The second iteration of 2v8 is now LIVE - find out more information here: https://forums.bhvr.com/dead-by-daylight/kb/articles/480-2v8-developer-update

You Shouldn't Be Patrolling Generators (Or Kicking Them That Much Either)

jesterkind
jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

I said earlier in another thread this is something that should be talked about more on the forums, so I figured a post about it would be appropriate. This is also something of a mini-essay on effectively spreading pressure, since the two concepts are pretty heavily linked.

So then. There is a tooltip in this game, shown in the loading screens, that I think does incalculable damage to people's ability to play killer effectively if they follow it too blindly: "Patrolling generators is a great way to find survivors". There are people who seem to think that patrolling generators, therefore, is part of their core gameplay loop and part of how to play killer on a basic level; this also plays into people's misconception that generators are the killer's objective and stalling them is also therefore an important part of the core loop.

Neither of these things are true. Generators aren't the objective, and patrolling them is a good way to lose in a huge number of circumstances.

The reason I believe it's a really bad idea to patrol generators is simply that it's way too much downtime. The most important thing to be doing as killer at any given moment is generating pressure - that is to say, doing things that force survivors to react to you in ways that slow down the overall generator speed. You shouldn't be patrolling generators because you should be in chase, or where applicable, setting up a power. If you've just gotten a hook, you should be capitalising on that opportunity by going directly to a chase, and if you have to patrol generators to do it, you're just leaving tons of potential pressure laying there, unspent and unclaimed… which leaves the survivors who would be getting pressured free to do whatever they want, which, if they're smart, is gonna be generator repair.

If, instead, you bring one or two info perks so you know at least where survivors were a short while ago, you can get into that important next chase much more quickly, and start the ideal efficiency loop - one in chase, one on hook, one peeling away to save.

Combine that with some good chase knowledge to finish the chase in a timely manner, and you're well on your way to snowballing a victory. You're giving all of that up by focusing on generators at all, frankly.

I'm not saying to never kick/damage generators, mind, but they're not a core objective of yours. It doesn't actually matter if those generators get done, if you kill all the survivors by the end. They're just a timer you can delay a little, not the main focus of your efforts. For the same reasons, patrolling generators is just a last-ditch attempt at finding survivors if you have no other information to work from, and you kinda want to avoid that when you can.

«1

Comments

  • smurf
    smurf Member Posts: 357
    edited November 22

    I like to run Surveillance on Pig, which makes kicking gens tell me where my next target is in addition to giving regression. That lets me push them off a gen, and start almost all chases with the survivor injured (as long as I approach without line of sight).

    But yeah, agreed. Survivors are the target, not gens.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    The problem with that is that we are not in the gen-kick meta anymore, and 3-genning has been severely weakened on everyone on top of Skull Merchant in particular especially not being able to do it effectively anymore.

    If you try and take that strategy into the current state of the game, you're setting yourself up to lose and in a lot of cases generators are going to go quicker because you can't be everywhere at once and the further gens from you are free to be worked on.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    Patrolling gens is a bad thing to just do by default even without aura perks, that's the point I'm making.

    Aura perks make things easier, but they aren't The Reason that you don't "need" to patrol gens. Patrolling gens is not active or efficient gameplay either way.

  • Reinami
    Reinami Member Posts: 5,546
    edited November 22

    If you start a chase with a survivor hit them, and they immediately run to a loop that contains killer shack into jungle gym into main building and its away from where someone is that you just hooked and away from generators, you are wasting your time and should go back to patrolling generators.

    The reason most killers lose games is not because they are patrolling gens, but because they are wasting too much time in chases. The first thing you should be doing as soon as you load into the map is identifying where the strong loops are (usually near main buildings and killer shacks) and then trying to chase survivors away from those areas, and not to them.

    I mostly agree about kicking gens. Generally you should really only kick gens if you have perks that are making that useful like Pop/Nowhere to Hide/Unforeseen etc.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    Going "back" to patrolling gens sounds like you were doing that to begin with, which you shouldn't be.

