Progress is being made for the survivor team while you're faffing around being bodyblocked or slugging the survivor who almost certainly has unbreakable.

    It's undeniably strong, which is why good survivors do it.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,772

    The alternative is to have three dudes on generators while you're chasing the one survivor for a slightly shorter amount of time, so that's a good thing, not a bad thing.

    It's undeniably more fun than resetting or playing it safe, especially if the killer takes the bait, which a lot of killers do. That's why survivors in general do it.

  • ad19970
    ad19970 Member Posts: 6,384

    Simply rewarding killers for not tunneling isn't enough. Killers will still tunnel because it's the easy way out. Tunneling and camping also need to be nerfed to not be such effective strategies anymore, there is no other way around it.

    Even during the Eruption meta, where killers definitely didn't need to tunnel, there were still enough tunneling and camping killers.

    And to be honest, I still believe, even as a killer main myself, that at the moment you really don't need to tunnel and camp, even against really good survivors.

  • nodforkiss
    nodforkiss Member Posts: 196

    its hilarious how people defend DS. its a bad game design. no it doesnt punish tunnelers it just gives survivor a ######### you button which killer either loses pressure and take the stun, or slug and find another chase only to slugged survivor get back up with UB anyway.

  • Zaydin
    Zaydin Member Posts: 275

    They were deliberately engineering the setup. It was a bully duo.

  • Zaydin
    Zaydin Member Posts: 275

    They were a bully duo working together to engineer the plays.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,772

    They can't engineer you into picking up the survivor with DS, you have to make the decision to take the bait they're putting in front of you.

    If there's two people buzzing around you, and one just got unhooked, that's the one you need to ignore.

  • albertoplus
    albertoplus Member Posts: 373

    Eruption had not much to do with tunneling tho? You kicked the gens and down anyone, the gens explode. Tunneling just made that even easier. Thats why i think there is a need to reward killers for going against multiple people. Doesnt matter if there are times where some killer perks are strong and favour them a lot, tunneling will make those times even easier for them.

    But what on those two situation i did describe on my last comment tho?

    If no one is killed and there is only one gen left, for sure you can maybe still win without tunneling someone out, but you are giving survivors an advantage on purpose on that situation, as in the best case scenario one will be hooked, other unhooking, other being chased and the last one will be on the last gen, making it almost impossible to defend it.

    And what on the other situation, if you just go into a chase with someone and other survivor gets unhooked, you hook the survivor you are chasing, go patrol gens, find the one who got unhooked, down him and get DS if you pick him? You were fore sure not tunneling at all.

    I mean yes you can just slug the survivor just in case, but the question is, why you should do it? Why you have to respect an "anti tunnel" perk when you are not tunneling at all?

  • HPhoenix
    HPhoenix Member Posts: 615

    I just slug em and move on, honestly.

  • Xernoton
    Xernoton Member Posts: 5,821

    No. If anything, DS should be buffed even more and get a few extra restrictions. As an anti tunnel perk DS is not strong enough in my opinion. You give up one of your 4 perk slots in order to prevent the killer from tunneling or at least make it risky. 5 seconds was barely enough for the average survivor, much less 4 seconds.

    However, I fully agree, that the aggressive use of DS should not be supported. Reading over past patch notes, it is pretty clear that DS is supposed to be an anti tunnel perk and nothing else. But running up to the killer and making yourself a meat shield for your team mate isn't actually the killer tunneling you.

  • LapisInfernalis
    LapisInfernalis Member Posts: 4,218

    Just ignore them. They get bored fast. They are also not doing gens, so what's the problem? Or eat the DS and be fine for the rest of the match. They can only use it once.

    Not a big deal.

  • LapisInfernalis
    LapisInfernalis Member Posts: 4,218

    This is why i propose a mechanic where a survivor does not loose a hook state if they are hooked multiple times in a row. They still need to get rescued within 60s or they will go to 2nd stage/die like normal though. So the killer basically cannot tunnel anymore but time-out a survivor if they get hooked 2x in a row. This mechanic should deactivate ones 2 Survivors are dead as well as during the EGC. Maybe it should also deactivate when you do a conspicuous action, so it can't be abused.

    Then DS would not be needed.

  • LapisInfernalis
    LapisInfernalis Member Posts: 4,218

    Sometimes you can't help it because the (injured) unhooker moves so you tank a hit for them (such animates). I also don't like bodyblocking if you were just unhooked, but if they swarm you anyway and don't have OTR (which you can hear) they have DS. So you just slug them. Either they use UB and are up again (so stay close) after 20s or wait until 60s are done and hook them. I have done that for ages when DS hat a 60s invincibility counter and it worked just fine.

  • Slan
    Slan Member Posts: 306
    edited June 4

    I spoke about this in an ancient post. I was having a similar issue with bully squads and head on. However, 30 seconds of immunity may be too much and could easily be too much of a game changer. Instead, I proposed having a 3-4 second timelapse in which you are immune to stuns, detering bully squads from bullying you, as in that time you are able to move and avoid the second immediate stun or simply punish them for their toxicity.

  • Haufman0313
    Haufman0313 Member Posts: 14

    count to 60…

  • mizark3
    mizark3 Member Posts: 2,253

    The problem there lies in that the Survivors can't control the Killer's movement. I was running in the open, no pallet no windows, near a progressed gen, and the Killer still dropped chase to tunnel after unhook crossmap. The Killer always has a choice to chase the remaining 75% of the lobby, so punishing them for targeting 25% of the lobby is nowhere near punishing them for playing the game.

    DS should be a 30s stun for Killer and Survivor at this point, and the Killer can always hit the tunneled Survivor after the stun. It would be more of a deterrent to needless tunneling than a 3/4/5s stun where the Survivor gets no meaningful distance. Alternatively if we are going to have a 3/4s DS, it should work after every hook stage.

  • Emeal
    Emeal Member Posts: 5,113
    edited June 4

    The problem there lies in that the Survivors can't control the Killer's movement. 

    You can its called body blocking.