Should Huntress get her buffs reverted?

No, she’s fine.

GF and Legiond did get buffs

The hatchet count buff should be reverted but the windup time buff is absolutely necessary and I don't understand why people complain about it as thought they wouldn't be complaining if babushka got nerfed without the basekit being buffed, crazy thought but maybe addon reliance isnt good game design?

Exactly

Well, it's not enough

She's fine. I get that survs want easier games against her, but any decent surv who know's how to consistently break line of sight doesn't even need to be good at dodging hatchets. I play her a lot and don't feel like I win any more games since they buffed her.

I quess we can't nerf just pc so keep them.

No. This is what's called proactive balancing. It must've slipped through the cracks at BHVR, because they're always reactive, but someone must have seen that Huntress was gonna fall behind in the tier list, like way behind, and suggested a buff. What you would have us do is believe she's Blight level, accounting for perfect accuracy and always winning mindgames, when in reality I'd probably rather play Pig or Deathslinger than her because even they're more consistent than 5-hatchet Huntress. You may yet get your wish, and she'll be nerfed. Then when people notice, "Oh, now she's at C-D tier because of power creep, and is always losing vs good teams, now we can buff her." That's reactive balancing, and it's why killer is the way it is, and why people want to run to the 60% kill rate to prove their point, because they know practically speaking everything else goes against their claims.

Because she's not that good. No 110% killer is. They're 110% because they're supposed to be powerful, but they've all been balanced to where their strength doesn't even break even with the movement speed downside. "What? But Huntress, Hag, and Spirit are SO STRONG!" Until they go against a team that uses a minutiae of brainpower, and employs their counters. Huntress, hug everything til she's close enough, then the real chase begins. Hag, disrupt traps and don't run straight into an area you know she's set up in. And Spirit, just play normal and stay out of grass, because you get Iron Will for free anyway.

She's the same but with more hatchets, bro. You literally said it. Huntress "proxy camps" hook whether she's trying to or not, because she's a ranged killer. If survivors think it's smart to heal under hook, or to not look for where she is before they unhook, that's on them. And the "throwing fridges" thing I keep seeing about her is the fakest claim. You try throwing over half the loops in the game, and watch as they turn into dust instead of hitting the survivor whose hitbox is clearly hittable. If the hitbox for her was so generous, she'd just hit them every time.

Her not getting that movement speed buff was huge. It means that the scenario still exists where, "Oh, the survivor found a rock loop? Time to waste 45 seconds for maybe a hit, or let them get away for free!"

We can expect her to see tournament play then, alongside Nurse and Blight?

Tbh it's more often than not the case that it really is just because they're the most popular and not because they're necessary, and then even if they are necessary there's usually better solutions to the problems the addons solve than the addons themselves

Do you really have to get so defensive about everything that remotely suggests killers need nerfs? My post was verbatim "She doesn't feel oppressive and her counterplay is fine but all the camptresses are annoying." I don't know how you interpreted that as a threat.

You've been around long enough to understand that a killer's average playstyle will change due to trends and mechanical changes across the game, not just tweaks to that killer themselves. Like Plague became more popular when CoH was meta, and Freddy became less popular when BT was changed to work regardless of TR, and Artist was actually played for a brief period of time when Dead Man's Switch was buffed to work with Pain Res and then promptly nerfed again. More people are proxy camping with Billy now not because Billy couldn't camp before, not because he's any better at it now, but because he's still good at it and he just got a flat power boost that attracted the meta crowd, while previously nobody was playing Billy except newbies and double engraving Billy fanatics. Meanwhile less people are camping with Bubba, the previous champion of camping killers, because he is no longer as good at it with the distance requirement. But those players are still playing DBD, they're just migrating to other killers who's better at how they want to play.

Huntress is good at camping because she does the same thing she always did, but she has more hatchets and doesn't trip the AFC, so more people are playing Huntress for that purpose. And more Huntresses are just patrolling hooks with pre-nocked hatchets and that's annoying. I don't really appreciate the implication that this only happens when survivors are stupid and heal under hook or lead the killer back to the hook, because I've vsed 2 hard proxy camping Huntresses since Monday out of… 15? survivor games. And saw several more during the event. My prior experience with Huntresses would occasionally contain this, but usually it was the opportunism you're describing and not a Bubba-like devotion to the hook. Or long-distance hatchets or endgame plays.

I'm not interested in debating the existence of poor hitboxes. The fridge claim is a colloquialism based on killer-sided server validation (which, before you jump down my throat, I agree is completely necessary, you couldn't hit survivors otherwise) and hits looking normal from the Huntress's end while clipping survivors who, from their end, had cleared a corner or juked by a decent margin. She actually throws beach balls. But c'mon. I've got 4000 hours in this game. I've seen some bullshit hits. You've seen some bullshit hits. To claim otherwise would be disingenuous.