    Part of the decision making surrounding dropping chase is if you have another chase you can get into quickly. If you're dropping a chase that'd only take longer than you'd like and you're instead wandering around generators without achieving anything for the same amount of time, you're in a worse position than if you just took the chase. At least at the end of the chase you've used up resources and gained a hook- patrolling generators gives you nothing.

    As I said in the post, patrolling generators is a last resort for when you don't have anything else, and I think killer players as a whole need to understand that avoiding that last resort is part of getting better at killer. Knowing where survivors are likely to be based on prior information and game sense is something that separates bad killers from great ones— and I'm not even saying I can do that wholly without perks, but I know that it's something I could and probably should improve if I want to get better.

  • Reinami
    Reinami Member Posts: 5,546

    "Patrolling" is probably a misnomer. The point is, you should be going from chase to chase. But those chases should ideally start at a generator, not near killer shack, or an area of the map where survivors have completed generators.

  • Lixadonna
    Lixadonna Member Posts: 257

    I find patrolling to be disengaging from the game so in the end I agree with the point you are making.

  • Devil_hit11
    Devil_hit11 Member Posts: 8,881

    because of 400% regression speed. generator regression needs buffs because it is currently noob-trap kick gens unless you build entire build around kicking gens.

    the newbie tip in game for patrolling gens is a tip for new player to find chases because a lot of new players don't know how to find any chases.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    There's definitely the possibility of some confusion in language, so I don't mind clarifying a little:

    To me, patrolling generators means walking from one generator to the next in the hopes of finding a survivor, or to delay their progress without committing to a chase. Either of those is a bad idea, and should be avoided where possible, excepting for very narrow circumstances.

    If you're just walking directly to one specific generator that you know (or strongly suspect, at least) a survivor is on with the specific aim of starting a chase, that's a different thing entirely.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    I do know it's for new players, but I think it builds bad habits. I think it tells new players "the way you find survivors is by patrolling gens, so do that every match to find your chases".

    I'm not really necessarily blaming just that one tooltip for this, it's just a good thing to point to for framing my argument. I'm telling those players here myself, you should be tracking survivors directly and just going straight to them, not wandering around their objectives without a plan.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    Like I said above, you are very likely to be walking to a generator when you're initiating a chase, but walking between them as your main method of tracking survivors is asking to lose.

    Ideally, you should already know where survivors are through other means, whether that's basekit means like spying a crow flying in the distance or catching a scratch mark against the wall, or from information perks giving you more precise information. If you are absolutely stumped, patrolling generators will help, but part of honing killer skill is avoiding ever being in that position to begin with.

  • TheSingularity
    TheSingularity Member Posts: 136

    I got ya. Mindlessly following a gen route really isn't that useful there's far better ways to track. Most come with more experience as some methods you listed.

  • beater15
    beater15 Member Posts: 14

    "Generators aren't the objective" - they're literally the main objective, and patrolling a 3 gen can be a huge win condition. But yes it's not good to generalize this

  • GeneralV
    GeneralV Member Posts: 11,368
    edited November 22

    The reason most killers lose games is not because they are patrolling gens, but because they are wasting too much time in chases.

    Honestly, I blame the sheer amount of anti-loop killers added to the game in quick succession for that.

    We've had way too many characters who are extremely oppressive in chases and that is their only power. If their chases fail, the killer just falls apart. These characters are very unlikely to drop chase, because it is what they are designed to do.

  • Rulebreaker
    Rulebreaker Member Posts: 2,034

    We don't think it's a clear cut case. Patrolling gens shouldn't be the go to without a reason (ex: you have pop or don't know where someone is) but not paroling them every once in awhile isn't ideal either unless your getting downs and finding survivors extremely quickly. Also if the survivor is in a area you absolutely know will burn to much time, its better to patrol the gens for a quicker target or to get that one in a different position. It's dictated on circumstances.

  • Marc_go_solo
    Marc_go_solo Member Posts: 5,330

    The tooltip itself has nothing wrong with it. It's logical to suggest patrolling gens when looking for survivors is a great way to locate them. Afterall, the gens are the only real way survivors will ever make it out.

    The issue is more with those killers who decide that this is the only way - something this tooltip has never said. Finding survivors is key, but the best way to slow the gens I've found is aggressively injuring, downing and hooking multiple survivors. There have been many occasions where my killer games have lost because of being unable to put the pressure on survivors. In games where I have, I have pretty much won every one, because they get caught in a spiral of healing, hiding, and losing hope.

    When killers solely patrol gens, the problem is that they change the role from an aggressor to a defender. Now that gens have a limited number of times they can be kicked before being blocked from further regression, survivors can afford to chip away. I've won a few games as survivor because the killer opted for a 3-gen, and all survivors knew what to do. There's always a place for regressing gens, but never do it to the point that it overtakes the aggression.

  • PetTheDoggo
    PetTheDoggo Member Posts: 218

    I mean, unless you play killer with very fast chases, you need to worry about gens, there are simply gens worth defending.

    You shouldn't try to defend all gens, but I don't think not defending any is better.

    • don't chase survivors into areas with no gens unless you down them very fast or need them for perk (Grim/pain res)
    • don't chase a survivor which won't give you any resource in next 20 seconds (injury, down, pallet)

    Knowing when to drop chase is way more important than saying don't protect your gens imo…

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436
    edited November 22

    There ARE reasons to check gens but yes, especially on some Killers ( *coughLOWMOBILITYKILLERScough* ), it's better to disengage and use them solely to find Survivors, maybe kick if need be. Knowing when to disengage is very important. Why else do you think Killers use stuff like Pain Res and Grim Embrace?

  • Akumakaji
    Akumakaji Member Posts: 5,468

    Here is a challenge: try equipping more then 4 aura reading perks. Its quite the insane hot take, I know, but actually non of those hyperbole 500 perks beyond the potential 4 in the game matter.

    Even if the killer got 2 add-ons that add aura reading, thats 6 sources of aura, max. And while figuring all these perks out is not an easy task, a killer who runs nothing but aura perks and add-ons will have a much, much weaker chase game.

    I also know that you are most likely one of this contrary forum users, who love to incite the tread by throwing in such statements, so I am actually pretty counterproductive, writing long paragraphs to a 5s throwaway line, but who cares, thats just how I roll.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    So, I want to restate for a moment that I'm not saying to completely ignore generators entirely. It's important to keep in mind for the rest of my points.

    From there, I don't really disagree with your points, but it really doesn't have much to do with "protecting gens", so to speak. You shouldn't chase survivors away from areas with generators, but that's because you'd then be too far away from the other survivors, meaning more downtime before you can get back into the action and less opportunity to steer the chase into generators being worked on.

    It's not that you need to stop the generators being done, it's that your objectives concentrate around the generators. That's why you'd want to be in proximity to them, not to defend or protect them. Like I said, the generators matter in that they're a timer, but they're not your objective.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    Even using them as a way of finding survivors is a last resort when you don't have any other method of finding survivors, because every other method is so much better that you should be trying to avoid relying on generator patrol when possible.

    Disengaging is important, but part of knowing when is knowing when getting into another chase would be fast enough that it's worth doing. Disengaging from a bad chase to spend half a minute or more looking for another survivor is not actually a particularly good trade, in my opinion.

    That's my overall point, you don't focus on the generators, you focus on your objectives directly. Generators can be a useful tool, but not the primary tool or concern.

  • TheWheelOfCheese
    TheWheelOfCheese Member Posts: 696

    This is kind of a weird post. The hint text doesn't say to kick gens and ignore survivors, it says patrolling gens can help you find survivors, which is true and useful. There are other ways to find survivors as well, and those are learned in time.

    I think you're spending a lot of time arguing against a straw man you've created.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    I'm not actually mad at the tooltip, it's just a good thing to point to for what I'm talking about, which is players who think they actually need to patrol gens.

    I think that taking the tooltip literally would lead to what I'm describing, but I don't think that's the sole reason for all the people who currently act that way. It's just something to frame the conversation so people know what I'm talking about.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    I'm realising I really shouldn't have brought up the tooltip at all, now everyone thinks that's the focus as opposed to the people who talk about patrolling generators…

    But still, "go gen to gen to find survivors" is the thing I'm saying people shouldn't do, regardless of where they got the idea. The tooltip was just phrased in a way that helped my point because it talked about finding survivors, which was the angle I was taking too: That's the worst way of doing it and should be a last resort, not a basic gameplan.

  • Caiman
    Caiman Member Posts: 2,907

    So where should I go to find survivors, if not generators?

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    My point is that tracking survivors directly is a stronger gameplan by far than just making a patrol around generators to hopefully stumble across one.

    Info perks are the easiest way of doing this, but there are basekit things to use as well. Crows flying and scratch marks on walls are the biggest ones, but situationally you've got loud noise notifications as well. Plus, y'know, visually seeing them while you're in chase and making your way there after the chase ends.

    Until you get to that level of mastery, though, info perks. Info perks are how you get that information. Walking aimlessly around generators is a bad idea, going directly to the generators you know are being worked on is a good idea.

  • E2B2
    E2B2 Member Posts: 5

    I mean yeah, info perks are an alternative to patrolling generators. Understanding where survivors are is a thing without info perks anyway, and survivors will often go to generators. Patrolling generators is just part of gamesense and understanding how survivors move around the map, which is where you find the survivors when you're immediately trying to find a chase. And applying pressure isn't just about chase for every killer, it's often better to go toward a generator to stop it being done than it is to finish a chase and get hooks. That only really works entirely for killers like Spirit, Blight, Nurse, etc who can finish chases very quickly and apply pressure across the map just by existing. Use info perks to patrol gens less if you want, or just understand that survivors will use their downtime to do gens, and be there to stop them when they have it.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    I disagree, I think if you're ever in a position where you are just walking from generator to generator and hoping to find someone, you are doing something wrong. Sometimes it's unavoidable, but the next step after finding yourself in that position is to identify why and see what you could've done to avoid it.

    The thing that gives survivors their downtime as a team is when you're not chasing someone and you don't have someone on the hook. That's what pressure is: Survivors who react to your actions with something other than generator repair. If you're just walking between generators, the generators you're not currently next to are being worked on, and you are gaining nothing.

    If, instead, you already know where the survivors are through a variety of means including info perks, you can go straight to the survivor and start your pressure immediately, no time spent not doing anything of note.

  • Azarath415_YT
    Azarath415_YT Member Posts: 8

    The purpose of the tip is to let newer players know that since the generators are the main objective of the survivors, it makes sense to go to their objectives to start a chase and all that. Obviously everyone at some point knows not to go in a huge circle around the map to find survivors and if you genuinely think killers are just that stupid and you're that upset over a tip in the game that literally no one is gonna read anyway, then you need to hop off the game and play something else. Sure obviously the main objective of the killer is to kill the survivors, but how do you expect them to find survivors? Around generators and random tiles they happen to pass by. So while it may not be the best tip in your opinion, it's still a good tip for beginner players to have an idea on how to find survivors. No one ever said that patrolling generators is their main objective and you don't gotta act like everyone ever did say that. And killers should be kicking generators because it slows the game down which gives the killer an easier time and also more time to kill the survivors. I highly doubt you've ever touched killer a day in your life if you genuinely think a killer has that mindset and they should just never go near generators or kick them. Like what do you expect killers to do? Give you a free escape? Obviously not. They're gonna kill you whether you like it or not and you will accept it

  • Azarath415_YT
    Azarath415_YT Member Posts: 8

    You do realize that the tip is for beginner players right? There's no way you genuinely think it's something the average killer thinks about and yes patrolling gens is the best thing you can do to find survivors. Do you expect killers to just sit in a corner of the map and magically find survivors that way? Because it doesn't work like that

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    I'm not actually mad at the tooltip, I've said that a few times, it's just a way of framing my argument.

    My argument is more in response to people I've seen talk about generators as though they're supposed to be patrolling them and defending them jealously. I play killer a fair amount myself, which is why I think the comments I see dotted around the place could do with responding to overall— hence the post.

    I've also, pretty obviously, never said the killer shouldn't touch generators at all. I made sure to say the opposite in the post- sometimes it's a good idea! But, it's crucial to remember that stalling the generators is not your objective and it's very, very easy to fall into the trap of paying too much attention to generators instead of your real objective. You generally don't want to kick a generator unless you have something in your build to improve the action, or you've just downed someone in the area so you might as well. Very few scenarios otherwise would be worth it.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    Last resort? It's the Killer's basekit tool. Part of several basekit tools Killers have, like crows and unhook notifications.

    Fortunately, most of the time, Survivors make it very easy to find them.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    Yes, last resort.

    It's something you can use but should never be your first call, because the other options are so much more effective and less time consuming on average that you're really leaving value on the table if you choose to patrol generators instead.

    Any generator you walk to that does not result in a chase is more time you're spending without pressuring survivors, and survivors who aren't being pressured are more than likely going to do generators. Patrolling generators is a good way to lose against halfway efficient teams.

    If you have no other information, patrolling generators is a good last resort, but in those scenarios you should really be asking yourself what you could've done/brought to have information at the time you needed it.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    So how do YOU know where to go to find people at the start then? Guess? Go in the direction of crows? Lethal Pursuer?

    No. You go the direct opposite of where you spawned, usually towards gens.

    I rest my case.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    At the start specifically, you go the opposite direction to where you spawned, towards where you suspect the survivors spawned.

    I mean, I run Lethal Pursuer a lot, but without it that's what I do.

    What I don't do is start making a loop of the generators, because that's wasting time. I go towards where I strongly suspect the survivors to already be, not searching each gen in turn. At the start of the game, it's painfully obvious why you wouldn't do that; you already have a really good idea where the survivors are likely to be.

    My point is that the rest of the trial is like that too, you just have to do the legwork to have that information instead of it being pseudo-guaranteed because of spawn logic. If you already know where a survivor is, patrolling generators would be a waste of time, and you have a lot of control over gaining that information… ergo, relying on patrolling generators is a waste of time, and a last resort you'd only turn to if your other methods of finding survivors have left you without information in that specific moment.

  • SidneysBane1996
    SidneysBane1996 Member Posts: 436

    I get that, but my point is that while you shouldn't patrol as a habit (yes, of course, just standing around the same gen cluster wastes time except in specific scenarios), there ARE reasons you check gens and it's definitely not just "as a last resort".

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    I mean, those reasons are the last resort.

    They'd be because you had to drop chase and don't know where anyone else is, or you got a hook and you don't know where anyone else is, and so on- patrolling generators is only something you'd do if you don't know where anyone else is, and there are a lot of options available to you for knowing where survivors are.

    If all those options fail you at once - which can happen! - then your last resort is generator patrol. What it shouldn't be is your basic gameplan and the thing you default to most of the time, because you almost certainly have better options available. Making a point of crafting your build and gameplan around keeping track of survivors is so much better than patrolling generators that I think it's totally fair to say generator patrol should only be done when you can't act on better information.

  • E2B2
    E2B2 Member Posts: 5

    I see what you mean, and gamesense is usually how I would expect someone to find survivors without relying on info perks, but patrolling gens just a little, not like over and over every single gen but just looking at a few different gens in a part of the map where you expect survivors to be can be a very good way to apply pressure. I do agree that if you're really just patrolling every gen on the map hoping for a survivor you're not going to get far, but I don't agree that that's something that is being massively done by any killer who knows what they're doing at all.

  • zarr
    zarr Member Posts: 1,015

    While generally true that killers gain more from concentrating on survivors than generators (a concept I've often brought up with friends when they got so distracted with trying to get value from their builds/powers that they seemingly forgot their actual objective over it and that the "value" these things bring is always merely contributing to the completion of said objective and that therefore if there are other things they can do in certain moments that bring them closer to that completion they should do those things even if they are completely removed from whatever perks etc. they are running), I do think generator-based game strategies are among the most viable.

    Of course you don't want to patrol generators across the map merely in the hopes of finding survivors on them instead of employing other means of more quickly and reliably finding survivors, let alone prioritize kicking those gens over being engaged in chases when you have found a survivor, or give up on chases to go back to patrolling gens willy-nilly. In those cases you will indeed lose a lot of time and at most delay your inevitable defeat as you aren't really making progress, survivors simply outpacing you gradually but guaranteededly. But there are various ways that change this equation and make it really attractive and effective to play around generators.

    The most obvious one is concentrating on a close-together cluster of at least 3 generators that survivors simply have to contest and that you can defend very effectively. While this strategy has been weakened with the introduction of the regression limit and is much more potent if there are only 3 survivors left, it is still something that can reliably lead to wins. For one thing, you will always find survivors on and around those gens because they have to get at least one of them done. And leaving chases after having gotten a hit or a perk or pallet out of the way and going back to defending those generators will regularly turn the tides in your favour as rather than gradually but surely losing, you are winning the war of attrition as survivor resources dwindle and the area around your gens becomes a deadzone, making it much more likely you will eventually actually be able to down and hook survivors quickly and frequently, as well as snowball those downs and hooks into more and more pressure as they are also happening in your cluster. Certain killers are downright oppressive at employing this strategy and will win most of every time doing so against uncoordinated survivor groups (i. e. non-SWF groups/groups without voice communication). Various gen-targeted perks obviously also help with this strategy, such as Eruption, Pop, Oppression, Surge, Dead Man's Switch.

    Hit-and-run strategies also revolve around patrolling gens and are similarly difficult (or downright impossible) for any but the most coordinated survivor groups to deal with if done properly. The idea with these strategies is that you can often get more or less "free" hits on survivors if you catch them off-guard (either getting the hit immediately or at least only having to chase after them for a short time before doing so), and gens are the places where you will most frequently do so. And if those survivors are already injured from previous interactions, "hits" of course become downs and hooks. These strategies do require some sort of means that allow you to get the jump on survivors. Most commonly that will be stealth mechanics (powers, add-ons or perks), but killers with teleportation or transportation abilities can also keep bouncing around and make it increasingly difficult for survivors to be able to leave in time so as to not get hit when interrupted at their gens, as pallets around those gens get depleted and Exhaustion perks put on cooldown and survivors more unsure of whether the killer is chasing around their gen or headed for it, and so on. Of course, here again you don't want to be blindly patrolling any and all gens, you will have to keep track of which gens survivors are or could be doing, and there's also perks and add-ons that will help with this (such as Surveillance or Discordance or Gearhead, or Wraith's "All Seeing" - Spirit/Legion's Fuming Mix Tape). Trail Of Torment and Unforeseen are two more "gen" perks that support these strategies on killers that don't have innate stealth mechanics, but even if you use things like Plaything or Monitor & Abuse and Nurse's Calling or the like, your gameplay loop will revolve around patrolling generators, trying to catch survivors off-guard on or around them.

    Nowhere To Hide deserves mention as one of if not the best anti-stealth perk in the game, and it obviously also relies on going to and kicking generators. For the basic gameplay loop of actually leaving hooks and venturing out to engage other survivors, NTH is a lifesaver. Too often players instead of taking a chase will hide as you approach their gen, even if someone is hooked and you not finding anyone else therefore leading to you having no real option but to return to the hook. NTH reliably gives you another chase, and between the 5% instant regression and 5% repair needed to stop the regression, kicking gens before you chase is actually often worthwhile if the survivor is hiding anyway (i. e. if you wouldn't have been able to engage them in a chase immediately or let alone gotten a hit instead of kicking the gen).

    I will also say that while Barbecue & Chilli is a really nice perk for the basic "hook it and book it" gameplay flow that you describe where you are aiming to have at least 3 survivors occupied for as much of a match as you can (one hooked, one unhooking, one chased), more optimal perhaps for that approach would be to show you survivors within the 40m range around the hook. That way, you are able to engage the survivor in a chase that would be the closest to the hook and could get the unhook the fastest, thereby then necessitating a survivor further away to leave their gen and spend the time going for the unhook and back again. This is part of the reason why I enjoy playing Doctor so much, being able to find survivors within a large radius around the hook after hooking. An alternative to this is Ultimate Weapon. A Scourge Hook perk that makes any survivor scream and reveal their aura as well as perhaps get Exhausted and/or Hindered for a couple of seconds if they are within a certain range of the hook upon hooking (perhaps tied to the killer's terror radius) would be cool.

  • Perrin3088
    Perrin3088 Member Posts: 8

    It sounds like your promoting creating a self crutch with reliance on aura reading perks and survivor altruistic

    Your mindset is what creates killers that insist on a perk meta they 'have to follow, when those perks are meant to aid or circumvent basic gameplay loops (like searching for survivors) and patrolling gens gives alot of information on survivor locations by showing what gens have progress and where scratch marks are. It also let's you identify strong loops and map locations without meta gaming.

    The post feels like it was written by a vet with everything unlocked that has lost sight of how to win without reliance on perks, and thus has lost touch with the new player experience.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    It doesn't have to be perks, but I do support using them while building these skills because it does make doing that easier.

    There are ways of directly tracking survivors that don't rely on perks, and separately, there are quite a few different kinds of perks that do this. You can play in this manner while cycling through perks and never building a reliance on any one thing, if you wanted to.

    Patrolling generators is something newer players are going to end up doing more often, and that's okay, they're newer and they're learning. My point is that what they're learning should be how to avoid the unnecessary downtime of walking between generators and instead just go directly to their target.

    My post is aimed primarily at killer players on these forums and elsewhere who think that the generators are their primary concern, in that they need to be patrolled and defended. I think it's worth pointing out that ideally you want to be trying to not have to patrol generators, while keeping it as a last resort option if you've got nothing else, and that defending generators is a very specific tool for a very specific job, not part of the killer's primary gameplay loop.

  • Mr_K
    Mr_K Member Posts: 9,228
    edited November 26

    What is the first call? Besides using certain perks, what are you suggesting the killer to do? By do, I want to know your plan at the match start. What are you doing besides going towards a gen?

  • MaTtRoSiTy
    MaTtRoSiTy Member Posts: 1,955

    You still need to patrol, just decide what gens you wont contest such as the single ones in an isolated corner, then you have a smaller area to patrol and pressure.

    Killers who don't protect gens tend to lose, the ones who are very conscious of where gens are at feel like they are all over you constantly and it creates a lot of pressure.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    Well, first of all, I'm not suggesting putting perks aside here. They're very useful for learning how to do this because they take some of the guesswork out of the learning process. I'm not saying they're necessary, but they're very useful and I'd definitely recommend using them.

    Beyond that, I'm talking about game sense for tracking. Once you hit a certain point, even without perks, you can have a pretty damn accurate idea of where all the survivors are. Even if there's some risk of the survivors not being there when you go check, acting on that information instead of patrolling generators is going to work out considerably better for you.

    So, for examples: At the start of the match, you can discern where the survivors probably are on most maps, because of spawn logic. You'd go straight to them instead of starting to walk around the generators, that's an example I think most people agree with.

    While you're playing, you can collect information on the survivors through the various basekit tools the killer's given for it. Distant scratch marks, crows flying, the occasional loud noise notification, any power-specific info, or frankly just seeing them while you're chasing someone else. It's important to note that I'm not saying to start looking for those tells when you next need to chase someone- I'm saying take stock of them throughout the game to keep track of where survivors probably are, to minimise the downtime spent searching once you've finished the chase you're in.

    Obviously you can't do this perfectly all the time in every game, but the same is true of any other tip/playstyle/strategy you'd employ in any game. It is the ideal to be shooting for, though, especially when amplified with the tracking perks of your choice.

  • jesterkind
    jesterkind Member Posts: 7,871

    It's not the generators and especially not the patrol that creates the pressure, it's chasing survivors.

    Patrolling generators implies walking between one to another, and every generator you walk to that a survivor isn't currently working on leaves every survivor able to do generators freely for as long as it takes you to walk to the next generator, rinse and repeat.

    Obviously, there's a small degree of gen defence that's necessary for playing well, but you don't need to be walking between them or heavily focusing on damaging them. You just need to know which ones have the most progress, because chasing the survivor working on that one gives you the most time to finish your chase and set your pressure up.